...Maher mocks Dems for welcoming Liz Cheney's criticism of Trump & the 1/6 riot
Just 3 months ago Maher delivered a heart-stopping monologue about Trump's "slow moving coup" where he praised Cheney for voting to impeach & lamented she was DOA in the GOP
Maher says "San Francisco has basically legalized shoplifting" (using a Oct. WSJ headline calling SF a "Shoplifter’s Paradise" as a visual-not a news headline, an opinion headline)
Maher criticizes the "Biden infrastructure bill" for a new regulation requiring automakers to install in new cars "an alert system that goes off when you leave a baby in the back seat, which is something done only by crackheads and people who sadly, yes, do it on purpose"...
...he then complains that "every one of us will end up bearing the cost" even though "crackheads and people who do it on purpose" will do it anyway...
...First, it's not the "Biden infrastructure bill." It's the BIPARTISAN infrastructure bill.
You want to critique the bill from a libertarian perspective? Fine. But it's not example of Dems going off the rails. If you're going to criticize Biden then criticize McConnell too...
But more importantly, Maher makes a lazy libertarian critique with bigoted assumptions of who leaves babies in the car by mistake, and no evidence that the regulation won't save any babies' lives...
...Maher begins the monologue marveling that he's become a "hero" on Fox News, while insisting "it's not me who's changed, it's the left"...
...Maher has always been libertarian-ish, so in that respect he hasn't.
But embracing Fox News while using Fox-style falsehoods to make cruel arguments? That may be new.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"I have requested that the Rules Committee explore ... a rule that advances both the budget RESOLUTION and the bipartisan infrastructure package" (emphasis mine)
The budget resolution is going to effectively determine the infrastructure toplines. And House isn't going to directly weigh in.
Point for Team Manchin.
@lindsemcpherson Why isn't the House putting forth their own resolutions? Because it would be too hard to reach consensus: "The panel's chairman, John Yarmuth, D-Ky., had hinted as much earlier in the week, noting the split within his party on the subject..."
Disunity weakens leverage...
The Senate is also not unified: "[Yarmuth] heard that Sanders is struggling to unify his committee around a proposal. Yarmuth said he was told that Sanders has only locked in support of nine of the 11 Democrats on [the budget cmte]"...
They tried to get around the 67-vote cloture threshold through a "nuclear option" maneuver (though it wasn't called that), blowing past cloture and overruling a point of order by simple majority...
Cato's (talking) filibusters were not designed to foster compromise. They were obstructionist tactics designed to stop wealth consolidation and authoritarianism.
He tried to slow Caesar's roll. When he failed, rather than live under Caesar's rule, he killed himself...