, 10 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
1. Howard Schultz's interview on NPR this morning revealed his candidacy to be, incredibly, even dumber than what it seemed so far.

Let's explore...

npr.org/2019/01/28/689…
2. Schultz touts his work creating a good corporate citizen in Starbucks as what he'd bring to the presidency. Inskeep asks if he'd change laws or SEC regulations to diminish primacy of share price as a value for corporations. Schultz answers...
3. "I don't think I would be changing laws, but what I would try and do is influence public CEOs to understand that we have a moral obligation...to do more for our employees and the communities we serve." Oh, you'll "influence" them? By doing what? Making some speeches?
4. Pressed on that, Schultz says, "A company has to perform. But you don't have to perform at the expense of your people." Great. But what would you do AS PRESIDENT to make that happen? He seems not even to have thought about it.
5. He says the national debt is a crushing problem. How do you solve it, he's asked. "We are in dire need of comprehensive tax reform. Which would include a significant level of infrastructure development."
[face palm]
Infrastructure is not taxes.
6. Would the wealthy have to pay more in his reform? "What I would say is that we need comprehensive tax reform. Because I think there are a number of areas here that need to be addressed." In other words, he has no idea what he wants to do.
7. But he does think Elizabeth Warren's wealth tax is a horrific idea. "We can't just attack these things in a punitive way by punishing people." Ah yes, we must not punish the noble job creators by taxing them too much. Onward...
8. Inskeep notes that if he cares so much about the deficit, now headed toward $1 trillion, he'll have to make tough choices. Cuts to popular programs, tax increases? "You haven't talked about growth," Schultz says.
9. How will Schultz create fantastic growth? "I've been an entrepreneur for the last 40 years. I view things a little bit differently than certainly a traditional politician. And I have a 30 year plus record of being able to solve complex problems in unique ways." Oh.
10. So to sum up, Schultz plainly has no idea how government works, and doesn't demonstrate any interest in finding out, but he does think that because he was successful in business he'd naturally be successful running the government. Sounds like somebody else I can think of.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Paul Waldman
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!