Bill Scher Profile picture
Jan 30 10 tweets 3 min read
Maher is doubling down on smearing Democrats and caricaturing them as loony leftists.

As I wrote in November, Maher's smears rely on falsehoods and misleading data points washingtonmonthly.com/2022/01/17/new…

But a couple things to note about this new hit job...
...Maher mocks Dems for welcoming Liz Cheney's criticism of Trump & the 1/6 riot

Just 3 months ago Maher delivered a heart-stopping monologue about Trump's "slow moving coup" where he praised Cheney for voting to impeach & lamented she was DOA in the GOP
Maher says "San Francisco has basically legalized shoplifting" (using a Oct. WSJ headline calling SF a "Shoplifter’s Paradise" as a visual-not a news headline, an opinion headline)

He left out that in Dec. SF's mayor announced a crime crackdown sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2021/12/15/may…
But here's where Maher just gets cruel...
Maher criticizes the "Biden infrastructure bill" for a new regulation requiring automakers to install in new cars "an alert system that goes off when you leave a baby in the back seat, which is something done only by crackheads and people who sadly, yes, do it on purpose"...
...he then complains that "every one of us will end up bearing the cost" even though "crackheads and people who do it on purpose" will do it anyway...
...First, it's not the "Biden infrastructure bill." It's the BIPARTISAN infrastructure bill.

You want to critique the bill from a libertarian perspective? Fine. But it's not example of Dems going off the rails. If you're going to criticize Biden then criticize McConnell too...
But more importantly, Maher makes a lazy libertarian critique with bigoted assumptions of who leaves babies in the car by mistake, and no evidence that the regulation won't save any babies' lives...
...Maher begins the monologue marveling that he's become a "hero" on Fox News, while insisting "it's not me who's changed, it's the left"...
...Maher has always been libertarian-ish, so in that respect he hasn't.

But embracing Fox News while using Fox-style falsehoods to make cruel arguments? That may be new.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bill Scher

Bill Scher Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @billscher

Sep 28, 2021
I've been telling y'all for a loooong time:

Pelosi has a history of walking back an initial progressive demand in pragmatic deference to the Senate.

And she signaled back in June that the initial linkage demand wasn't all that firm in the first place.

Here's my own recap...
...June 30 is when I first saw Pelosi define the linkage demand in looser terms than generally assumed...

...Pelosi's spox quickly pushed back on me in a quote tweet, but didn't actually debunk the point...
Read 14 tweets
Aug 15, 2021
"I have requested that the Rules Committee explore ... a rule that advances both the budget RESOLUTION and the bipartisan infrastructure package" (emphasis mine)

I told y'all 6 wks ago washingtonmonthly.com/2021/07/02/nan… Pelosi had in mind tying BIB to the resolution, not reconciliation...
...To refresh, on June 30 I flagged comments from Pelosi that gave her wiggle room to treat the resolution as sufficient for moving forward on BIB...
...Pelosi's spox quickly reacted to that tweet to say "No change in position here"...
Read 10 tweets
Jul 1, 2021
House punting the budget resolution to the Senate, reports @lindsemcpherson rollcall.com/2021/07/01/hou…

The budget resolution is going to effectively determine the infrastructure toplines. And House isn't going to directly weigh in.

Point for Team Manchin.
@lindsemcpherson Why isn't the House putting forth their own resolutions? Because it would be too hard to reach consensus: "The panel's chairman, John Yarmuth, D-Ky., had hinted as much earlier in the week, noting the split within his party on the subject..."

Disunity weakens leverage...
The Senate is also not unified: "[Yarmuth] heard that Sanders is struggling to unify his committee around a proposal. Yarmuth said he was told that Sanders has only locked in support of nine of the 11 Democrats on [the budget cmte]"...
Read 4 tweets
Jun 7, 2021
Some *major* historical context missing here

Byrd backed a compromise lowering cloture threshold to 60 for legislation while *keeping* it at 67 for rules changes

Byrd voted *against* a nuclear option attempt, which would be needed to lower the threshold to 55

Story time...
In February 1975, a bipartisan coalition led by Walter Mondale and James Pearson proposed lowering cloture to 60 across the board...

legislativeprocedure.com/blog/2019/3/8/…
They tried to get around the 67-vote cloture threshold through a "nuclear option" maneuver (though it wasn't called that), blowing past cloture and overruling a point of order by simple majority...
Read 29 tweets
Jun 7, 2021
The filibuster didn't start to foster bipartisanship, and it didn't start to perpetuate slavery or Jim Crow.

It started in Ancient Rome.

I explain here
realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/… but first a thread...
The person who deserves the most credit for inventing the filibuster is Cato the Younger, though the Romans called it "diem consumere" or to consume the day. (See @GoodmanRob1 & @jimmyasoni theatlantic.com/politics/archi… & politico.com/magazine/story… ) ...
Cato's (talking) filibusters were not designed to foster compromise. They were obstructionist tactics designed to stop wealth consolidation and authoritarianism.

He tried to slow Caesar's roll. When he failed, rather than live under Caesar's rule, he killed himself...
Read 18 tweets
May 11, 2021
Only 3 times since Reconstruction has the president's party gained House seats in the midterm.

But what's the common thread through those 3 times?

Crisis.

I wrote about it for @monthly washingtonmonthly.com/2021/05/10/dem…

But let's look at those 3 cases...
@monthly 1934: FDR begins to dig out the Great Depression with the New Deal. Net gain 9 seats.

1998: GOP launches impeachment inquiry during economic boom, boosting Clinton. Net gain 5 seats.

2002: Post 9/11 national security concerns boost Bush & GOP. Net gain 8 seats.

...
@monthly We have also one more case of the president's party losing less than 5 House seats.

1962: JFK's Democrats lose just 4 seats one month after the Cuban Missile Crisis.

...
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(