1) Spygate: The True Story of Collusion

New @EpochTimes article Plus infographic.
theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-tr…
2) Infographic:

This was a collaborative effort between myself and @JasperFakkert of the @EpochTimes
dropbox.com/s/6lawwm6h8dqz…
3) The intent behind this project was to provide an accessible overview of SpyGate

Including the main players, agencies and departments involved
4) The article walks through the major segments:

Brennan/CIA
FBI
Strzok & Page
DOJ
Rosenstein/McCabe
State Dept
Clinton Campaign & DNC
Perkins Coie
Obama Administration
Media Involvement
Foreign Intelligence
Fusion/Steele
Spy Traps
FISA Abuse
Insurance Policy
5) The Infographic provides a detailing of the major players and connections.

It is not intended to capture every detail but it provides for a visual high-level representation of major segments and players.
6) Each segment is individually explored and many links are provided.

We have attempted to provide a fair amount of detail while allowing for accessibility.
7) Brennan was the point man in the operation to stop a potential Trump presidency.

To embark on such a mission without direct presidential authority seems both an imaginative stretch and particularly foolhardy.
8) Brennan took unofficial foreign intelligence compiled by contacts, colleagues, and associates—primarily from the UK, but also from other Five-Eyes members such as Australia.
theepochtimes.com/the-uk-and-aus…
9) One method used to help establish evidence of collusion was the employment of “spy traps.”

Prominent among these were ones set for Trump campaign advisors George Papadopoulos and Carter Page.
10) The FBI’s involvement appears to have initially come at Brennan’s insistence.

Brennan admitted that his intelligence helped establish the July 31, 2016 FBI Investigation.
11) The FBI would obtain a FISA warrant on Page on October 21, 2016.

The Steele dossier would be the primary evidence

Page, who has steadfastly maintained his innocence, was never charged with any crime.
12) The DOJ, which was fully aware of the actions being taken by James Comey and the FBI, also became an active element acting against members of the Trump Campaign.
13) Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, along with Mary McCord, the Head of the DOJ’s National Security Division, were actively involved in efforts to remove Gen. Michael Flynn.
14) The State Department, with its many contacts, became a conduit for the flow of information.

Transfer of Steele’s first dossier memo was personally facilitated by former Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland.
15) The entire Clinton campaign willfully promoted the narrative of Russia-Trump collusion despite the uncomfortable fact they were the ones who had engaged the services of Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele through their law firm Perkins Coie.
16) The Obama administration provided a simultaneous layer of protection and facilitation for the entire effort.

They also gathered and disseminated intelligence on the Trump team.
17) "Get as much information as you can. Get as much intelligence as you can before President Obama leaves the administration."

"If they found out how we knew what we knew"

"That’s why you have the leaking.”
18) Obama issued a last-minute executive order on Jan. 13, 2017, that altered the line of succession within the DOJ.

The action was not done in consultation with the incoming Trump administration.
19) UK and Australian intelligence agencies also played meaningful roles in the 2016 presidential election.

Britain’s GCHQ was involved in collecting information regarding then-candidate Trump and transmitting it to the United States.
20) Former MI6 Head - Sir Richard Dearlove has ties to many of the parties involved.

It was he who advised Steele and his business partner, Burrows, to work with a top British government official to pass along information to the FBI in the fall of 2016.
21) Trump tweeted “key Allies called to ask not to release” the documents.

How would they know what was contained in these documents?

Britain and Australia don’t want their role in events surrounding the 2016 presidential election to be made public.
22) FISA abuse appears to have played a meaningful role.

“Private contractors had access to raw FISA information on FBI storage systems.”
23) The coming report from the Inspector General is specifically focused on FISA Abuse...
24) In some respects, the media has played the most disingenuous of roles.

Areas of investigation that historically would have proven irresistible to reporters of the past have been steadfastly ignored.
25) The Insurance Policy was the actual process of establishing the Trump–Russia collusion narrative.

It encompassed actions undertaken in late 2016 and early 2017, including leaking the Steele dossier and Clapper’s leaks of Comey’s briefing to President Trump.
26) The intent behind these actions was simple.

The legitimization of the investigation into the Trump campaign.

The strategy involved the recusal of Trump officials with the intent that Andrew McCabe would end up running the investigation.
27) Spygate represents the biggest political scandal in our nation’s history.
28) But a larger question remains:

How long has the US been subject to interference from the intelligence community and our political agencies?

Was the 2016 presidential election a one-time aberration, or is his episode symptomatic of a larger pattern extending back decades?
29) The actions taken in the 2016 election represent a unified reaction of the establishment to a threat posed by a true outsider—a reaction that has come to be known as Spygate.

/End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeff Carlson

Jeff Carlson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @themarketswork

Feb 17
Meanwhile, Baker was asked if this type of interaction with an outside counsel had ever occurred before. In response, Baker admitted that his interaction with Sussmann was singularly unique:

Mr. Baker: I that that’s correct. Sitting here today, that’s the only one I can remember
Sussmann was never interviewed by the FBI, which Baker also found surprising, noting:

“It is logical to me that we [the FBI] would go back and interview [Sussmann].”

Sussmann WAS interviewed by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence on Dec. 18, 2017.
Meadows to Baker:

“Everything about this investigation seems to have been done in an abnormal way, the way that you have gotten the information, the way that Strzok got information, the way that Ohr was used, the way that Perkins Coie actually came in and gave you information.”
Read 7 tweets
Feb 15
Durham Filing Detailing Spying on Trump White House Raises National Security Implications

New from @HansMahncke & Myself
theepochtimes.com/durham-filing-…
Durham also notes an email exchange re: the Alfa allegations involving former Perkins Coie attorney Marc Elias and three Clinton campaign officials: communications director Jennifer Palmieri, Clinton campaign manager Robbie Mook, and senior foreign policy advisor Jake Sullivan.
That email exchange w/Elias, Sullivan, Palmieri and Mook re: the now-disproven Alfa Bank allegations took place on Sep. 15, 2016, only four days before Sussmann took the Alfa information to the FBI.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 2
1) Durham Filing Rebuts Inspector General Horowitz’s Claims on Missing Cellphones, Hints at Growing Rift

Durham-Horowitz: Part II

From @HansMahncke & myself

Thread includes an abbreviated timeline of events, as follows:
theepochtimes.com/durham-filing-…
2) Dec. 17, 2021

Horowitz informed Durham that in March 2017 Sussmann told an OIG SAG that one of his clients had observed that a specific OIG employee’s computer was “seen publicly” in “Internet traffic” and was connecting to a Virtual Private Network in a foreign country.
3) At the time Horowitz provided this report to Durham on December 17, 2021, Horowitz represented to Durham & team that it had “no other file[s] or other documentation” relating to this cyber matter.
Read 12 tweets
Jan 29
1) Based on Durham's new filing it seems Horowitz felt compelled to respond - perhaps because Durham's Jan 25th filing was so damaging.

"After reviewing the Special Counsel’s Office’s public filing, the DOJ Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) brought to our attention..."
2) Horowitz's response as detailed in Durham's new filing appears weak - and does not seem to be backed by much evidence.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3) Horowitz says OIG records show that Baker's two cell phones were "likely" discussed during a call on Feb. 12, 2018.

Durham says he does not remember either this call or the discussion of Baker's cell phones.

Note: OIG did not gain possession of phones until Feb 15, 2018.
Read 10 tweets
Jan 11
We already knew that Daszak continued his work under his NIH grant until April 2020. May even have gone beyond. This was revealed in Daszak's response letter to NIH. See below.

The question is, was ANY work done/funded under Daszak's 2018 proposal.
theepochtimes.com/daszaks-ecohea…
The 2018 proposal, provided by DRASTIC, is separate (technically) from Daszak's NIH-funded work.

2018 proposal (funding denied) contained remarkable similarities to Covid pandemic but the Murphy report needs more vetting from what I've seen.
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
As noted last night, it's entirely possible there's conflation between Dasak's NIH-funded work & his 2018 proposal.

It's also possible that Veritas report is correct but we need more.

Seems almost too neat, too perfect. Raises questions.

Waiting for more info before judgment.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 11
This is in direct relation to documents previously released by DRASTIC.

The rejection letter referred to was included in the DRASTIC release.

BUT this does re-raise the very valid question as to why this proposal from Daszak was buried.

See:
theepochtimes.com/research-propo…
Note that the DRASTIC release was already authenticated by Linfa Wang, one of the scientists who was involved in Daszak’s proposal.

DRASTIC release here: drasticresearch.files.wordpress.com/2021/09/main-d…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(