With Aston Villa and Derby County facing each other in today’s Championship play-off final for promotion to the Premier League, let’s take a closer look at what has been described as the most lucrative match in world football. Some thoughts in the following thread #AVFC#DCFC
The Championship play-off winners will receive nearly £180m TV money over the next 3 seasons: at least £97m from the Premier League in 2019/20 (based on 20th place), then £78m parachute payments (2 years if relegated after one season in the PL) plus £5m EFL distribution.
The losers of the Championship play-off will receive around £20m over next 3 seasons: £13.5m Premier League solidarity payments (£4.5m a year) plus £6.9m EFL central distribution (£2.3m a year). So the difference between winning and losing this match is £160m (£180m less £20m).
If the winners of the play-off final avoid relegation in their first season, they will get at least £300m TV money over 5 years, including £93m parachute payments (3 years in this case). This is around £266m more than £34m earned over the same period in the Championship.
It is worth noting that these estimates are based on the promoted club finishing either bottom or just outside the relegation zone, but they could earn a lot more if they finish higher in the league table, e.g. #WWFC received £127m TV money for finishing 7th in 2018/19.
The increase in TV money compared to this season is different for the two play-off clubs, as #AVFC had a (final) parachute payment of £15.5m in 2018/19, while #DCFC only had a £4.5m solidarity payment. Therefore, the #DCFC YoY increase of £90m would be higher than #AVFC £79m.
So the size of the increase following promotion is dependent on whether a club has a parachute payment – and which year. If a club is promoted in the first season after relegation from the Premier League, the YoY increase would “only” be £52m (£97m less £43m parachute & £2m EFL).
Of course, it is this enormous disparity in TV money that helps explains why so many Championship clubs “go for it” and then post substantial losses. It is perhaps understandable that some owners get a little giddy at the prospect of going from £8m TV money to £100-150m.
There is less focus on promotion impact on the bottom line, but it is evident that wages also explode in the top flight. That said, all 3 clubs promoted in 2016/17 swung from large losses to solid profits, showing significant improvements: #NUFC £70m, #BHAFC £51m & #HTAFC £49m.
Furthermore, even though losses are increasing in the Championship, the improvements after promotion appear to be on the rise. In 2016/17 operating profits improved by an average of £38m, while this was up to £67m in 2017/18 (£47m even excluding #NUFC huge £108m gain).
The size of the revenue increase after promotion for individual clubs largely depends on whether they have benefited from parachute payments in the Championship, but the average in 2017/18 was around £104m (nearly 250%) with the highest increase of £110m coming from #BHAFC.
Obviously, TV money is the main driver of growth following promotion, but there are also increases in the other revenue streams. In 2017/18 #NUFC and #HTAFC growth of £14m and £7m respectively was almost all commercial, while #BHAFC £8m was split between commercial and match day.
The need to compete means that wages also take off after promotion. In 2016/17 all 3 clubs doubled wage bills with an average increase of £33m. This was even higher in 2017/18 at #BHAFC £46m & #HTAFC £41m, while NUFC low growth was due to the highest ever Championship wage bill.
So, there we have it, the description of the “£170m match” is a little simplistic, but it is still true that there is a huge amount of money at stake in the Championship Play-Off final. Of course, it is then up to the winner to spend it wisely – and there’s no guarantee of that.
The other way to look at this is that both clubs *really* need promotion. #AVFC parachute payments have finished, while #DCFC had to sell (and lease back) their stadium to meet the EFL’s Profitability and Sustainability targets. May the best team win.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
While Manchester City have hit some bad form on the pitch recently, their financial results for the 2023/24 season were pretty impressive, featuring a new Premier League revenue record of £715m and a substantial £74m profit #MCFC
City's revenue slightly increased to £715m, which means that this has risen by more than a third (£180m) in just five years from the 2019 pre-pandemic level of £535m. Growth has been led by commercial, which now accounts for 48% of total income #MCFC
Player trading has become increasingly important to City, having made £122m in 2022/23 and £139m in 2023/24. Up until 2019/20 the club had not generated more than £40m, so they have significantly improved this area of their operations #MCFC
Review of Rangers' financial results for the 2023/24 season, when when they finished as runners-up in the SPFL Premiership for the third year in a row, were defeated in the Scottish Cup Final, but did win the League Cup. Also reached the Europa League last 16 #RangersFC
After two years of small losses, when they very nearly broke-even, Rangers lost £17m before tax, mainly because profit from player sales dropped from £24m to £6m #RangersFC
Rangers' revenue rose £4.5m (5%) from £83.8m to a club record £88.3m, which means that this has grown by an impressive £35.1m (66%) in the last five years from £53.2m #RangersFC
Review of Manchester United's financial results for the 2023/24 season. As always, #MUFC are the first Premier League club to publish their accounts.
The period included official confirmation of the deal whereby Sir Jim Ratcliffe acquired a 27.7% stake in United.
On the plus side, revenue rose £14m (2%) from £648m to a new club record of £662m, while profit from player sales increased from £20m to £37m, United's best result for 15 years #MUFC
However, the pre-tax loss quadrupled, widening by £98m from £33m to £131m, the second worst in United’s history. Club has posted a loss 5 years in a row, compared to healthy profits in five of the six years up to 2018/19 #MUFC
A deep dive into this summer's transfer window, focusing on the Premier League, but also looking at the other major leagues.
Chelsea had the highest gross transfer spend in the Premier League for the third year in a row, i.e. ever since the Clearlake Capital crew arrived, with a hefty £265m.
Lowest gross spends were at Manchester City £25m and Liverpool £43m.
#CFC #MCFC #LFC
However, Chelsea once again had the highest player sales of £186m, followed by Aston Villa £172m and Manchester City £168m.
#CFC #AVFC #MCFC
As Sunderland prepare for the new season, I took a look at the club's focus on sustainability. How close are they to achieving this and what are the implications for the performance on the pitch? #SAFC
The last available accounts from the 2022/23 season are now a full year out of date, but they still offer some indications of how well the strategy is working #SAFC
The bad news is that Sunderland have reported losses 17 years in a row, adding up to a hefty £272m. However, more positively, the club has drastically reduced the size of its losses, averaging less than £7m in the last four years, compared to £20m in the preceding decade #SAFC
A review of Ipswich Town's finances, as they return to the Premier League after 22 long years away. Focus is on the latest available accounts from 2022/23, but also has comparisons with Championship clubs and some estimates for the top flight #ITFC
Losses have been growing under the new owners, as they invested in the squad and infrastructure in an attempt to return Ipswich to former glories - which has clearly worked #ITFC
Even though they were in League One, 2022/23 was the first time that the club broke through the £20m revenue barrier since the last time that they were in the Premier League back in 2001/02 #ITFC