Big_Orrin Profile picture
Sep 15, 2019 8 tweets 2 min read
1. biggest problem with releasing from US SPR is the crude is in the wrong place for refineries in the short term.

First, It will take 2 weeks for the first SPR crude to hit the market after Trump permitted its release.

#OOTT
2. The second: most similar crude from other producers will already have been allocated making it difficult to cover any short fall in Saudi crude until the November programs.
3. Third Literally if you look at a map Saudi Arabia is right in the centre of oil logistics. The US is not. it is at the extreme. For a importing country it is not a big problem but as a producer it is a problem being at the extreme.
4. The US is expecting to release up to 4.4mbpd from the SPR but the US only imports about 400kbpd from Saudi and 1mbpd from other OPeC producers. That means other regions will be hit by a 50% drop in Saudi exports if they continue for long.
5. Asia will be the big loser. For the US to get its crude to Asia to fill the loss, it will take an extra month of sailing time than from Saudi. That means that trump permitting release of crude today reaches Asia in about 10 weeks, 6 weeks later than Saudi crude produced today
6. Therefore, Asian refiners won’t see any benefit in the short term from the US release. Increase in Oil prices for a refiner are only a cash flow and credit line problem rather than a profit problem as refinery margins typically remain.
7. The only other oil available is probably Urals due to refinery maintenance but that has the same freight problems as US crude in the short term. So the only crude to cover if Saudi exports fall is 1mb of ME spare capacity. India and China will need to draw down inventories
8. Last question will be with reduced Saudi production, will they keep their own Saudi refineries running at full blast?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Big_Orrin

Big_Orrin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Big_Orrin

Feb 14
1. Some thoughts on missing barrels while watching the Super Bowl.

The only accurate way to look at what is being consumed in the oil market is mass. Not volume.

To try and balance volume takes way too many assumptions to be accurate
2. Why? Because mass cannot be created or destroyed therefore it will always balance.

Volume on the other hand is affected by pressure, temperature, composition, refinery configuration etc. and is effectively impossible to balance especially after processed in a refinery.
3. To try and standardize a barrel of crude oil or products to minimize the effect of volume variance a standardized temperature and pressure is used.

But that leaves composition that prevents standardization.
Read 9 tweets
Jan 28
1. A rant about the energy transition

The way the energy transition is happening it will fail because it fails to understand what is important to most people and what is not. Therefore, is likely to lose significant support with out a recalibration.
2. There are many polls that show emissions are important to people. But they are always a one off question. They are never asked where emissions fall within a person’s list of priorities. It is now assumed that emissions are every persons priority. They are not.
3. Actions of people show emissions are not high on their list of priorities. When demand increases sufficiently and coal fired plants enter operation, they don’t reduce their demand to stop the coal emissions. They continue living their life expecting availability of energy.
Read 10 tweets
Dec 27, 2021
1. If I was physical trader with long term gas contract with Russia. I would not buy extra. Why?

A. Extra flow would reduce value of inventories and profit selling it.
B. Buying extra would provide little profitable margin on the extra volume and potentially losing money
2. As soon as more flow is seen from Russia if I have bought extra then price falls in this volatile market. Thus reducing the value of my cheap inventories and cheap contracted volumes that I am selling on at market value.
3. If I bought extra it would be at spot price and I would sell at spot price. This would mean little margin and it could mean I lose if the price falls below what I pay. Why take the risk?
Read 9 tweets
Nov 25, 2021
1. Seen a lot of paper traders telling Physical traders what they should do with regard to the SPR release and how much money they could make. $5/bbl seems to be the consensus level. On 1mb that is a cool $5m profit.

But sadly reality is not like paper trading.
2. Paper traders suggest you sell the prompt month you where you receive the crude oil and then buy back the month you need to return the crude oil to the SPR. Simple!!!!!!!

Not quite.
3. Lets take the costs on the physical transaction part.

First the easy bit. the cost charged by the SPR

For one year it is 3.9% to be repaid in extra barrels.

So 1mb received requires payment of 1,039,000bbls

Cost: $300k
Read 18 tweets
Nov 23, 2021
1. Thread

Now seen what Biden is doing, I have been hearing it is not enough, it is worse than expected, etc. But putting potentially 50 million prompt barrels in market is not nothing. It is 1/9th of total US commercial crude inventories and 3 days of US refinery throughput
2. It is 50 WAF cargoes, or 83 North Sea cargoes. In WAF terms that is equivalent to 1.5 Angolan programs and 1 Nigerian. These two programs are already finding it difficult to sell.

So to stuff that amount into a market in as little as 15 days is huge.
3. Now the argument that I have seen most this last week is about OPEC+ retaliation as if it was some level of equivalence. That by suspending their increases OPEC+ would put it to Biden. So let’s do the numbers.
Read 9 tweets
Oct 23, 2021
1. In Europe data showed that 19% of new cars are of Electric in nature. What is interesting is how that number is occurring.

In Spain, EV prices are not falling even with subsidies. What is happening is gasoline and diesel car prices are going up.
2. A Volkswagen Golf could be found for around €18k brand new before COVID, now lowers price is €23k. Dacia Sandero was €7k now is €8k.

It is happening across the board that new gasoline/diesel prices have risen while EV prices have remained static.
3. So what we are seeing is lower income people being forced out the new car market while those on higher incomes benefit from subsidies. So emissions are not going down, because the market is limited on who can pay the price for an EV.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(