Hugely useful timeline of the Thai-Cambodia border crisis. Makes pretty clear that the whole thing has been instigated by, and most often escalated by, Cambodia, notwithstanding tit-for-tat on the Thai side. Why is this crisis happening, and why now? 🧵 1/14
As many sources say, this is an old dispute going back to the French imposition of the border in colonial times. It has festered and erupted into conflict before, in 2008, when Cambodia tried to get UNESCO recognition for Preah Vihear, a disputed temple. 2/
In 2008 the Thais were the instigators, with elite and middle class nationalist conservatives whipping up a moral panic to bring down a hated government aligned to ousted oligarch Thaksin Shinawatra and his poor/ working class supporters. 3/
This time a similar dynamic has played out, with Thaksin's daughter shunted aside as PM and facing impeachment for trying to de-escalate the conflict, as a phone call with Cambodia's de facto leader Hun Sen (leaked by him) revealed. Now Thailand's responding more robustly. 4/
Why then has Hun Sen picked this moment to initiate and escalate the crisis? It's hard to say, but his predatory regime has increasingly relied on coercion since 2013 as its grip on the populace has waned. Nationalism can rally folks round the flag - and it's working. 5/
Cambodian nationalism is heavily premised on a history of predation and encroachment from Thailand and (especially) Vietnam. Racist anti-Vietnamese xenophobia is rife in Cambodia, animating figures from Pol Pot to contemporary "liberal" opposition leaders. 6/
But Hun Sen and what became his CPP regime were installed by Vietnamese forces that overthrew Pol Pot in 1978. They've generally tried to keep a lid on anti-Vietnamese sentiment. That makes Thailand a safer outlet if you want to stir up nationalist sentiment. 7/
However, the CPP regime seems emboldened even to provoke Vietnam, albeit not militarily (wise, given the Vietnamese have bested even the US) but by proposing to construct a canal that will reroute Cambodian trade currently transiting Vietnam. 8/en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Funan_Tec…
The canal is Chinese-backed, like most megaprojects in Cambodia. Moreover, Cambodia's Ream naval base seems to host a permanent Chinese presence, much to the alarm of Vietnam, where China is a historical enemy and viewed with huge suspicion. 10/amti.csis.org/a-tale-of-two-…
Chinese support is arguably emboldening Hun Sen to assert his view of Cambodian national interests against neighbouring states - even if his provocative behaviour almost certainly isn't what China wants to see. China has been the CPP's key external backer since 2000. 11/
Chinese military aid & training have been important to develop key units tasked with CPP regime security, like the PM's bodyguard, some of which have been deployed near the Thai border. More generally, Chinese investments and infrastructure projects have enriched the regime. 12/
The land-grabbing, predation and criminality attending many Chinese projects has, contrarily, helped alienate mass support from the CPP, especially in rural areas. Ironically that incentivises the regime to engage in nationalist tub-thumping to rally support. 13/
So, in essence, two regimes with fundamental structural weaknesses, both with weak democratic legitimation, are engaged in a dangerous face-off that has little to do with the the land being disputed and much to do with their miserable internal politics. 14/14
PS (since this thread is going viral): people retweeting this, consider the content carefully. On both sides your nationalist outrage is being manipulated by elites who do not have your best interests at heart. Peace is in the true interests of both nations.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A Democrat disaster far worse than 2016, when Trump was unknown quantity & lost popular vote. Now: massive swings to Trump as known quantity; Dem vote collapsed from 2020 when Biden won pop vote by 7m; Senate flips; House may too. Why? Quick thoughts... 1/
That the Democrats could lose twice to Trump - this time even more badly - shows they are adrift, purposeless and cut off from a shrivelling popular base. Their micro-targeting, rainbow coalition strategy failed as minorities swung to Trump. 2/ unherd.com/2024/11/welcom…
Democrats/centrists will be full of contempt for such voters & blame sexism/racism. Indeed contempt characterises their entire relationship with citizens. How else to explain selection of neoliberal warhawk Clinton in 2016, senile Biden in 2020, then empty pantsuit Harris? 3/
As before I argue Britain's poor response to COVID-19 reflects not simply Tory incompetence or bad leadership, but rather deep transformations in Britain's state.
We foreground the transformation of government into governance and the rise of the "regulatory state". This involves:
- de-democratisation of the state to make it less responsive to public demands
- fragmentation and decentralisation of public authority and resources...
This report takes on a view propagated by think tanks and senior Western policymakers: that China's #BeltandRoad Initiative involves "debt trap diplomacy": deliberately luring developing countries into contracting unsustainable debt to finance infrastructure projects.
2/23
The idea being that, when these countries fall into debt distress, China can grab the infrastructure for itself, extending its geostrategic reach (e.g. more port bases for its navy), or otherwise exerting influence. US Sec of State Tillerson called it "predatory economics".
This report is the culmination of >10yrs working in UK universities & struggling in many organisations, from @UCU to @HEconvention, to try to improve them.
It builds on this long essay on marketisation, written last year, which >35k ppl read.
The report shows that HE expansion has delivered none of the expected benefits to society, but introduced many pathologies: wasteful spending, rampant bureaucracy & managerialism, degrading academic standards.
What the report actually says is: we didn't try to assess the efficacy of any Russian influence attempts (p.12), nor do we actually have any additional evidence of them (pp.12-15).
2/6
The report refers to "open source" investigations, but neglects to mention that these academic studies found Russian content "contributed relatively little" and "was not widely shared" - i.e. it was small beer and had no real impact.