See, the number they are using to mislead parents is wrong - blatantly wrong. It comes from a grant request. To come to that number the agency took every student and social worker in schools. Except there is one huge problem with that strategy...
Some states don’t even have school social workers. Take Nevada - it isn’t even a licensed profession. That isn’t a national school average - that’s just lazy statistics.
Now it is one thing if you didn’t know this - but CPS literally asked me. As a follow up to a call which seemed to be an attempt to discredit the association’s recommend standard Sendhil Revuluri, Vice President of CBOE specifically asked me about this grant number.
I told her what I felt was wrong with it and then gave her actual numbers from the National Center for Education Statistics (located within the US Dept. of Ed.) nces.ed.gov/surveys/ntps/t…
In it you can see Public schools in a city with at least one social worker have a ratio of 1:650 not even remotely what the mayor is pushing out in that propaganda piece.
This is all about trust. The @ChicagosMayor wants parents to trust her while she deliberately attempts to mislead them. This is why @CTULocal1 needs to fight.
But that isn’t all that is wrong with that report - here is a breakdown just on the social work staffing sections:
1.) “However, social workers, nurses, counselors, and other similar positions are hard to hire.” = FALSE
Illinois is graduating 2k Swkers a year. It takes 1 year to graduate an MSW with advanced standing - 2 without. If you put commitments in writing they will choose the school specialty. You are only adding 200 over 5 years. That can be done easily,
2.) “Second, setting strict limits in the contract for the number of support professionals the district must keep on staff limits our schools’ ability to best support their student population” = False
That is only true if you fundamentally believe these baselines aren’t needed. What school in Chicago doesn’t need a nurse, a social worker and a librarian? Or better question - why are you arguing some kids shouldn’t get medical care?
2b.) “Schools in higher need neighborhoods may need multiple social workers and other support staff while other schools may need less.” = False.
There is no school in Chicago that needs less than a part-time social worker they have now. None. And if you need more than one - do that.
3.)Third, opening hundreds of new nursing, social worker, librarian, and other positions all over the city in a short time period ...could have negative unintended consequences. “ = What in the actual heck? I mean I guess?
You can’t build equitable schools in this city if you aren’t willing to invest quickly in tearing down what has been a racist and inequitable system. Kids trapped in deliberately underfunded schools should not have to wait because you are afraid of unintended consequences.
What you are doing instead is acknowledging disparities, doing nothing and therefore creating intended consequences. Consequences that will result in students not getting the necessary health care they should get because of inaction.
This whole thing is morally repulsive. Do better.
* Correction: 1:680 (same premise.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This was a bill I was lucky to work on for over two years. Our first stake holders meeting was the bill sponsors, NASWIL, Equip for Equality and giant table of folks who were none to please to have to discuss this issue and were determined to make sure a bill never passed. #Twill
There is some really great things in this bill, even if it doesn’t move as fast as some of us wanted. Prone restraint is virtually banned for all kids, seclusion can only be used as a last result, requires a ton of reporting and pushes a phase out.
There is also some other things in there that haven’t gotten a lot of press like a ban on these schools chemically restraining kids or denying them food, bathroom breaks and water. Things that were happening and were legal.
So the Chicago Board of Education, when given an opportunity to remove trauma inducing SROs from their schools - instead punted. It wasn’t unexpected, just disappointing after expirencing the work Chicago youth did.
The largest media coverage was around their marches, protests outside @chicagosmayor and even the BOE Chair’s home. However, the youth did some amazing work lobbying behind the scenes as well.
They researched fact based arguments rooted in academic research, they proposed alternatives to policing, they organized Zoom meetings with BOE members and worked to persuade a reluctant board to coming 1 (almost there) vote away.
People are going to need an FAQ for the FAQ but there is so much in the @ChicagoEthicsBd opinions that are interesting and few questions I now have. chicago.gov/content/dam/ci…
The social media ones stand out, public messages on Social Media (even directed at elected officials) = not lobbying. Private messages could be. It appears as if public is considered indirect and therefore permissible.
It would appear, but not directly stated that media interviews and quotes would also apply. Curious when the elected official engages said social media post, as some have tended to do or even sends you DMs complaining about your post -- when does their action change your status.
If you missed this press conference, I encourage you to find it on the internet...it was something. Let’s discuss.
I think it is safe to say that @SharkeyCTU1 isn’t going to get invited to @chicagosmayor house anytime soon for her preferred craft beer. And honestly, you kind of expect a level of dislike and exhaustion in both individuals at this point.
Tonight though...whew. When asked by a reporter how students are going to catch up for the lost instructional time. The Mayor’s response was along the lines of harm was already done and she isn’t rescheduling days. Which is weird...and then you realize she is talking about kids
If you were to tell me a year ago, I would be congratulating a billionaire Governor on his successes and protesting the mayor who replaced Rahm - I would have thought you were crazy. Yet here we are.
The difference? One set out to show his campaign promises were commitments the other set out to show hers were mere suggestions.
This (what appears now inevitable) strike boils down to a union fighting to put in writing a Mayor’s campaign promises from just 7 months ago.
When @politico_il gets it wrong - you have to hand it to them - they get it REALLY wrong. Unfortunately not fact checking the talking points from the Mayor’s office misleads the public too. (Sigh) let’s dive in: #Twill
For starters, no @politico_il CPS has not agreed to yet another 200 social workers as your post implies.
In fact if you read the new CPS website you can clearly see the words “earlier this summer” when describing the social work offer. Why would you say there is a new offer - offering 200 more @politico_il ?