I want to talk for several tweets about this slide from Gord Tanner @cityoftoronto at yesterday's hearing. And about @JohnTory's false assertion today that there are only about 400 people living outdoors in T.O. @dmrider @CBCLorenda @cathyacrowe @cllrainslie @shelleycarroll 1/
Let's start with the very most basic FACT (as Mary Anne Bedard kept saying yesterday, in a verbal tick repeated often by deputants to poke fun):

To say that there are 400+ tents in parks & transportation right of ways right now but only 400 people living outdoor is risible. 2/
For starters, assuming just 1, or less than 1 person per tent (or similar structure) doesn't work. We'll get to why in a moment. But that also then assumes no one else is homeless and sleeping w/o tent, on grates, in construction sites, doorways, parking garages, TTC cars etc. 3/
But then, before getting to the FACTS (from City sources no less) suggesting two people per tent is the norm, lets also turn to City funded agencies that cover Scarborough, North York, and Etobicoke-York in their catchments: 4/
In November, I spoke with managers & workers at both Agincourt Community Centre and Albion. Agincourt's City funded outreach covers Scarborough and North York east to west to Jane. Albion covers Etobicoke-York west to east to Jane, Parkdale, and Midtown in tandem with S2H. 5/
The City, in the graphic above, has 9 sites 15 tents for Scarborough. That is likely v low (@c_shadowspaces and I have visited 4 regular tenting sites in Oct & Nov) with a total of 10-12 tents depending. Agincourt told me directly that their numbers are 50-80 in Scarborough. 6/
The City has 8 sites 16 tents (so apparently just 16 people) down for North York. Agincourt told me the numbers are 30-60 for North York with "exponential" growth in homelessness due to evictions right now. So in these two areas, City numbers are off by 2x to 5x actual. 7/
I also spoke with Albion. Gratefully, they broke out their numbers for Etobicoke-York such that I wouldn't have overlap with other organizations doing good work in Parkdale. Albion says there are 40 people outdoors and homeless in E-Y. The City graphic has 7 sites, 10 tents. 8/
Besides Sanctuary where @c_shadowspaces and I work (which does outreach throughout Toronto and East York as outlined by this graphic), Greg and I spoke to four other organizations about numbers that do outdoor outreach in this catchment area. 9/
As a side note, Albion's numbers were similar for Parkdale and Midtown for what I have from these other organizations. The total for this whole area (Toronto/East York - which I have broken down into Parkdale, Downtown, East York, Beaches) is a minimum of 800 people outdoors. 10/
The minimum for all of these areas then is about 900. I have argued in this thread for a minimum of 200 people forced to make TTC their primarily place of sleep. Even cutting that number in 1/2, we are still to 1000 minimum without home or shelter in Toronto. 11/
All of this is the bare minimum really. I can make reasonable data cases for closer to 2000 people outdoors in two other ways. For this minimum 1000 number, there is also an easy way to make the case that there are two people per tent, on average: 12/
We have good numbers for at least three encampment clearings since COVID-19 started that strongly suggest that 2 people per tent is average, if not a low figure.

Here's @kristynwongtam stating that there were about 60 tents on June 28 in Moss Park per Fred Victor: 13/
(My count around same time was similar. CBC reported 50 tents a week or two earlier.)

Just after that? The City said it put 140 people into hotels. And that didn't clear everyone. There were still about 12 tents left with the people who refused/sued. 14/ cbc.ca/news/canada/to…
There were <40 tents at Sanctuary (I didn't have an exact count due to being on vacay right before clearing-other factors meant fewer people than previous incl a fire & multiple sexual assaults just before clearing), but City said moved 60+ to hotels. 15/ cbc.ca/news/canada/to…
So that's a 2.5+ average per tent for Moss Park, 1.7+ or so for Sanctuary. And we also have Little Norway Park's clearing. The City says it moved 25 people to hotels on June 10, but there were just 12 tents per my count (which I did up a crude drawing for @ESN_TO ahead of) 16/
So let's say the @cityoftoronto @JohnTory count of 400+ tents is accurate. Clearly that means 800 or more people in tents + minimum 200+ outdoors/TTC w/o tents. 17/
This tracks with the figures we get from outreach organizations covering every square inch of the City except the Islands. We therefore have two independently, quite reliable ways to get to 1000+ minimum for people w/o home or shelter in Toronto right now. 18/
But the City is planning space for just 560 people (many of which are now open and occupied - the Better Living Center's 100 spaces are now full, for instance, per data received yesterday). 19/
The @CityofToronto, Gord Tanner, Mary-Anne Bedard, @JohnTory, @shelleycarroll, @joe_cressy etc. also acknowledged an eye-popping stat yesterday. Toronto is producing about 600 new homeless people a month. 560 spaces (filling up already) isn't going to cut it. 20/
We have 1000+ (maybe 2000) outdoors in tents or otherwise or on TTC for their regular sleeping. Toronto is producing another 600 homeless per month. Hotel-shelters have about a 50% retention rate (per same presentation). Evictions from housing are ramped up. #DisasterLooms 21/21
(I should add that @c_shadowspaces and I visited more than 40 sites with over 340 tents or similar structures total between mid October and mid November for this count. We visited for 1st time or revisited 85% of these tents between Nov 15-18.)
Separate thread ... scroll through pics and video. We went everywhere hunting down tent locations (the ones we think likely really hidden from the City aren’t here or are done in a way to not give away location).

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doug Johnson Hatlem

Doug Johnson Hatlem Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @djjohnso

13 Dec
With two more fires reported today in encampments, there have been seven moderately to super suspicious fires in the last seven days in Toronto homeless camps.

Thread:

👇🏻
1. Last Saturday night between 9-10pm a foam dome was lit on fire at HTO Park (Queens Quay and Spadina). Right by fire station. Residents 100% sure it was started purposefully. No one in it at time or injuries. Police attended, took statements, lied to Sun to say did not.
2. On Monday before midnight someone lit a tiny house in Moss Park on fire beginning with tarps on outside/top of structure. Quarrel before loud bang bang. White guy, scruffy beard left scene. Police and fire attended. Police told Sun it remained under investigation.
Read 11 tweets
8 Dec
Thread with some pics and video from @c_shadowspaces and me while doing a month long count/estimate of those living outdoors (none that would give away secret locations - have some of those too). 👇
This is near where Grant Faulkner died in a fire in Scarborough (led to an inquiry). Someone had camped nearby recently and within a 1/2 kilometre there was a hidden structure replete with an extensive garden.
Fort York (one of about 8 there)
Read 12 tweets
22 Oct
The @CityofToronto is flatly lying, as it has for at least a decade, about shelter space being available for people who are homeless. Today, a naive and unjust judge not only let Toronto get away with those lies, but crapped all over some of Toronto's most vulnerable citizens. 1/
So, here's a little story that shows what those who are homeless and those who advocate for them go through trying to get Shelter beds.

"I had extended the stay at the rooming house near Spadina and Dundas for the woman who had reported a sexual assault on June 19, 2/
as I was concerned that there was no available bed for her in the shelter system. In the afternoon of June 25, I visited that woman at the rooming house near Spadina/Dundas. While I was there, I noticed a young homeless man (Z.R.) hanging around the outside of the building." 3/
Read 17 tweets
19 Oct
Is 2020 still competitive (RCP) or not really (538)?

2016
Actual Ntnl: Clinton +2.1
RCP Final: Clinton +3.2 (D+1.1)
538 Final: Clinton +3.9 (D+1.8)

2018
Actual House Ntnl: D+8.6%
RCP Final: D+7.3 (R+1.3)
538 Final (polls only): D+10.2 (D+1.6)

Avg Bias
RCP R+0.1%
538 D+1.7% Image
Look, let's be honest:

If Biden is up

4% in Arizona and Florida
6.5% in Pennsylvania
8%, on average, in Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan

And within a whisker of Texas

Then 538 is actually being generous when it gives Trump a 12% chance of winning. Image
If, on the other hand:

Biden is up only:

1.5% in Florida
3% in Arizona
3.8% in Pennsylvania
5.2% in Nevada

And an average of 6.5% in Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin

While:

Trump leads Texas by 4.4%

Uncertainty remains reasonably large: Image
Read 4 tweets
17 Feb
1/ Analyses of precinct data in NH suggest risk that fractional counting by machine may have moved results by 3-5% of gap between Sanders and Buttigieg. @jvgraz recently discussed 2016 suspicions per Stanford study (see also my work in CP + w/EJUSA and @LuluFriesdat led study).
2/ We cannot draw a conclusion of suspicion about movement from precincts of 349 or less to 350-1999 for Sanders v. Buttigieg. Comparing hand v. scanner counts? Sanders just did better in smallest townships. (Klobuchar diff. *is* suspicious per multivariate regression analysis.)
3/ I worked with an Ivy League trained prof. who uses quantitative and qualitative data in his research. We controlled for several factors like wealth.

Our data frame: easyupload.io/kwg3v4

Wealth, importantly, only explains about 10% of the variance by precinct size:
Read 5 tweets
21 Jan
#10at10 No. 48
2020 Dem Primary Rankings
Full Delegate Proj.➡️Super Tues:
wp.me/P7gBVo-yC

-Warren up 15 delgs., Sanders, Biden, Buttigieg down 7, 7, and 1 respectively
-Sanders now within 0.4% of Biden in polling v. Trump avg., closest in my tracking over a year Image
#10at10 No. 49
2020 Dem Primary Rankings
Full Delegate Proj.➡️Super Tues:
wp.me/P7gBVo-yC

-At 1.1 pt deficit, closest Sanders has been to Biden (also -1.1 Apr 1)
-Bloomberg steadily rising
-Deleg count hidden, updates tonight (IA NH NV SC), throughout week (Super Tues) Image
#10at10 No. 50
2020 Dem Primary Rankings
Full Delegate Proj.➡️Super Tues:
(Updating tonight)
wp.me/P7gBVo-yC

-Sanders takes the lead in polling, delegates, and overall rank for first time going back to Jan. 2019
-Full Delg. Projection later tonight (could move a few) Image
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!