@memcculloch's #QI and Ultima Thule. The idea with testing new theories is to make bold predictions about the near future that contrast expectations. The power in the best theories is in predicting new facts. space missions give these opportunities. 1/
On New Year's Day 2019, New Horizons will be sending back the first glimpses of a never before seen object, being a "cold" classical KBO. By mainstream science, these should have been orbiting at these distances for billions of years. 2/
The orbit of Ultima Thule is of low eccentricity - that is it is almost circular, and has no gravitational influence from Neptune or any other large body. At the distance it is at it gets so little sunlight that temperatures and time should have reduced everything to solid. 3/
Even supervolatiles should be frozen as it is a relatively small body with no recent source of thermal energy. Except possibly from the minimum acceleration possible dictated by #QI. 4/
My assertion with #QI is that the minimum acceleration requirement will entertain a thermal generation cycle in the minimally accelerated heart of MU69 Ultima Thule. Evidence will be quite clear and will have limited other alternative explanations. 5/
The main evidence of internal energy will be that MU69 will be "impossibly" active for an object of this type and history. Activity may include cometary activities such as an exosphere and jets of gas and/or dust. 6/
Already, the fact that MU69 is a binary, contact or otherwise indicates that it has interacted violently, whether internally or from a related body. Space in the Kuiper Belt and beyond appears to be far too sparsely populated to entertain these kinds of interactions. 7/
My bold prediction for MU69 is thus - Activity in the form of outgassing, jets and exosphere. Somewhat "processed" surface similar to comet surfaces - dark, boulders, spires, limited impact craters. Equatorial features as seen on various moons of Saturn and asteroids. 8/
My thoughts on liquids in outer system objects and incoming long period comets have been bolstered in the theoretical realm by the indirect consequences of #QI. Data from the limits of absurdity in the Ultra cold realm of deep space will bolster these ideas with data! 9/9
This tweet has got quite a lot of attention within the #ActuallyAustistic community, and I thus want to expand on it, tweet by tweet as it is educational for the autistic to help themselves a bit when feeling targeted. 1/
One point of note is that virtually *every* peer group that can be called that has these pecking order rituals/games/measures. Not everyone ends up ever being the weakest link, but virtually every peer group will evict one at some point 2/
Can one "escape" from this game of the weakest link? Can one get a "time out" from being targeted? Not really - If you leave the peer you were probably already the weakest or nearly. If you try to take a time out, this will almost certainly make things worse - 3/
My 10 yo aut dx daughter came crying to me, her #ActuallyAutistic dad, about how she felt picked on by various people in her friendship group at school. After she explained to me the detail, I realised there is an allistic group dynamic, that I call the weakest link syndrome 1/
She didn't understand why the group would settle on physical games like tag, where she was at some disadvantage, and that she would be picked on, even by friends that were picked on themselves. I tried to unpack this for her, as knowing what was happening would help 2/
I know from seeing all sides of multi person interactions in attrition style reality shows such as Big Brother, real life games of the weakest link are in the subconscious nature of the neurotypical brain. Groups of peers sort themselves into a pecking order 3/
By this time in two weeks I will be a guest on the Weekly Space Hangout as a guest thanks to the @wshcrew who invited me youtube.com/channel/UC0-Kk…
Thread 1/7
I am really honoured and I want to tell my story as it relates to space journalism. It all started in 2012 with my obsession with bi-lobed comets and how I thought they came about. Especially in regards to comet 103P Hartley 2 pictured right.
My obsession shifted to the Flagship class mission #Rosetta going to #67P Churyumov-Gerasimenko. I was led to the Rosetta Blog,
blogs.esa.int/rosetta/
where many theories came up in the blog comment threads - Especially comments from @scute1133 regarding "stretch theory"
@memcculloch#QI's idea of mass and inertia contrasts considerably with *the narrative* of particle physics. In particle physics, mass is derived from particle interactions with fields, and scales up from those subatomic processes. 1/
The models associated with particle physics (eg. QCD, the Higgs field and so forth) are derived from extensive empirical experiments. Logically, other models, to be considered, need to concur with the physical experiments. I think #QI is up to the task. 2/
It is not a trivial exercise to separate results of empirical experiment with the interpretation through the "eyes" of the prevailing model. One has to start somewhere and realise that if one particle's experimental results can be explained with QI, then all may be. 3/