Share this page!

Jeff Carlson Profile picture
Twitter logo
11 Jan, 4 tweets, 2 min read
We already knew that Daszak continued his work under his NIH grant until April 2020. May even have gone beyond. This was revealed in Daszak's response letter to NIH. See below.

The question is, was ANY work done/funded under Daszak's 2018 proposal.
theepochtimes.com/daszaks-ecohea…
The 2018 proposal, provided by DRASTIC, is separate (technically) from Daszak's NIH-funded work.

2018 proposal (funding denied) contained remarkable similarities to Covid pandemic but the Murphy report needs more vetting from what I've seen.
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
As noted last night, it's entirely possible there's conflation between Dasak's NIH-funded work & his 2018 proposal.

It's also possible that Veritas report is correct but we need more.

Seems almost too neat, too perfect. Raises questions.

Waiting for more info before judgment.
I have similar view to @HansMahncke on this release:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

Jeff Carlson Profile picture
11 Jan
This is in direct relation to documents previously released by DRASTIC.

The rejection letter referred to was included in the DRASTIC release.

BUT this does re-raise the very valid question as to why this proposal from Daszak was buried.

See:
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
Note that the DRASTIC release was already authenticated by Linfa Wang, one of the scientists who was involved in Daszak’s proposal.

DRASTIC release here: drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-d…
See also:
Read 4 tweets
Jeff Carlson Profile picture
5 Dec 21
Hi @ggreenwald

Important to note that they DID NOT recant within days.

We know because this same group aggressively pushed their Natural Origin narrative to National Academy of Sciences in Feb.

Also, 1st draft of Proximal Origin was completed same day as Fauci Feb 1 call.
This details how Fauci & other scientists tried to shape the narrative of a NASEM response to the White House in Feb 2020.

2 days after Fauci was told it was a lab leak, his group pushed Natural Origin narrative that was written SAME day as Fauci call.
theepochtimes.com/behind-the-sce…
There was a very direct and orchestrated cover-up.

1) Feb 1, 2020 - Fauci told lab leak was 70-80% likely

2) 1st draft of Proximal Origin completed same day

3) Feb 3, 2020 - Fauci presents to NASEM. Daszak & Andersen there

4) Fauci scientists push Natural Origin to NASEM
Read 4 tweets
Jeff Carlson Profile picture
21 Nov 21
1) It's suddenly become conveniently fashionable for the same journalists who promoted Steele's Russia- Collusion nonsense to claim that:

1) They never did any such thing

2) Yes, the dossier was flawed but look at the ICA. Or [fill in blank here]...
2) Or claim that:

1) "The notion that the media started questioning Trump’s ties to Russia because of the Steele dossier is even more preposterous."

Because

2) "The report was faulty, but Trump was very, very guilty."
nymag.com/intelligencer/…
3) The Steele dossier laid groundwork for claims of Russia-Collusion.

And the Intelligence Community Assessment was an attempt by Brennan, Clapper & Comey to fortify those claims - w/ridiculous reports of "Facebook something"

In some respects, the Steele dossier WAS the ICA.
Read 15 tweets
Jeff Carlson Profile picture
16 Nov 21
The latest narrative:

"So many were taken in so easily because the dossier seemed to confirm what they already suspected."

Journalists weren't "taken in".

They worked willfully w/the Clinton campaign & the Intelligence Community overturn an election.
nytimes.com/2021/11/15/opi…
2) As he asks "where did much of the press go wrong?" @bgrueskin inadvertently engages in exactly what he purports to criticize:

"There is no doubt that Mr. Trump had long curried Mr. Putin’s favor"
3) "When a well-known liar tells you that something is false, the instinct is to believe that it might well be true."

"None of this should minimize the endemic and willful deceptions of the right-wing press."
Read 4 tweets
Jeff Carlson Profile picture
3 Nov 21
This is one heck of a 14-page letter:

"We have significant concerns about the adequacy of NIH oversight of EcoHealth and the related research activities at the WIV and other organizations in China."
republicans-energycommerce.house.gov/wp-content/upl…
"NIH also failed to report EcoHealth’s noncompliance and grant suspension into the SAM.gov database that alerts other U.S. Government agencies to risky grant recipients..."
"NIH, USAID and Department of Defense (DoD) have paid EcoHealth more than $23.4 million in new and renewed assistance awards since April 2020, when NIH should have reported the administrative action it took against EcoHealth’s grant."
Read 19 tweets
Jeff Carlson Profile picture
27 Oct 21
1) New from @HansMahncke & myself

NIH Gain-of-Function Statement on EcoHealth, Wuhan Lab, Inadvertently Reveals Cover-Up
theepochtimes.com/nih-gain-of-fu…
2) EcoHealth failed to provide NIH w/contractually obligated 2019 fifth-year report until this month.

But EcoHealth’s 2018 report should have immediately alerted NIH that agency money was being used to create coronaviruses that were far more pathogenic than the original viruses.
3) The 2018 disclosures by EcoHealth highlight two problems:

1) EcoHealth had already violated the terms of its grant.

2) The fact that EcoHealth made the NIH aware of the results of its gain-of-function experiments in 2018, placed an inherent oversight requirement on NIH.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @themarketswork has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @themarketswork!

Read all threads by @themarketswork

:(