Jeff Carlson Profile picture
Feb 2 12 tweets 3 min read
1) Durham Filing Rebuts Inspector General Horowitz’s Claims on Missing Cellphones, Hints at Growing Rift

Durham-Horowitz: Part II

From @HansMahncke & myself

Thread includes an abbreviated timeline of events, as follows:
theepochtimes.com/durham-filing-…
2) Dec. 17, 2021

Horowitz informed Durham that in March 2017 Sussmann told an OIG SAG that one of his clients had observed that a specific OIG employee’s computer was “seen publicly” in “Internet traffic” and was connecting to a Virtual Private Network in a foreign country.
3) At the time Horowitz provided this report to Durham on December 17, 2021, Horowitz represented to Durham & team that it had “no other file[s] or other documentation” relating to this cyber matter.
4) January 5, 2022 - Members of Durham’s investigative team conducted a conference call with the FBI’s Inspection Division in an effort to obtain information about call log data for former FBI General Counsel James Baker.
5) January 6, 2022 - FBI’s Inspection Division tells Durham’s Office that Horowitz has custody of 2 of Baker's FBI cellphones.

January 7, 2022 - Durham immediately contacts Horowitz and asks for any info including forensic reports re: Baker's cell phones.
6) Jan 10, 2022 - Horowitz provides info on Baker's cell phones to Durham.

Jan 10, 2022 - Sussmann asks Durham for info re: meeting attended by NYT reporters, Baker, Bill Priestap & Michael Kortan. Likely relates to Sept '16 when Sussmann went to FBI & Times on Alfa allegations.
7) ~Jan 10-11, 2022:

Durham asks Horowitz to conduct additional exams of Baker's cell phones.

~Same timeframe:

Horowitz tells Durham (for 1st time) it will be "technically" difficult to comply w/Durham's Oct 13, 2021 discovery request on Sussmann - 3 months after request made.
8) Jan 20, 2022 - Sussmann's team tells Durham that he met personally w/Horowitz in March 2017 when conveying cyber issue to the OIG.

Sussmann also discloses to Durham that his client who provided info on cyber-matter was Rodney Joffe - Tech Exec-1 in Durham indictment.
9) Jan 20, 2022 - Upon learning this, Durham immediately makes inquiry w/Horowitz.

Jan 22, 2022 - Horowitz tells Durham for 1st time that he personally met w/Sussmann in March 2017.

Jan 25, 2022 - Durham’s first Horowitz-related filing made. Details evidence w/held by Horowitz.
10) Evening of Jan 26, 2022 - Horowitz gives Durham the previously requested forensic reports on Baker's phones.

Jan. 28, Durham issues 2nd filing. Adds new details regarding Baker’s cellphones. Discloses existence of additional cellphones that are in Horowitz's possession.
11) Durham's latest filing says newly disclosed phones are in addition to Baker’s 2 phones & relate to Durham’s criminal leak investigation of Baker.

Durham asks Horowitz to review “additional phones.”

It's not entirely clear when Durham learned of new phones or made request.
12) Article we wrote on first (Jan 25) Durham filing for additional context.

/End?
theepochtimes.com/durham-court-f…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

Jan 29
1) Based on Durham's new filing it seems Horowitz felt compelled to respond - perhaps because Durham's Jan 25th filing was so damaging.

"After reviewing the Special Counsel’s Office’s public filing, the DOJ Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) brought to our attention..."
2) Horowitz's response as detailed in Durham's new filing appears weak - and does not seem to be backed by much evidence.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3) Horowitz says OIG records show that Baker's two cell phones were "likely" discussed during a call on Feb. 12, 2018.

Durham says he does not remember either this call or the discussion of Baker's cell phones.

Note: OIG did not gain possession of phones until Feb 15, 2018.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 11
We already knew that Daszak continued his work under his NIH grant until April 2020. May even have gone beyond. This was revealed in Daszak's response letter to NIH. See below.

The question is, was ANY work done/funded under Daszak's 2018 proposal.
theepochtimes.com/daszaks-ecohea…
The 2018 proposal, provided by DRASTIC, is separate (technically) from Daszak's NIH-funded work.

2018 proposal (funding denied) contained remarkable similarities to Covid pandemic but the Murphy report needs more vetting from what I've seen.
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
As noted last night, it's entirely possible there's conflation between Dasak's NIH-funded work & his 2018 proposal.

It's also possible that Veritas report is correct but we need more.

Seems almost too neat, too perfect. Raises questions.

Waiting for more info before judgment.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11
This is in direct relation to documents previously released by DRASTIC.

The rejection letter referred to was included in the DRASTIC release.

BUT this does re-raise the very valid question as to why this proposal from Daszak was buried.

See:
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
Note that the DRASTIC release was already authenticated by Linfa Wang, one of the scientists who was involved in Daszak’s proposal.

DRASTIC release here: drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-d…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 5, 2021
Hi @ggreenwald

Important to note that they DID NOT recant within days.

We know because this same group aggressively pushed their Natural Origin narrative to National Academy of Sciences in Feb.

Also, 1st draft of Proximal Origin was completed same day as Fauci Feb 1 call.
This details how Fauci & other scientists tried to shape the narrative of a NASEM response to the White House in Feb 2020.

2 days after Fauci was told it was a lab leak, his group pushed Natural Origin narrative that was written SAME day as Fauci call.
theepochtimes.com/behind-the-sce…
There was a very direct and orchestrated cover-up.

1) Feb 1, 2020 - Fauci told lab leak was 70-80% likely

2) 1st draft of Proximal Origin completed same day

3) Feb 3, 2020 - Fauci presents to NASEM. Daszak & Andersen there

4) Fauci scientists push Natural Origin to NASEM
Read 4 tweets
Nov 21, 2021
1) It's suddenly become conveniently fashionable for the same journalists who promoted Steele's Russia- Collusion nonsense to claim that:

1) They never did any such thing

2) Yes, the dossier was flawed but look at the ICA. Or [fill in blank here]...
2) Or claim that:

1) "The notion that the media started questioning Trump’s ties to Russia because of the Steele dossier is even more preposterous."

Because

2) "The report was faulty, but Trump was very, very guilty."
nymag.com/intelligencer/…
3) The Steele dossier laid groundwork for claims of Russia-Collusion.

And the Intelligence Community Assessment was an attempt by Brennan, Clapper & Comey to fortify those claims - w/ridiculous reports of "Facebook something"

In some respects, the Steele dossier WAS the ICA.
Read 15 tweets
Nov 16, 2021
The latest narrative:

"So many were taken in so easily because the dossier seemed to confirm what they already suspected."

Journalists weren't "taken in".

They worked willfully w/the Clinton campaign & the Intelligence Community overturn an election.
nytimes.com/2021/11/15/opi…
2) As he asks "where did much of the press go wrong?" @bgrueskin inadvertently engages in exactly what he purports to criticize:

"There is no doubt that Mr. Trump had long curried Mr. Putin’s favor"
3) "When a well-known liar tells you that something is false, the instinct is to believe that it might well be true."

"None of this should minimize the endemic and willful deceptions of the right-wing press."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

:(