Trinh Profile picture
Aug 8, 2019 28 tweets 9 min read
Good morning🌞- another hot & hazy Thursday in 🇭🇰. After a Trump Tweet meets a weaker Yuan fix, Asian central banks didn't stand by & slashed🔪rates (RBNZ -50bps, RBI-35bps, BOT-25bps). Today, we got the BSP & expect a 25bps cut w/ a RRR cut to add extra liquidity.

#CurrencyWar
China July trade data is out & expectations of a sharper contraction of imports & exports weak.

Note this: China using the current account as a 1st line of defense is boosting its trade surplus via REDUCTION OF IMPORTS & that is bad news for traders 👇🏻.

Trade relationship between the US and China & the amounts w/ tariffs so far (45bn left to retaliate) & the amount not yet by the US on China (300bn left) 👇🏻. Notice the asymmetric relationship & also the last tranche mostly consumer & capital goods so Trump'll tread gently.
Another way to look at it & decomposed by manufacturing & non. Notice the massive manufacturing bias for China vs the US & also remember that manufacturing PMIs for China are still contracting. Escalated tensions likely to impact China July export figures in USD.
Because China has only 45bn left to retaliate (it knows this). And because its retaliation so far trails the US imposition of tariffs (110bn vs 250bn) & b/c the relationship is asymmetric, it is using the CURRENT ACCOUNT AS A LINE OF DEFENSE.

What does that mean? IMPORTS DOWN👇🏻
Why imports? Let's go back to this concept of a J-curve. The idea is that if you DEPRECIATE your currency (the yuan) then, depending on elasticity of demand, your weaker currency should help w/ pricing power.

But that theory ignores one fact - MOST GLOBAL TRADE INVOICED IN USD👇🏻
China's use of the RMB for trade invoicing PEAKED in Q1 2015, roughly ~65 of total merchandise trade. And do u remember what happened in August 2015? Yes, depreciation of RMB vs USD. Since then, usage of USD trade invoicing has risen to ~85-90%. This's important & pay attention.
Let's pretend u are a manufacturer in Guangdong. Ready?
Costs are: Fixed & variable & in CNY. May import some inputs for production but China uses mostly domestic goods except commodities (Trump's beef is that as China expands it export market globally, it imports less from RoW).
Price in USD to ur foreign customers.
Scenario1: CNY depreciates by 10% & tariffs go up say 10%.
Costs in CNY goes up by less b/c ur import content not so high but there is upward costs to fixed costs such as rent etc by 5%. Translates this into USD & costs of production cheaper
BUT, don't forget that u gain 10% in FX since last yr, but ur inputs in CNY don't stay constant & they go up say 5% so ur net is only up 5% & so in USD ur costs of production goes down by 5%. But tariffs are up 10% on the USD prices. To be competitive u have to discount in USD!
Tariffs are paid by importers (Americans & they are ur BIGGEST CUSTOMER 16-20% of market). But the importers VIEW UR PRODUCTS AS 10% more expensive vs. the others if prices same as last year in USD. Input costs lower but output has to be DISCOUNTED EVEN MORE & margin squeezed!
So the way Chinese manufacturers cope is by DISCOUNTING THEIR PRICES IN USD & passing on the SAVINGS to their American customers (this is why you don't see PCE in the US going higher). In the process, the margin they make on these products are LOWER despite savings in input costs
The DEPRECIATION OF THE CNY is helpful to lower INPUT COSTS & that means that if there weren't any tariffs, a Chinese exporter can get a boost if there aren't any tariff & may choose to either pass on the savings to be competitive or not but the savings less than FX depreciation.
This is why the Chinese government wants to expand usage of RMB in trade invoicing. But the fact is that MOST TRADE IS INVOICED IN USD. And that has implications in the PASS-THROUGH OF FX to the economy. Note that I haven't even touched trade financing, which is also in USD.
What is the macroeconomic implication of the dominance of the USD in trade-invoicing in China? The PASS-THROUGH OF FX IS THROUGH IMPORTS.

A 10% weaker CNY (not to mention a multitude of tax incentives passed recently to help w/ domestic market) means LESS IMPORT FROM WORLD.
You will see this today for the July figure & we already know that from the year-to-date figure of sharper contraction of imports (exports not doing great but domestic producers being helped by less competition).

Something else - the RMB REER is much lower than in 2015. So?
What is a REER? It is a summation of a trade-weighted FX (so say CNYUSD, CNYEUR, CNYKRW, etc) that is deflated by relative CPI. FX strategists/economists use this as a more comprehensive valuation of FX as USD just shows vs USD not other partners.

USD/CNY shows USD appreciating
Are you ready? This is the implication of China sheltering its economy through the current account (imports down): Asian exports are DOWN, especially key traders like South Korea.

Why are they down? Because South Korea depends on China for demand & that market is SHRINKING👇🏻
So the FX policy implication of this, and this is OLD NEWS, is that the Won can't appreciate against the YUAN (I wrote a report on this in 2016) & why you see the KRW DEPRECIATING MORE THAN THE CNY.

Why? Because it can't stand idly by & just watch its external market shrinking.
The mid-rate fix is 7.0039 today (lowest since 2008) & that means max it can weaken onshore is 7.143 (+2% & -2%). Okay, what do you think the trade figure will be? My guess is NOT PRETTY & watch the IMPORTS.

#CurrencyWar
The winner of Japan-Korea tensions, US-China tensions, weak domestic demand thanks to Moonomics & high household debt & low fiscal stimulus, weak global growth, China sheltering its domestic market using the current account as a 1st line of defense (fiscal + FX) is:

BOND🙇🏻‍♀️🥇💪🏻💪🏻
China July exports +3.3% vs expectations of -1% from -1.3% in June & IMPORTS CONTRACTED -5.6%YoY in USD.

Yes, trade surplus ballooning on weaker imports. With the CNY weaker, don't expect import demand to rise.
My guess is a lot of front-loading before the remainder of the tariffs go up (+300bn tariffs 1 September) & that is a key driver of the higher surplus with the US.
Front-loading will be even more intense in August, before the 1 September deadline of 10% of 300bn goods.
Details of China contraction of imports (-5.6%YoY) by destination:
USA -19.1% 🥶
Canada -23.6%🥶
Japan -13%🥶
South Korea -20.1%🥶
Singapore -2.9%🥶
EU -3.3%🥶
UK -22.4%🥶
Germany -7.5%🥶

Hong Kong up +19.9%
Details of China EXPANSION of exports (+3.3%YoY):
USA -6.5% (down but not as much as imports by China of American products)
Canada +6.5% (note that Chinese demand of Canadian is DOWN)
Japan -4.1%
South Korea +9.3%
Taiwan +19.9%
Singapore +11.6%
EU+6.5%
UK +9.1%
Germany +5.8%
Putting this together:
a) China exports to the USA contracts but by less than US exports to China as Chinese exporters likely discounted products (thanks to a weaker CNY) to offset tariffs
b) China exports to RoW rise as a weaker CNY helps w/ input costs
c) China IMPORTS CONTRACT
The big story of the year is:

China using the current account as a first line of defense & that story is especially more salient as the CNY weakness quickens. This has global implication b/c the stabilization of China comes at a great costs to exporters (less Chinese demand)👆🏻

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Trinh

Trinh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Trinhnomics

Feb 15
I watched the Edge of War the other day & it's about Chamberlain appeasement to Hitler in Munich. He thought that appeasing Hitler's thirst to invade stops with giving him the Sudenteland from his ally Czechoslovakia would end in peace.

He gave a speech afterwards about peace.
Of course you know what happens next, Hitler ambition wasn't just the Sudenteland. He was so happy with Chamberlain's wishful approach to geopolitics and proceeded to attack its neighbors. It took the invasion of Poland for war to be declared by the UK on 3 September 1939.
Read 4 tweets
Feb 10
Good morning! Shall we discuss something a bit more structural, although this is a cyclical theme in 2022 across Asia, from China to India and Southeast Asia. Let's talk about #infrastructure , which is the theme of the hour & the next decade🛣️🌉🚆📶⚡️

@natixis @NatixisResearch
Today, infrastructure stocks are soaring in China as hope of government policy leaning towards this sector to shore up domestic demand in sagging growth momentum.

In India, infrastructure has been a big theme & even more so after the expanded budget that prioritizes it ⏫📈.
Why is infrastructure the theme of the hour and the next 2 decades? Simply put: infrastructure is essential for the improvement of the quality of life, production of goods, services and to raise productivity of labor.

Demand for infrastructure is high & will sky rocket.
Read 36 tweets
Feb 7
Good morning! Hope you have a great Lunar New Year and happy Tet! I did even if it was uneventful. First year as a mom and giving out lots of li xi. Now, back to our regular programming of daily reminder of brent 92.8/barrel and markets completely priced out negative rates in EUR
Let me put this another way, Brent crude is +19.35% so far this year and other commodities like palm oil is up too.

I hope u listened when I said you should fear inflation more than Omicron. The Scandinavians have decided that pandemic is over.

Anyway, let's stay w/ inflation.
Let's look at global rates - what do you see? Or shall I say it differently, what don't you see?

NEGATIVE EUROPEAN RATES, esp BUND.

Ok, why? Inflation! I told you, central banks DO NOT PROMISE YOU A ROSE GARDEN. Christine changed her tune when CPI hit 5.1%.

So did JPO at 7%
Read 10 tweets
Jan 30
Highly recommend this story for everyone to read. First, it is beautifully written & honest, especially the part about the fear of not being chosen during HS for class assignments. Second, it gives us insight on the little things we need to do to enable mobility for the disabled.
As a mother, I wheel my baby around the city a lot. He can’t walk yet & too heavy to carry around. And when I stroll him around, I notice that Hong Kong is not wheel-chair/stroller friendly at all. Pavements don’t have a natural curve to enable u to go straight & so u can’t move
I actually haven’t seen any wheel chair around Hong Kong unless it is being pushed by someone & just on a few roads where this is possible.

Accessibility is limited & can’t tell u how excited I get when I see a ramp.

But my angst is a sliver of what disabled people face.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 27
Good morning! Shall we talk about US Q4 GDP? It was gangbuster at 5.5% YoY (we use this to compare to Asian countries) or this is what Q4 2021 vs Q4 2020. Nominal GDP grew 11.7%YoY and so US nominal GDP expanded 10.2% in 2021.

Fed is still doing QE & rates are close to zero.👈
I compare the quarterly %YoY chart here of the US nominal, US real and China real GDP. Note that as China decelerates towards 4% in Q4, US GDP accelerated to 5.5%.

Last year, the US grew 5.7% in 2021 vs 2020 (which fell -3.4% vs 2019) so a lot of it is making up for lost time.
US nominal GDP was USD22.99trn or USD23trn (good number to remember so when people say this is X% of GDP). And so it added 2.1trn or 10% in 2021 to total 23trn by end of the year.

Now what does that say about 2022? If consensus is right, going to be about 25trn by end of this yr
Read 5 tweets
Jan 27
This report by @business is just great! Congress ownership of tech makes tech regulations awkward! Guess who owns a ton of tech? @SpeakerPelosi

And will she regulate? So far, she's not keen to! She doesn't want to regulate tech. We wonder why...

>100 million dollars invested🤗
Asked by reporters whether she should regulate tech, she responded, "We are a free-market economy." And she hated the idea.

I wonder why? >100 million dollars at stake for her
Congressional trading persists!!! Yes, persists! This is a person that has been around in government since the 1980s and is seeking re-election at 81 years old whose family own >100 million dollars in tech.

Do we have a conflict of interest here? Do we? Hmm
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(