Thread by @AgeCase

Climate change over thousands of years is caused by tectonic plate movements and is something humans can't change but some can profit from by convincing others it is our fault

Adding 10% 'NET co2' to the carbon sink in 250 years is our fault

#UK #ClimateScam #EU #abolishNATO

1) A world powered by Nuclear Fission by 2035 and He3 Nuclear fusion by 2060 would be the fastest, safest, cheapest, least materials used and least pollutant way possible to help get the world to net-zero co2 and eliminate record profits from corrupt energy companies

2) Local food growing and better land management not record profits. Humanity was locally self-reliant for thousands of years, until the big Agri biz, international shipping and supermarkets came along to grow their profits and destroy local environments at the same time

3) Oil companies lobby Gov officials have not only designed the climate change 'Movement', they fund the 'controlled opposition' but also fund the 'Climate Rebellions'. None of them offer any solutions other than tax-by-stealth policies and securing the legacy of oil companies

4) Enough evidence shows the US went to the moon. There's also enough Helium 3 on the moon's surface to power the world for thousands of years, the US and oil companies funded the 'Controlled opposition' making the moon seem pointless, expensive and hard to get to or go back

5) 9/11 was much more than the War on terror, Homeland security act, and illegal invasions of Iraq, Syria, Libya and Afghanistan which all generated $Billions. Carbon trading futures from co2 will generate $trillions for years to come and controlling that monopoly was essential

There was literally a cyber war going on within the WTC complex for months before 9/11 between Cantor, Aon and CCX whilst the CIA/FBI was watching. Where did that $3.2 Trillion at the Pentagon go missing the day before...?

6) Scientists are now producing more energy from Nuclear fusion experiments than what is put in. A fusion-powered future is one step closer, maybe another 20-30 years, but not a current threat as its decades away and not a threat to the anti-human, degrowth great reset agenda now

7) As governments and corporations push the green electric agenda onto people, at the same time they are failing to meet demands in favor of importing fossil fuels.

More sources of Nuclear, solar and Energy-recovery biomass facilities need to be funded and built

8) WATCH 👀: Fission and fusion are two physical processes that produce massive amounts of energy from atoms. Fission produces X6 more than what combustion energy produces by splitting an atom to heat water up, Fusion X4 more than what Fission produces by fusing 2 atoms together

9) Nuclear energy is capable of working 92% of the time, meaning we dont have to rely on the elements to protect us from the elements whilst providimng us with the energy we need

10) Nuclear energy protects air quality and the health of millions of people by avoiding harmful emissions. Current fission plants avoid 476 metric tons of co2 each year, less acid rain, smog, and the least greenhouse gases compared to other energy sources of electricity

11) Nuclear fuel, the most energy dense available such as a 1-inch uranium pellet with a market cost of £48 could power 1 house for 7.5 years. With new technology in India and France 98% of the Uranium can be used and not the traditional 4% leaving 96% as stored waste underground

12) More (Energy Recovery Facility) or incinerators that treat household waste that cannot be reused, composted or recycled and generates electricity from it. The electricity produced is sold to the National Grid and is enough to supply 25,000 to 50,000 homes depending on design

13) Organic molecules don't just contain carbon. They contain hydrocarbons or carbon bonded to hydrogen. But in carbon dioxide, it is not present, so it is not an organic compound thus humans have added 10% net co2 of non-organic molecules to the carbon cycle

14) To match this 10% of Net co2 (45 Billion tonnes) that humans have added to the carbon cycle in 250 years, it would mean tripling the number of volcanoes on earth (Over 1500 active) and for them to be erupting all year round.

15) Leaders of the world believe the wealthy industrial nations (Tax payers) should pay the annual £2Trillion climate reparations, when in reality the top 200 polluting corporations including ExxonMobile, BP, and BlackRock should pay it all, a small amount out of their profits

16) Adding 10% 'NET co2' to the carbon sink in 250 years is not correct. For 205 years human emissions stayed within the carbon cycle, in the last 45 year we have added 10% net co2, ExxonMobile discovered and hid this information

17) Taking humans adding 10% net co2 to earths carbon sink, out of the equation. The Nuclear renaissance will not only bring millions out of poverty, but also into a more reliable, cleaner, cheaper energy source for thousands of years, the other sources couldn't do that

18) Human co2 emissions in excess of the carbon cycle aggravate earth's ability to regulate itself and excel heat back into space trapping it in our atmosphere. This eventually warms areas of the planet up, causing flooding and extreme weather patterns and seasons

19) From 1978 to 1983 ExxonMobile conducted many science experiments on the climate. Then they cut funding and funded both sides of the argument. They didn't hide evidence but rather procrastinated enough to give them a few year's advantage and get ahead of everyone else

20) Evidence in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, ice cores, air and layers of rocks reveals current warming is occurring X10 faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age. Human Co2 is increasing X250 than it did from natural sources after the last Ice Age

21) In 1824, almost 200 years ago French scientist Jean-Baptiste Fourier began studying the climate and since then there have been many experiments on the climate and how human activities have added more carbon into the equation.

22) 5 things that will revolutionize and save the planet

1) Replace oil/plastic products with Mycelium/Hemp
2) Have a more Transparent Democracy
3) Decentralized Blockchain technology
4) Create better ecosystem conservation systems
5) Implement Nuclear Fission/Fusion energy

23) Most "green energies' lead you to coal

24) Net Co2 (adding Co2 on top of what earths carbon cycles can sequester)

Net energy (How much energy and money does it take to get energy)

These are 2 certainties that humanity cant avoid. We've gone over 10% in Net Co2 since 1979 and hit Net energy probably around 2008

25) The energy industry is broken up into 4 sections

Upstream - extraction
Midstream - production
Downstream - Processing, transporting/storing, sales
Carbon - Futures and capturing

OPEC exports 60% of the world's oil, notice the same corporations controlling each section

26) By far the safest and cleanest source of energy, so why do Greenpeace and other so-called environmentalists oppose nuclear energy...?

27) The best possible mix, by 2050 I can't see why this isn't possible other than corrupt energy companies and their profits which have destroyed parts of the planet and held humanity back for 50 years.

We dont need oil, gas, bio, hydro, wind but do need nuclear, solar and coal

28) The term 'net zero' coined by the UN is a con just as much as perpetual motion. Corporations destroy the world and buy carbon credits so they can say they have offset their co2, its a £trillion money laundering scheme.

We need to drain the international swamp of corruption