1. Democrats, in general, want to spend more, and Republicans less. This deal spends more, despite a Republican president and Senate. On governing, a win for Dems.
2. The political analysis presumes whichever party holds the presidency when the debt limit ceiling is reaching is being handed a live grenade.
This is nonsense. Debt limit "hostage takings" are rare, and do not necessarily succeed...
...Yes, Republicans played a relatively strong hand in 2011 to force budget cuts. But Republicans got less than zilch for the 2013 shutdown, because they were getting killed in the polls and flinched as the debt limit approached, partially undoing the 2011 cuts...
...So you can't score pushing the debt limit to 2021 as a political win for Republicans or Democrats, because there are way too many unknowns, as to who will have leverage and how that leverage will be used...
...Moreover, what was the alternative? Demanding a six-year debt limit suspension? That would be a Senate non-starter. Should Democrats have *caused* a debt limit crisis over such a demand? That would be a bigger political dud than the 2013 shutdown over defunding ACA...
...These complaints have similar overtones of the '10 2-year tax cut extension criticism, in which some accused Obama of frittering away leverage, when in fact, he pocketed stimulus, played for time and eventually gained leverage to raise taxes on the wealthy...
...One last point: the 2013 shutdown debacle allowed Democrats to win on the principle that *hostage taking is bad governing* and it hasn't happened since. It's a principle Democrats should continue to embrace...
...If Republicans try to violate that principle in 2021 under a Democratic president, Democrats can and should welcome that fight...
...In sum, Democrats pocketed $$$ today and saved the politics, if there will be any, for 2021. A good deal for stable governance.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
...Maher mocks Dems for welcoming Liz Cheney's criticism of Trump & the 1/6 riot
Just 3 months ago Maher delivered a heart-stopping monologue about Trump's "slow moving coup" where he praised Cheney for voting to impeach & lamented she was DOA in the GOP
Maher says "San Francisco has basically legalized shoplifting" (using a Oct. WSJ headline calling SF a "Shoplifter’s Paradise" as a visual-not a news headline, an opinion headline)
"I have requested that the Rules Committee explore ... a rule that advances both the budget RESOLUTION and the bipartisan infrastructure package" (emphasis mine)
The budget resolution is going to effectively determine the infrastructure toplines. And House isn't going to directly weigh in.
Point for Team Manchin.
@lindsemcpherson Why isn't the House putting forth their own resolutions? Because it would be too hard to reach consensus: "The panel's chairman, John Yarmuth, D-Ky., had hinted as much earlier in the week, noting the split within his party on the subject..."
Disunity weakens leverage...
The Senate is also not unified: "[Yarmuth] heard that Sanders is struggling to unify his committee around a proposal. Yarmuth said he was told that Sanders has only locked in support of nine of the 11 Democrats on [the budget cmte]"...
They tried to get around the 67-vote cloture threshold through a "nuclear option" maneuver (though it wasn't called that), blowing past cloture and overruling a point of order by simple majority...
Cato's (talking) filibusters were not designed to foster compromise. They were obstructionist tactics designed to stop wealth consolidation and authoritarianism.
He tried to slow Caesar's roll. When he failed, rather than live under Caesar's rule, he killed himself...