The Merge has been part of the Ethereum roadmap for 6+ years: a community-wide effort telegraphed from the early days
Yet now, less than 8 weeks away from mainnet Merge, a wave of doubt is rising focused on a hostile PoW fork
Here's why a PoW ETH fork is a *non-event*:
(0/15)
First, what is a fork?
The ability to fork is a *fundamental right* for a blockchain's community. Forks provide the community the ability to choose; forks represent a right to underlying freedom
There are 2 types of forks - soft forks and hard forks - with key traits:
(1/15)
Soft fork: a "software upgrade" for a blockchain which is backward compatible with blocks prior to the fork
Hard fork: adds a fundamental update which is no longer backward compatible
The ETH Merge will be a hard fork into a fully PoS chain *no longer secured by miners*
(2/15)
Soft fork: if the update is accepted by all users - the end result is a single blockchain
Hard fork: could cause a split into an original chain and a new chain with the update. But - if the update is accepted by the whole community, the end result is also a single chain
(3/15)
How does this relate to the Merge?
The Merge has been a universal, widely broadcasted goal to upgrade ETH into an economically and environmentally sustainable blockchain
Any Merge hard fork perpetuating the original Proof of Work chain is detrimental to that goal
(4/15)
A PoW hard fork would only occur if existing miners keep mining PoW ETH rather than updating client software to PoS prior to the Merge
Does it make economic sense for a miner to keep mining PoW? To maximize profit, maybe.
But it creates a ghost chain with no legitimacy
(5/15)
Ethereum is not a single purpose blockchain whose job is to secure a store of value by maximizing miner profits
Chaotic outcome: If stablecoins on PoW ETH go to 0, then all liquidity pools on PoW AMMs with stablecoin vs token pairs break, and tokens on PoW ETH can't be traded
More chaos: The same happens with the cloned PoW WBTC on PoW ETH - it goes to zero (can't create more BTC)
(9/15)
Chaotic outcome: if PoW WBTC on PoW ETH goes to zero, then all debt vaults (Maker, Aave) that use WBTC as collateral become undercollateralized and will need to be liquidated
If the vaults were used to borrow stablecoins, and if stablecoins go to zero, how do we repay?
(10/15)
We could go on, but it is a waste of mental space
Ethereum has a responsibility: it represents legitimacy for the economy built on top of it. ETH stands for more than near-term profit maximization
Thus, all the legitimate apps, stablecoins, NFTs will pick the PoS chain
(11/15)
The PoS ETH chain allows for better security, decentralization, economic and environmental sustainability - and players in the ETH economy will seamlessly move to PoS
The *only* actors that will sustain the PoW fork are profit mercenaries that want to sell their PoW ETH
(12/15)
Because nothing else will work!
There will be no DeFi to use PoW ETH, no stablecoins to borrow against PoW ETH, no staking of PoW ETH
The only game is hoping a centralized exchange lists PoW ETH to sell
Hence, the *only purpose* of the PoW ETH fork is to dump PoW ETH
(13/15)
At the end of the day, the Merge will succeed, and the Ethereum economy will seamlessly thrive on the PoS ETH chain
Even if there are 10 PoW forks, they will have no activity, no users, no assets (except hot potato PoW ETH waiting for CEX liquidity), and no *legitimacy*
(14/15)
PoW ETH has no community except profit mercenaries
As @VitalikButerin said, "even a billion dollars of capital cannot compete with a project having a soul"
PoW ETH will not have a billion dollars, and most certainly will not have a soul
*PoW ETH will be a non-event*
(15/15)
Few additional resources -
@ryanberckmans has a complementary thread on distractions caused by a PoW fork:
Lastly, here's an overview of what PoS $ETH looks like post Merge and why it results in a more secure, more decentralized, more economically and environmentally sustainable blockchain:
The Ethereum Merge is one of the most powerful catalysts in crypto history, and it is quickly approaching
As we reach the endgame for ETH under the proof of work regime, let's address 10 important characteristics of post-Merge, proof of stake ETH:
(0/11)
1. Post Merge, ETH L1 fees will NOT come down
The purpose of the Merge is to deprecate Ethereum's PoW consensus mechanism and replace it with PoS. Fees are a function of blockspace demand, NOT consensus mechanism. For lower fees, use the L2s (already live) for execution
(1/11)
2. For a 6-12 month window post Merge, there will be no structural sell pressure from ETH issuance
Staked ETH and issuance/block rewards to validators cannot be withdrawn until withdrawals are enabled. However, fee tips (basefee is burned) and MEV can be withdrawn
While alt L1s made blockchains cheaper and more accessible in 2021, they took shortcuts to scale and will hit structural limits
Optimistic rollups are ready for the mainstream spotlight, and the ZK rollup cavalry is on the way (Polygon, Starknet, zkSync, and others)
(2/9)
There are two catalysts for ETH to go parabolic in 2022:
1) Rollups launch tokens.
Tokens represent incentives and community upside. Alt L1s won marketshare in 2021 because of tokens that went up. Rollups will follow the same playbook and bring users back to Ethereum