(1) Quick thread about the 2018 National Guard border deployment. It takes literally 15 minutes to find, read & watch enough info about the 2006 #OperationJumpStart mission for anyone to understand the good it will do. Watch this 2 min video:
(2) Guardsmen & women throughout the country are offered the opportunity to volunteer for this mission. (I imagine any Governors unwilling to co-operate are gonna have a bad time). It's great for the country but it's also great for the volunteers.
(3) Members of the National Guard come from all walks of life & have all kinds of personal circumstances. Most will serve anywhere, anytime even if that's at particularly high cost, like being in Iraq for 16 months while your only child goes through infancy & toddlerhood.
(4) It's uncomfortably hot at the border for most of the year, esp from now on. But come winter, a lot of Guardsmen & women might factor in the chance to get away from the cold for 90 days or more.😉 The skills developed help advance careers inside & outside the Guard.
(5) From what I've seen, people report strong satisfaction from serving alongside CBP law enforcement and other public servants. It just makes common sense that the deployment helps the Guard with readiness. Busy people are learning & growing.
(6) For those who complain about the cost of carrying out this critical national security function on an emergency basis: Guess what, there's a less expensive way to do it.
(7) #BuildTheWall is necessary but not sufficient, and for 17 months Congress has been made well aware of the other measures that are needed, down to the number of vehicles and radios. There are no excuses. None.
(8) Trump has won the argument, the debate is over, the wall's being built, it will pay for itself 100 x in cost savings, the border is secure, and we continue to Make America Great Again.
Well said, @DonnaLeeSun. I have the same approach.
Donna is "Unapologretically Canadian."
I am Unapologetically New Zealander/Kiwi. Granted, "sorry" has a special meaning in Canada, eh? But our countries do have a lot in common. Mini-thread:
I really get what Donna is saying in her Twitter bio:
"Trumpism has a strong foothold in Canada & we ignore it at our peril. Pay attention, esp. to PP, former PM Harper & idiot Premiers!"
The same is true of New Zealand, Australia, and our OG mothership: The UK.
PP stands for Pierre Poilievre, who became the leader of Canada's conservative party on 10 September 2022.
For me it's super simple: Far right extremism gained a foothold in the US, only to be rejected by majorities of voters multiple times since. Because #DemocracyWins.
Evidently, my above use of the term misogyny has triggered a few of them.
They're trying to insinuate that Kohberger was a liberal which, even if true, would have nothing to do with the points made in my tweet. We already know several things about him, and his crimes...
Further, when writing the above list of 5 known and/or confirmed misogynists, some of whom have killed at least one woman, I considered a range of factors that put them on that list.
I want to encourage discussion about misogny and the targeting of women by violent offenders.
Esp. the 2020 US presidential election, and others where right wing governments were (and will soon be) punished for anti- public health and safety, anti-science, ignorant approaches to pandemic response.
Do politicians and their advisers get this yet? In most households, it is one or more women who take basic health and safety seriously, & who develop a superior knowledge base due to our more complex biology, higher rates of illness, & greater need for infection control measures.
Of course there are many men with the same health knowledge and risk management priorities as women, but we are talking about "in general" here, and how that applies to elections.
Gotta laugh, my tweet generated the following reply from a maga account:
"Ukraine flag in bio"
Ad hominem/genetic fallacy is all they have. They deflect by targeting the player not the ball. Because playing the ball is too hard for them. It requires honesty & courage.
I'm talking about changing the way domestic violence incidents are handled, and doing more to put long term distance between known DV offenders and their legal access to guns.
An idea best espoused by the outstanding @BeauTFC. Link to follow.
The outstanding @BeauTFC talked about this issue here:
I wonder what price between $8 billion and $44 billion Elon Howard Hughes Musk might consider to sell this vital pro-democracy communications hub before he completely destroys it.
I mean, that's his goal, right?
He paid waaaay too much for it. Value currently estimated at $8 billion. Surely there are billionaires out there with the ability to build a consortium to entice it out of his grubby little hands?
There's a good argument for the US federal government buying it, too...
Or a group of countries. It's not all about the US, you know.
What does the Putin regime have on Musk, that could get him to over-spend so much money? The global fascist movement is the only winner out of this. Or was it the Mercers?