,
4 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
Actually that post holds up quite well, thank you. (I’d encourage everyone to read it!) I’d also invite everyone to read your contemporaneous effort to debunk it. Can you share that link to? But again, you still seem stuck on the logic of what an investigation is.
2/ Your claim is that the Mueller Probe has fully exonerated President Trump. And yet you also claim the investigation was a fraud. There are several logical problems with this formulation. If you believe it exonerated him how can the investigation have been a fraud?
3/ If your premise is correct, Mueller set up to investigate a question, found no evidence of a crime and then exonerated a Trump. That is what an investigation is supposed to do if there’s no underlying wrongdoing. We could diagram this as a sentence with predicates and ...
4/ deductions and that might help.
