Health Nerd Profile picture
Nov 14, 2018 38 tweets 9 min read
Today is #WorldDiabetesDay so let's talk diabetes epidemiology

Basically, that means who gets diabetes, what happens to them, and what we can do to prevent it

It's a scary topic 1/
Firstly - what is diabetes?

The WHO defines it as: "A chronic disease that occurs either when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body cannot effectively use the insulin it produces" 2/
There are three main types of diabetes: type 1, type 2, and gestational

Type 1 is an autoimmune condition that has genetic and epigenetic roots

Type 2 is a developed condition that is due to insulin resistance

Gestational is high blood sugar occurring due to/in pregnancy 3/
Generally, we split diabetes up into type 1/2 and gestational, because they are different in many ways

In particular, gestational diabetes is usually transitory, although it may predispose women to type 2 diabetes later in life 4/
When we are talking about diabetes epidemiology - looking at diabetes on a population scale - we are also mostly talking about type 2 diabetes

That's because of the type 1/2 split 5/
Of the people diagnosed with diabetes, about 90% will have type 2 diabetes, with 10% having type 1 6/
This is important because type 2 diabetes is partially preventable, while type 1 is not 7/
Which brings us to the scary part

You see, diabetes rates are increasing 8/
In Australia - where I live - we've gone from an estimated national diabetes rate of ~2% in 1992 to ~6% today in 2018 9/
But this data is problematic: it's either based on self-report (scientists asking people if they have diabetes) or people enrolled in diabetes services 10/
The issue here is that only people who are diagnosed will self-report, or access services

But you can live with type 2 diabetes for years without having any outward signs

What about undiagnosed people? 11/
We aren't entirely sure how many people are living with diabetes without a diagnosis, but recent research has put the figure at 25-50% 12/
So when we look at our diabetes estimates, we have to add at least 25%, and maybe as much as 50%, on!

That means the diabetes prevalence in Australia is probably 8-10%, maybe more 13/
Diabetes is also an unequal issue

What do I mean by that?

Well, people who are disadvantaged - economically, socially, etc - are much more likely to develop type 2 diabetes 14/
Poor, rural areas have diabetes rates up to five times (!) higher than wealthy, urban places

This gets even worse when we look at ethnicity and other cultural barriers 15/
In Australia, Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander peoples see rates of DIAGNOSED diabetes as high as 13%

If you include the undiagnosed population, we're looking at somewhere between 17-21%

This is a major failing of the health system and society 16/
My team has looked at diabetes rates by mapping them across Sydney, and it's fairly easy to see the societal split

Red means more diabetes. You can see a pretty clear divide between the wealthier east and more disadvantaged western suburbs 17/
This burden of diabetes is a big issue. Diabetes is one of the leading risk factors for ill health globally

It causes damage to eyes, kidneys, hearts, and more 18/
It's also very EXPENSIVE. The cost of diabetes to our health system is skyrocketing 19/
These increases in diabetes are largely driven by increases in type 2 diabetes

Type 2 diabetes is largely driven by increases in weight

This brings us back to the "preventable" aspect 20/
We estimate that if we could drop the average weight by about 4kg, we would see dramatic reductions in the rate of diabetes 21/
This is particularly hard, given the social disadvantage angle

It is MUCH easier for people who are wealthy, and can access services, to lose weight (this is what my PhD is on) 22/
It's important to remember that social disadvantage affects all areas of the healthcare system

For example, some of our research has shown that people who speak a language other than English have much worse outcomes when they are admitted to hospital for diabetes 23/
There's also another growing issue

So far I've mostly been talking about type 2 diabetes, but what about gestational? 24/
Research from some of my colleagues has shown that the rate of gestational diabetes has more than doubled in the last decade in western Sydney

This is truly terrifying 25/
(FYI, that graph technically shows total number of GDM pregnancies, but the number of pregnant women has only grown by about 20% since 2002 so it represents a >2x increase in the rate) 26/
Remember: gestational diabetes may be transitory (by definition), but the effects are not

Women with gestational diabetes are more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. The same is true of their children

This makes the problem intergenerational 27/
Even if we intervene today, reduce everyone's weight by 4kg in the next year, we'll still likely see diabetes rates continue to climb for some time yet 28/
But, there is hope!

At the individual level, there are numerous ways to prevent, and even reverse, diabetes 29/
We've now seen several trials show that, if you have type 2 diabetes, you can reverse the disease and go into 'remission' by losing 8-15kg of weight 30/
Similarly, if you have pre-diabetes - an intermediate stage where between normal blood sugar and diabetes - you can reduce your risk of getting diabetes significantly with just a few kilos of weight-loss 31/
From a population perspective, there are proven effective interventions focused on providing a health environment that can reduce the risk of diabetes for everyone 32/
These include things like a sugar tax, improved active transport (like cycling!), reducing barriers to healthy eating, and more 33/
Ultimately, a strategy focused on the individual AND society is vital to reverse the trend in diabetes that we are seeing emerge 34/
What can you do?

1. Advocate for change
2. Find local groups and work with/support them
3. Talk to healthcare providers about setting personal goals
4. ADVOCATE FOR CHANGE 35/
Our diabetes problem has been 30 years in the making

It will not be solved overnight

But the only way we can make a dent is if everyone - from you to the politicians who represent you - cares enough to do things differently 36/
Some useful resources #WorldDiabetesDay

WHO - who.int/news-room/fact…
Diabetes Australia - diabetesaustralia.com.au
Western Sydney Diabetes - westernsydneydiabetes.com.au
AIHW Report - aihw.gov.au/reports/diabet…
Global Estimate of Diabetes - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24300018
Oh also - if you think you might be at risk of diabetes, or are worried about anything you read here, have a chat with your GP

You might need a test, you might not, but your doctor is the best place to go!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Health Nerd

Health Nerd Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GidMK

Feb 22
This is such a beautiful example of how myths begin and spread. An Australian news program called A Current Affair shows ivermectin for a second in a bit about the Queen having COVID-19

Immediately, people assume this is part of her treatment plan
Now, worth noting the report never says this. It simply references "approved treatments" in Australia vaguely, and first shows sotromivab (which IS approved) first, then a quick shot of ivermectin with the voice-over
Indeed, one might consider the fact that ivermectin is SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED in Australia currently as a treatment for COVID-19, so it makes more sense that this would be an error than fact Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 21
It feels like the entirety of the Australian media has been making errors about COVID-19 deaths in the last few days, so here's a brief explanation of the issue 🧵1/10 Image
2/10 The Australian Bureau of Statistics recently released a report looking at registered/reported deaths as of Jan 2022. The numbers don't match crude COVID-19 reporting because this is a more complete system abs.gov.au/articles/covid… Image
3/10 This report is based on death registry systems, which themselves are based largely on death certifications performed by (mostly) doctors. These are assigned ICD-10 codes based on the reported causes of death and comorbidities
Read 13 tweets
Feb 21
Genuinely fascinating study. The authors took a very large representative dataset, and tested a number of hypotheses about drinking and health

Basically, they found that drinking probably doesn't improve health
The study is worth reading, but the main thing that they demonstrated was that using "non-drinkers" as a reference group is very misleading. Most people who NEVER drink avoid alcohol for a reason
Indeed, the group of people who never drank, from the UK Biobank data, had higher rates of almost every chronic disease, and most likely had higher rates of unmeasured diseases too
Read 8 tweets
Feb 4
This paper has been doing the rounds, claiming that lockdown was useless (the source of the 0.2% effect of lockdown claim). Dozens of people have asked my opinion of it, so here we go:

In my opinion, it is a very weak review that doesn't really show much, if anything 1/n Image
2/n The paper is a systematic review performed by three very highly-regarded economists who have also been extremely anti-lockdown since March 2020. You can find it here: sites.krieger.jhu.edu/iae/files/2022…
3/n As others have noted, this is a "working paper", which essentially means it's not peer-reviewed and reflects only the opinions of the three authors named Image
Read 35 tweets
Feb 3
I actually think this study is a really interesting example of how school closures have become a political battleground where scientific evidence largely doesn't matter
No one has ever argued, as far as I know, that ALL homeschooling is bad for kids. The discussion is always around a specific form of homeschooling where underprepared teachers with no resources are forced to homeschool kids during a pandemic
"Closing schools" isn't really about CLOSING the schools, but about whether the relative impact on kids when they learn from home IN A SPECIFIC SITUATION is bad
Read 8 tweets
Feb 2
"Most people who died of COVID-19 have underlying health conditions"

Most people who die OF ANYTHING have underlying comorbidities

MOST ADULTS in many countries have at least 1 underlying health problem!
I mean, obesity is usually defined as a risk factor for Covid-19, as is hypertension. The combined prevalence of just those two issues in many countries is above 1 in 3 adults
Here's an estimate of the "at risk" population from the UK, which aggregated together cancer, heart disease, diabetes, asthma, severe obesity, and CKD. At age ~60, more than half of the population had at least one condition bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(