Actually the previous thread was able to accommodate all my remaining state dinner photos. This one goes back to the arrival ceremony that morning with photos I found later. List of threads: godlessnz.wordpress.com/2017/10/27/lin… … …
(2) These are really good photos, worth the wait. Most are the official WH photos that are posted a day or so after the event.
The stars along the concrete matched the lapel pins that WH staffers wore.
(3) It's hard to see how the next state visit can be as successful as this one was... but I bet FLOTUS will find a way.
(4) View from the WH roof, I believe. You can see the gun salute smoke in the distance. The crowd is several people deep on either side of the structure set up for the media to stand on.
(5) Every WH department would have been involved in the state visit. Photographers in multiple locations. I'd say they had to outsource some of that work.
(6) Two Presidents who know their countries are free because of the brave. There were lots of references to previous battles esp. the War of Independence, WWI, and WWII.
(7) A very enthusiastic crowd at the Arrival Ceremony on Day 2.
(8) Waiting for the next task.
(9) Early on Day 2.
(10) Iconic photos.
(11) 😘
(12) These two different, yet similar, First Ladies also get on extremely well. I've seen them together in Hamburg, Paris and Washington, and each time they were smiling and laughing together, holding hands or arm in arm. It's not what I'm used to but I like it.
(13) I saved the best for last. Before the state dinner, these four sat chatting in the Red Room. Informality in a formal setting.
Well said, @DonnaLeeSun. I have the same approach.
Donna is "Unapologretically Canadian."
I am Unapologetically New Zealander/Kiwi. Granted, "sorry" has a special meaning in Canada, eh? But our countries do have a lot in common. Mini-thread:
I really get what Donna is saying in her Twitter bio:
"Trumpism has a strong foothold in Canada & we ignore it at our peril. Pay attention, esp. to PP, former PM Harper & idiot Premiers!"
The same is true of New Zealand, Australia, and our OG mothership: The UK.
PP stands for Pierre Poilievre, who became the leader of Canada's conservative party on 10 September 2022.
For me it's super simple: Far right extremism gained a foothold in the US, only to be rejected by majorities of voters multiple times since. Because #DemocracyWins.
Evidently, my above use of the term misogyny has triggered a few of them.
They're trying to insinuate that Kohberger was a liberal which, even if true, would have nothing to do with the points made in my tweet. We already know several things about him, and his crimes...
Further, when writing the above list of 5 known and/or confirmed misogynists, some of whom have killed at least one woman, I considered a range of factors that put them on that list.
I want to encourage discussion about misogny and the targeting of women by violent offenders.
Esp. the 2020 US presidential election, and others where right wing governments were (and will soon be) punished for anti- public health and safety, anti-science, ignorant approaches to pandemic response.
Do politicians and their advisers get this yet? In most households, it is one or more women who take basic health and safety seriously, & who develop a superior knowledge base due to our more complex biology, higher rates of illness, & greater need for infection control measures.
Of course there are many men with the same health knowledge and risk management priorities as women, but we are talking about "in general" here, and how that applies to elections.
Gotta laugh, my tweet generated the following reply from a maga account:
"Ukraine flag in bio"
Ad hominem/genetic fallacy is all they have. They deflect by targeting the player not the ball. Because playing the ball is too hard for them. It requires honesty & courage.
I'm talking about changing the way domestic violence incidents are handled, and doing more to put long term distance between known DV offenders and their legal access to guns.
An idea best espoused by the outstanding @BeauTFC. Link to follow.
The outstanding @BeauTFC talked about this issue here:
I wonder what price between $8 billion and $44 billion Elon Howard Hughes Musk might consider to sell this vital pro-democracy communications hub before he completely destroys it.
I mean, that's his goal, right?
He paid waaaay too much for it. Value currently estimated at $8 billion. Surely there are billionaires out there with the ability to build a consortium to entice it out of his grubby little hands?
There's a good argument for the US federal government buying it, too...
Or a group of countries. It's not all about the US, you know.
What does the Putin regime have on Musk, that could get him to over-spend so much money? The global fascist movement is the only winner out of this. Or was it the Mercers?