@aaronjmate Are we now over 50 major news stories that have had to be reracted or seriously corrected, all in the same direction, wrt Russia since 2016?
@aaronjmate I'll start a thread here to count them (I had started one for a CounterPunch article more than a year ago, but gave up partly because the list just kept growing as I tied to write). So:
@aaronjmate 1.1 On July 27, 2016 the @AP falsely reported that RT (formerly Russia Today) is part of the Russian state media complex. While it receives funding from the Russian government, it is a stand alone entity. On August 2, AP issued a correction on top of an accordingly updated story.
@aaronjmate @AP 1.2 The AP has since deleted the story altogether, but it is still visible (uncorrected) in places like this. businessinsider.com/ap-trump-gets-…
Here is the link to the original story, since deleted: bigstory.ap.org/article/8ba26e…
@aaronjmate 2. From July through October, 2016 MSNBC personalities Malcolm Nance and Joy Reid falsely and persistently pushed the line that Clinton related emails from WikiLeaks were or would be faked by Russians. theintercept.com/2016/12/09/a-c…
@aaronjmate 3. Newsweek eventually completely took down the wild Kurt Eichenwald story about Wikileaks, Russia, and Kurt newsweek.com/vladimir-putin…
@aaronjmate 4. The Trump Server/Alfa Bank Russia story was debunked theverge.com/2016/11/1/1348…
5. CNN falsely reported that Russia was closing an Anglo-American school in response to Obama's Russia/Election Hacking sanctions. forbes.com/sites/kenrapoz…
6. A long editor's note to this WaPo PropOrNot article essentially makes the whole think out to be hooey. washingtonpost.com/business/econo…
7. Russia didn't hack the Vermont power grid washingtonpost.com/world/national…
8. Again the @AP had to correct a story, picked up by ABC among others, that said a Russian commander had told a counterpart in the Philippines "You can choose ... to cooperate with United States of America or to cooperate with Russia." NOW DELETED abcnews.go.com/International/…:
@AP 9. The NYT's mangled a story about Abby Martin and Breaking the Set on RT and doesn't get it right even in the corrected version. nytimes.com/2017/01/07/wor…
@AP 10. A CNN Russia/Trump story based on a single anonymous source had to be retracted and led to the resignation of three CNN journalists. money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/med…
@AP 11. An article by Ben Jacobs in the Guardian had to include two major corrections in asserting a long established close tie between Wikileaks and the Putin regime. theguardian.com/media/2016/dec…
@AP 12. Widespread reports that Russia was behind the hack of Macron's emails ahead of French election were debunked by French security forces. apnews.com/fc570e4b400f4c…
13. No, 21 states' voter systems weren't hacked by Russia. theintercept.com/2017/09/28/yet…
14. Russia didn't hack C-Span in spite of initial "confirmation" it had washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wem…
15. The New York Times published a whole, ridiculous opinion piece by Lulzy Mensch nytimes.com/2017/03/17/opi…
16. A NYT article on Lee Camp's Redacted Tonight show on RT had to include multiple corrections but is still riddle with inaccuracies. alternet.org/2017/06/lee-ca…
17. Widespread reports said that Russia had hacked 80 UK Parliamentary email accounts. There was never confirmation and UK intel later said it was actually Iran (but very few outlets with stories still up corrected) theguardian.com/world/2017/oct…
18. Mueller's team didn't specifically debunk the on-again/off-again Michael Cohan in Prague story (from the Steele Dossier), but when it recently reared it's head again, it said that "many" news stories on the Trump-Russia probe are wrong washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/…
19. It went everywhere all the time for a while, but the NYT eventually issued a correction that it was 4 intelligence agencies, not 17 that, to varying degrees, agreed that Russia had interfered in election nytimes.com/2017/06/25/us/…
20. As I've long pointed out, WaPo wrongly attributed a vuln scan of Arizona's election system to Russia. Hackers with Anonymous had claimed the scan looong before the Russia story ever broke.
21. James Comey very publicly said that one of the first huge NYT's stories that initially alleged repeated contacts between the Trump campaign and Russian spies was "in the main ... not true" washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wem…
22. CNN had to issue a major correction to a story that initially claimed Trump Jr. had advance notice of Wikileaks' Podesta email dump. The date of the email in question was off by 10 days. cnn.com/2017/12/08/pol…
23. CNN just completely erased a story about Scaramucci, Trump, and a Russian Bank. So bad a correction simply wasn't possible. independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…
24. CNN, followed by other outlets claiming they had confirmed, falsely said that Cohen would confirm that Donald Trump had advance knowledge of the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting. Most outlets retracted, but not CNN> theintercept.com/2018/08/28/cnn…
25. A live ABC report sent markets into panic when it said it had confirmed that Flynn would testify that Trump instructed him to make contact with Russians during the campaign. ABC had to correct.
26. CNN (again!) said that it had confirmation that Comey would testify that Trump wasn't told multiple times that he wasn't under investigation. Another correction! cnn.com/2017/06/06/pol…
27. NBC news initially suggested that Megyn Kelly had gotten Putin to admit to having compromising material on Trump. Correction!
28. Newsweek retracted a story saying that a Russian influenced bot-network had helped to take down Senator Al Franken newsweek.com/alt-right-trum…
29. Yet again, CNN, but this time they just quietly walked back reporting they'd done on Sessions not properly reporting contacts with Russia he'd had in normal course of being a Senator. foxnews.com/entertainment/…
30. NYT: it wasn't *Russian* oligarchs Manafort sent election data to, it was Ukrainian oligarchs. (Still hasn't fixed the headline 10 days later!). nytimes.com/2019/01/08/us/…
31. NBC: Feds monitored Cohen's phone calls for a long time. Whoops! It was just getting a log of his calls. nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
32. Talking Points Memo wrongly reported that a Russian social media company was cooperating with the Mueller investigation about contacts between one of their executives and the Trump campaign. talkingpointsmemo.com/muckraker/russ…
33. It wasn't Russian supersonic tech in Cuba that disoriented American diplomats it was ... crickets ... no really, crickets. theintercept.com/2019/01/07/nbc…
34. There's yet to be any credible confirmation of this wild Guardian story on Manafort meeting with Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in the UK when there should have been ample confirmation, including video theguardian.com/us-news/2018/n…
35. NPR had to apologize in an editors note after accusing Trump Jr. of lying in testimony to Senate investigators regarding a planned Tump Tower in Moscow. npr.org/2018/11/30/672…
(even the correction there in #35 doesn't note that Trump said "yes" in the same interview to whether discussions continued into 2016) foxnews.com/politics/npr-i…
36. Again the @AP. It had to correct an erroneous report that Steele's Dossier started out funded by the conservative Washington Free Beacon. apnews.com/63c883156e314b…
@AP 37. NBC's Ken Dilanian initially breathlessly reported that Steele knew about the initial DNC hacks before they happened. Steele didn't. Correction needed. nbcnews.com/politics/natio…
@AP 37. (correcting number/threading mistakes) Bloomberg corrected its story to say that Mueller had targeted people near Trump with a Deutsche Bank subpoena, but not before many other outlets ran with story that Mueller had targeted Trump directly bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
The next 4 or 5 were added after reviewing @SharylAttkisson's list of Media Mistakes in the Trump Era sharylattkisson.com/2019/01/18/50-…
38. NYT followed by CNN, Reuters, WaPo reported that Trump had fired Comey after Dep. Dir. Rosenstein requested more funds for Russia investigation. Andrew McCabe testified before Congress that was untrue b/c investigation already "adequately resourced." npr.org/2017/05/11/527…
39.1 NBC reported that Manafort's notes from the now infamous meeting with Russians and Trump Jr. at Trump Tower referred to political "donations" or "donor." NBC corrected after Sen. Grassley confirmed "donation" didn't appear nbcnews.com/news/us-news/m…
39.2 Further reporting by Politico confirmed no damaging info or word "donor" either in the notes politico.com/story/2017/09/…
40. After ABC wrongly reported that Manafort had worked with a Russian Intelligence "official" as recently as the previous week (Nov. 2017), they corrected, fudging the headline and story to "Russian intel-connected individual." abcnews.go.com/Politics/paul-…
41. (So after careful weighing, I added 3 from Sharyl's list, bringing us to 40 plus the latest ... ) Washington Post confirms meaning of Mueller's office rubbishing the BuzzFeed story claiming strong evidence Trump told Cohen to lie under oath. washingtonpost.com/world/national…
42. Now adding this re McFarland quote that NYT's heavily selectively edited. It's clear that in full context it is just a natural to read this as McFarland stating Trump's opponents' view.
43. Crowdstrike's original attribution incl. Russia hacking Ukrainian artillery app. Widely & credulously swallowed by many media outlets & became big dispute between Russiagaters & anti-Russiagaters on left. Anti-Russiagaters right. Crowdstrike retracted. voanews.com/a/cyber-firm-r…
44. CNN, Reuters, and many others have falsely claimed that the Catalan independence movement has been confirmed to result from Russian interference. theintercept.com/2018/04/20/how…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doug Johnson Hatlem

Doug Johnson Hatlem Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djjohnso

Dec 13, 2020
With two more fires reported today in encampments, there have been seven moderately to super suspicious fires in the last seven days in Toronto homeless camps.

Thread:

👇🏻
1. Last Saturday night between 9-10pm a foam dome was lit on fire at HTO Park (Queens Quay and Spadina). Right by fire station. Residents 100% sure it was started purposefully. No one in it at time or injuries. Police attended, took statements, lied to Sun to say did not.
2. On Monday before midnight someone lit a tiny house in Moss Park on fire beginning with tarps on outside/top of structure. Quarrel before loud bang bang. White guy, scruffy beard left scene. Police and fire attended. Police told Sun it remained under investigation.
Read 11 tweets
Dec 8, 2020
Thread with some pics and video from @c_shadowspaces and me while doing a month long count/estimate of those living outdoors (none that would give away secret locations - have some of those too). 👇
This is near where Grant Faulkner died in a fire in Scarborough (led to an inquiry). Someone had camped nearby recently and within a 1/2 kilometre there was a hidden structure replete with an extensive garden.
Fort York (one of about 8 there)
Read 12 tweets
Dec 8, 2020
I want to talk for several tweets about this slide from Gord Tanner @cityoftoronto at yesterday's hearing. And about @JohnTory's false assertion today that there are only about 400 people living outdoors in T.O. @dmrider @CBCLorenda @cathyacrowe @cllrainslie @shelleycarroll 1/
Let's start with the very most basic FACT (as Mary Anne Bedard kept saying yesterday, in a verbal tick repeated often by deputants to poke fun):

To say that there are 400+ tents in parks & transportation right of ways right now but only 400 people living outdoor is risible. 2/
For starters, assuming just 1, or less than 1 person per tent (or similar structure) doesn't work. We'll get to why in a moment. But that also then assumes no one else is homeless and sleeping w/o tent, on grates, in construction sites, doorways, parking garages, TTC cars etc. 3/
Read 23 tweets
Oct 22, 2020
The @CityofToronto is flatly lying, as it has for at least a decade, about shelter space being available for people who are homeless. Today, a naive and unjust judge not only let Toronto get away with those lies, but crapped all over some of Toronto's most vulnerable citizens. 1/
So, here's a little story that shows what those who are homeless and those who advocate for them go through trying to get Shelter beds.

"I had extended the stay at the rooming house near Spadina and Dundas for the woman who had reported a sexual assault on June 19, 2/
as I was concerned that there was no available bed for her in the shelter system. In the afternoon of June 25, I visited that woman at the rooming house near Spadina/Dundas. While I was there, I noticed a young homeless man (Z.R.) hanging around the outside of the building." 3/
Read 17 tweets
Oct 19, 2020
Is 2020 still competitive (RCP) or not really (538)?

2016
Actual Ntnl: Clinton +2.1
RCP Final: Clinton +3.2 (D+1.1)
538 Final: Clinton +3.9 (D+1.8)

2018
Actual House Ntnl: D+8.6%
RCP Final: D+7.3 (R+1.3)
538 Final (polls only): D+10.2 (D+1.6)

Avg Bias
RCP R+0.1%
538 D+1.7% Image
Look, let's be honest:

If Biden is up

4% in Arizona and Florida
6.5% in Pennsylvania
8%, on average, in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan

And within a whisker of Texas

Then 538 is actually being generous when it gives Trump a 12% chance of winning. Image
If, on the other hand:

Biden is up only:

1.5% in Florida
3% in Arizona
3.8% in Pennsylvania
5.2% in Nevada

And an average of 6.5% in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin

While:

Trump leads Texas by 4.4%

Uncertainty remains reasonably large: Image
Read 4 tweets
Feb 17, 2020
1/ Analyses of precinct data in NH suggest risk that fractional counting by machine may have moved results by 3-5% of gap between Sanders and Buttigieg. @jvgraz recently discussed 2016 suspicions per Stanford study (see also my work in CP + w/EJUSA and @LuluFriesdat led study).
2/ We cannot draw a conclusion of suspicion about movement from precincts of 349 or less to 350-1999 for Sanders v. Buttigieg. Comparing hand v. scanner counts? Sanders just did better in smallest townships. (Klobuchar diff. *is* suspicious per multivariate regression analysis.)
3/ I worked with an Ivy League trained prof. who uses quantitative and qualitative data in his research. We controlled for several factors like wealth.

Our data frame: easyupload.io/kwg3v4

Wealth, importantly, only explains about 10% of the variance by precinct size:
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(