1) Bruce Ohr’s relationship with Christopher Steele via texts and emails has been thrust into the spotlight recently.

The texts and emails are between Ohr and Steele but involve other parties as well.
themarketswork.com/2018/08/12/the…
2) Ohr is a long-time friend of Steele w/relationship going back to at least 2006 (includes Ohr’s wife Nellie).

Adam Waldman represented Oleg Deripaska & Sergey Lavrov.

Waldman also represented Christopher Steele & Julian Assange.
3) Steele appears to be lobbying on behalf of Oleg Deripaska – raising questions of Deripaska’s role in the Dossier.

It’s not clear if Steele was employed by Deripaska – but it feels that way.

This question was first raised by Grassley in February 2018.
tabletmag.com/jewish-news-an…
4) Emails from the York article will be looked at below - along w/ relevant events.
washingtonexaminer.com/news/emails-sh…
5) Several points:

Steele is clearly advocating on behalf of Deripaska during several conversations.

Specifically in the initial emails.

On July 1, 2016 the focus shifts to Trump – and timing of Ohr/Steele contact centers around ongoing Dossier Memo production by Steele.
6) Cont:

Simpson has contact w/Ohr on August 22, 2016 – in contrast w/Congressional testimony.

Multiple contacts occur on October 18-19, 2016 – email, Skype, calls.

Nellie Ohr joined Fusion GPS somewhere around March 2016.
7) January 12-February 21, 2016 - Several conversations re: Deripaska.

Steele is lobbying on Deripaska's behalf.

See article for details.
8) March 17 20016 – Steele sends email asking if Ohr has any update on plans to visit Europe “in the near term where we could meet up.”

Ohr says no. Offers call. Unclear if call occurred.
9) July 1 2016 – Apparent first mention of Candidate-Trump:

Steele: I am seeing [redacted] in London next week to discuss ongoing business but there is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!
10) In addition to the Trump reference, Steele is probably referring to a meeting with FBI Agent Mike Gaeta in London on July 5, 2016.

See attached for notable events during this period.
11) July 29 2016 – Steele: [I’ll] be in DC at short notice on business.

See attached for notable events during this period.
12) July 30 2016 – A breakfast meeting between Steel and Bruce & Nellie Ohr takes place.

Notable events around this period – same as July 29, 2016 PLUS:
13) August 22 2016 -Ohr receives email from Fusion GPS’ Glenn Simpson:

Simpson: Can u ring.

Ohr’s log lists contact with Simpson. Notably Simpson told Congress he had no contact with Ohr until after Thanksgiving 2016 – and the election.

Notable events around this period:
14) September 16 2016 – Steele: [I’ll be in Washington soon] on business of mutual interest.

September 21 2016 – Steele: Keen to meet up with you after my scheduled meetings.

September 23 2016 – Steele and Ohr have a breakfast meeting in Washington.

Notable events:
15) October 18 2016 – Steele: If you are in Washington today, I have something quite urgent I would like to discuss with you, preferably by Skype (even before work if you can).

A Skype call takes place immediately following the email.

A 2nd Skype call is had. Calls on 10/19
16) November 21 2016 – Ohr receives email from Kathleen Kavalec, Dep Asst Secretary of State – Bureau of European Affairs:

Kavalec sent Ohr information on Simon Kukes.

Kavalec references connection to Serge Millian.

Millian is reported to be Source D and E in the Dossier.
17) December 12 2016 – Per Ohr’s phone log:

Ohr: Glenn Simpson. Some more news. Spoke with him.

Notable events around this period:
18) January 20 2017 – Email from Simpson:

Simpson: Can you call me please?

Notable events around this period:
19) There was quite a bit swirling around these conversations.

For a description of involved parties:

Bruce Ohr
Christopher Steele
Glenn Simpson
Oleg Deripaska
Adam Waldman
Paul Hauser
Kathleen Kavalec
Nellie Ohr
Sergei Millian

Please see article. /End.
themarketswork.com/2018/08/12/the…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

Feb 17
Meanwhile, Baker was asked if this type of interaction with an outside counsel had ever occurred before. In response, Baker admitted that his interaction with Sussmann was singularly unique:

Mr. Baker: I that that’s correct. Sitting here today, that’s the only one I can remember
Sussmann was never interviewed by the FBI, which Baker also found surprising, noting:

“It is logical to me that we [the FBI] would go back and interview [Sussmann].”

Sussmann WAS interviewed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Dec. 18, 2017.
Meadows to Baker:

“Everything about this investigation seems to have been done in an abnormal way, the way that you have gotten the information, the way that Strzok got information, the way that Ohr was used, the way that Perkins Coie actually came in and gave you information.”
Read 7 tweets
Feb 15
Durham Filing Detailing Spying on Trump White House Raises National Security Implications

New from @HansMahncke & Myself
theepochtimes.com/durham-filing-…
Durham also notes an email exchange re: the Alfa allegations involving former Perkins Coie attorney Marc Elias and three Clinton campaign officials: communications director Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook, and senior foreign policy advisor Jake Sullivan.
That email exchange w/Elias, Sullivan, Palmieri and Mook re: the now-disproven Alfa Bank allegations took place on Sep. 15, 2016, only four days before Sussmann took the Alfa information to the FBI.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 2
1) Durham Filing Rebuts Inspector General Horowitz’s Claims on Missing Cellphones, Hints at Growing Rift

Durham-Horowitz: Part II

From @HansMahncke & myself

Thread includes an abbreviated timeline of events, as follows:
theepochtimes.com/durham-filing-…
2) Dec. 17, 2021

Horowitz informed Durham that in March 2017 Sussmann told an OIG SAG that one of his clients had observed that a specific OIG employee’s computer was “seen publicly” in “Internet traffic” and was connecting to a Virtual Private Network in a foreign country.
3) At the time Horowitz provided this report to Durham on December 17, 2021, Horowitz represented to Durham & team that it had “no other file[s] or other documentation” relating to this cyber matter.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 29
1) Based on Durham's new filing it seems Horowitz felt compelled to respond - perhaps because Durham's Jan 25th filing was so damaging.

"After reviewing the Special Counsel’s Office’s public filing, the DOJ Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) brought to our attention..."
2) Horowitz's response as detailed in Durham's new filing appears weak - and does not seem to be backed by much evidence.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3) Horowitz says OIG records show that Baker's two cell phones were "likely" discussed during a call on Feb. 12, 2018.

Durham says he does not remember either this call or the discussion of Baker's cell phones.

Note: OIG did not gain possession of phones until Feb 15, 2018.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 11
We already knew that Daszak continued his work under his NIH grant until April 2020. May even have gone beyond. This was revealed in Daszak's response letter to NIH. See below.

The question is, was ANY work done/funded under Daszak's 2018 proposal.
theepochtimes.com/daszaks-ecohea…
The 2018 proposal, provided by DRASTIC, is separate (technically) from Daszak's NIH-funded work.

2018 proposal (funding denied) contained remarkable similarities to Covid pandemic but the Murphy report needs more vetting from what I've seen.
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
As noted last night, it's entirely possible there's conflation between Dasak's NIH-funded work & his 2018 proposal.

It's also possible that Veritas report is correct but we need more.

Seems almost too neat, too perfect. Raises questions.

Waiting for more info before judgment.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11
This is in direct relation to documents previously released by DRASTIC.

The rejection letter referred to was included in the DRASTIC release.

BUT this does re-raise the very valid question as to why this proposal from Daszak was buried.

See:
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
Note that the DRASTIC release was already authenticated by Linfa Wang, one of the scientists who was involved in Daszak’s proposal.

DRASTIC release here: drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-d…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(