Let's ignore the funny parts for now, like "we're really really a non-profit because we'll figure out how to make less money later" or "we want to keep America competitive by setting up shop in Switzerland."
The crux of the issue is that Marcus has no idea what he is building, while also conflating FOSS with open permissionless systems. @Libra_ can't be everything for everyone, and it can't be both open and closed at the same time.
"We open sourced it (Libra Network) and as a result it doesn’t belong to us anymore. It is now belonging to the community and they will help build the code and we will relinquish control over both the codebase and network through the process."
If this statement is really true, then a dev team will be able to remove the KYC/AML components in a non-Calibra wallet, and still be able to interact freely with the network aside from on and off ramps.
Which would effectively render this statement void: "Wallets will enforce the sanctions that are led by our national security apparatus and treasury." The senators were so close in their questioning. If they connected these two points, it would have been much more interesting.
The only way for Libra to guarantee compliance in all areas is for it to be in complete control. You can't have only Calibra wallets requiring authenticated government ID's but not others. Only way it would work is with two pools of currency that are not allowed to intermingle.
But then you would end up with a very non-fungible currency that definitely isn't a "simple global currency and financial infrastructure that empowers billions of people."
"Sorry, I only accept clean Libras in this store." 🙄
"We wanted to ensure people, as long as they have a legitimate use of the product, can do what they want with their money."
Then you have the the problem of what is legitimate use, which is the same problem all centralized systems like PayPal already have.
Anytime you open the "legitimate use" door, it's all over. If the Libra Association decides x is not legitimate use, your money gets frozen or you get de-platformed. The senator concerned about center-right usage was so close to the mark.
It's good though that Marcus said "we will take the time to get this right." Once Libra is compliant with every jurisdiction, it will just be a more complex PayPal governed by an association.
The #UASF was a defining event of #Bitcoin. 2 years later we may forget what the movement looked like early on. It was never a sure thing. Many people were confused & felt powerless in the face of what looked like massive support for a forced protocol change (NYA/#SegWit2x).
In fact many thought that #Bitcoin was over as we knew it. How could anyone (or any group) go up against such an overwhelming amount of hashrate and corporate backing? It looked like an impossible battle. But Bitcoin and Bitcoiners exist for impossible battles. #RememberTheUASF
All revolutionary movements start small. People started to organize & coordinate. Code was written. Memes were made. Hats were manufactured. Momentum started to build. Eventually the #UASF won the day. It was never a sure thing but we were 100% committed and that’s what mattered.
1/ The reason people are confused about what's going on and can't find the trail is simply because @TheBlueMatt is being dramatic. I wasn't going respond directly because it's so stupid, but it would be worse to not clarify and invite speculation. 🤦♂️ #BitcoinDrama
2/ By making a massive deal out of blocking me (Matt, you couldn’t just write it, but had to take a screenshot of Twitter UI showing the block - which is literally TEXT in a blue bar), people are wondering if I kicked his dog or worse. Now there’s a CoinDesk article. Geez.
3/ The starting point was this thread from @nwoodfine
. TL;DR: #Bitcoin is very important, attracts scammers and frauds, & a culture has evolved to defend against bad actors / attacks. He went on to say if you can't accept that culture then too bad.
Just for fun I'm going to answer one of the brand new accounts spreading FUD about the #LiquidNetwork. Liquid is an inter-exchange settlement network - that means it's for exchanges, OTCs, traders, market makers etc. L-BTC isn't for putting into cold storage for your descendants.
Liquid is designed to solve a problem: moving large amounts of BTC very fast and reliably. On-chain transactions are prone to variance and exchanges typically require more than 1 confirmation, so full settlement can take an hour or more. Full settlement in L-BTC is minutes.
Bitcoin is trustless and permissionless. Corrrect! Liquid sits on top of Bitcoin and uses a distributed trust model. If you're a trader (remember what Liquid is for) you trust the exchange with custody of your coins while trading - so now you trust a federation of exchanges.