1. If you owned a vast collection of brands, and were aggregating ALL of them into one pricey, direct-to-consumer offering, would you choose to name that offering after just ONE of the brands?
2. Isn't there enough brand confusion already with HBO Now/HBO Go?
Disney continues censoring their classic films to meet contemporary standards. This time it’s #ToyStory 2 (1999).
I know @WarnerMediaGrp thinks @HBO is its premier brand. But for much of this country, HBO = adult-skewing programming they don't want in their home. #HBOMax
The same month @HBO airs a "teen melodrama" w/ "the most male nudity" in TV history, they announce a *general interest* streaming service using the HBO brand.
That demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding of this country as a whole. #HBOMax
Branding the #WarnerMedia streaming service as a variation of @HBO is hugely confusing for a general audience that doesn't know — or care, frankly — that the same company owns FRIENDS, CASABLANCA and Batman. #HBOMax
Calling the #WarnerMedia streaming service #HBOMax implies that it will have the sensibility, content and tone of @HBO.
In no way does it suggest an offering that represents the full breadth of the company. It implies that iconic brands like Warner Bros are secondary.
Two logo montages appear in the sizzle reel for the #HBOMax streaming service.
NBC's streaming service will launch April, 2020 — but unlike #DisneyPlus, #HBOMax, @CBSAllAccess and other branded services, it will be *free* (with ads)
It's well done, but how much pre-1990 content do you see?
I see one pre-1990 live action release in the #DisneyPlus sizzle reel:
Mary Poppins (1964)
And the following animated films:
Snow White (1937)
Fantasia (1940)
Cinderella (1950)
Peter Pan (1953)
Sleeping Beauty (1959)
101 Dalmatians (1961)
Jungle Book (1967)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh