Bill Scher Profile picture
Jul 23, 2019 11 tweets 2 min read
This analysis is all politics and no governing, and the political analysis is bad. A short thread...
1. Democrats, in general, want to spend more, and Republicans less. This deal spends more, despite a Republican president and Senate. On governing, a win for Dems.
2. The political analysis presumes whichever party holds the presidency when the debt limit ceiling is reaching is being handed a live grenade.

This is nonsense. Debt limit "hostage takings" are rare, and do not necessarily succeed...
...Yes, Republicans played a relatively strong hand in 2011 to force budget cuts. But Republicans got less than zilch for the 2013 shutdown, because they were getting killed in the polls and flinched as the debt limit approached, partially undoing the 2011 cuts...
...So you can't score pushing the debt limit to 2021 as a political win for Republicans or Democrats, because there are way too many unknowns, as to who will have leverage and how that leverage will be used...
...Moreover, what was the alternative? Demanding a six-year debt limit suspension? That would be a Senate non-starter. Should Democrats have *caused* a debt limit crisis over such a demand? That would be a bigger political dud than the 2013 shutdown over defunding ACA...
...These complaints have similar overtones of the '10 2-year tax cut extension criticism, in which some accused Obama of frittering away leverage, when in fact, he pocketed stimulus, played for time and eventually gained leverage to raise taxes on the wealthy...
...which I wrote about here politico.com/magazine/story… ...
...One last point: the 2013 shutdown debacle allowed Democrats to win on the principle that *hostage taking is bad governing* and it hasn't happened since. It's a principle Democrats should continue to embrace...
...If Republicans try to violate that principle in 2021 under a Democratic president, Democrats can and should welcome that fight...
...In sum, Democrats pocketed $$$ today and saved the politics, if there will be any, for 2021. A good deal for stable governance.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bill Scher

Bill Scher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @billscher

Jan 30
Maher is doubling down on smearing Democrats and caricaturing them as loony leftists.

As I wrote in November, Maher's smears rely on falsehoods and misleading data points washingtonmonthly.com/2022/01/17/new…

But a couple things to note about this new hit job...
...Maher mocks Dems for welcoming Liz Cheney's criticism of Trump & the 1/6 riot

Just 3 months ago Maher delivered a heart-stopping monologue about Trump's "slow moving coup" where he praised Cheney for voting to impeach & lamented she was DOA in the GOP
Maher says "San Francisco has basically legalized shoplifting" (using a Oct. WSJ headline calling SF a "Shoplifter’s Paradise" as a visual-not a news headline, an opinion headline)

He left out that in Dec. SF's mayor announced a crime crackdown sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2021/12/15/may…
Read 10 tweets
Sep 28, 2021
I've been telling y'all for a loooong time:

Pelosi has a history of walking back an initial progressive demand in pragmatic deference to the Senate.

And she signaled back in June that the initial linkage demand wasn't all that firm in the first place.

Here's my own recap...
...June 30 is when I first saw Pelosi define the linkage demand in looser terms than generally assumed...

...Pelosi's spox quickly pushed back on me in a quote tweet, but didn't actually debunk the point...
Read 14 tweets
Aug 15, 2021
"I have requested that the Rules Committee explore ... a rule that advances both the budget RESOLUTION and the bipartisan infrastructure package" (emphasis mine)

I told y'all 6 wks ago washingtonmonthly.com/2021/07/02/nan… Pelosi had in mind tying BIB to the resolution, not reconciliation...
...To refresh, on June 30 I flagged comments from Pelosi that gave her wiggle room to treat the resolution as sufficient for moving forward on BIB...
...Pelosi's spox quickly reacted to that tweet to say "No change in position here"...
Read 10 tweets
Jul 1, 2021
House punting the budget resolution to the Senate, reports @lindsemcpherson rollcall.com/2021/07/01/hou…

The budget resolution is going to effectively determine the infrastructure toplines. And House isn't going to directly weigh in.

Point for Team Manchin.
@lindsemcpherson Why isn't the House putting forth their own resolutions? Because it would be too hard to reach consensus: "The panel's chairman, John Yarmuth, D-Ky., had hinted as much earlier in the week, noting the split within his party on the subject..."

Disunity weakens leverage...
The Senate is also not unified: "[Yarmuth] heard that Sanders is struggling to unify his committee around a proposal. Yarmuth said he was told that Sanders has only locked in support of nine of the 11 Democrats on [the budget cmte]"...
Read 4 tweets
Jun 7, 2021
Some *major* historical context missing here

Byrd backed a compromise lowering cloture threshold to 60 for legislation while *keeping* it at 67 for rules changes

Byrd voted *against* a nuclear option attempt, which would be needed to lower the threshold to 55

Story time...
In February 1975, a bipartisan coalition led by Walter Mondale and James Pearson proposed lowering cloture to 60 across the board...

legislativeprocedure.com/blog/2019/3/8/…
They tried to get around the 67-vote cloture threshold through a "nuclear option" maneuver (though it wasn't called that), blowing past cloture and overruling a point of order by simple majority...
Read 29 tweets
Jun 7, 2021
The filibuster didn't start to foster bipartisanship, and it didn't start to perpetuate slavery or Jim Crow.

It started in Ancient Rome.

I explain here
realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/… but first a thread...
The person who deserves the most credit for inventing the filibuster is Cato the Younger, though the Romans called it "diem consumere" or to consume the day. (See @GoodmanRob1 & @jimmyasoni theatlantic.com/politics/archi… & politico.com/magazine/story… ) ...
Cato's (talking) filibusters were not designed to foster compromise. They were obstructionist tactics designed to stop wealth consolidation and authoritarianism.

He tried to slow Caesar's roll. When he failed, rather than live under Caesar's rule, he killed himself...
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(