This is in direct relation to documents previously released by DRASTIC.
The rejection letter referred to was included in the DRASTIC release.
BUT this does re-raise the very valid question as to why this proposal from Daszak was buried.
See:
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
The rejection letter referred to was included in the DRASTIC release.
BUT this does re-raise the very valid question as to why this proposal from Daszak was buried.
See:
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
https://twitter.com/EricSpracklen/status/1480728983515930624
Note that the DRASTIC release was already authenticated by Linfa Wang, one of the scientists who was involved in Daszak’s proposal.
DRASTIC release here: drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-d…
DRASTIC release here: drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-d…
This information from Murphy is:
1) Possible conflation w/Daszak's existing work [separate from 2018 leaked proposal] that required annual updates.
2) Misinterpretation or bad info
3) The mother of all smoking guns
#1 seems likely but #3 would answer much. Need Murphy's docs.
1) Possible conflation w/Daszak's existing work [separate from 2018 leaked proposal] that required annual updates.
2) Misinterpretation or bad info
3) The mother of all smoking guns
#1 seems likely but #3 would answer much. Need Murphy's docs.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
