The US-UK trade negotiations are looking just as bad as you might expect, given the disparity of negotiating strength. The media have focused on the NHS, but @openDemocracy here analyse some of the other aspects:
Bans on opening source code and examining algorithms are plain attacks on attempts to make digital systems accountable, non-discriminatory and fair to *actual people*.
Current trade negotiations are looking at banning access to source code and algorithms.
In other words: when a company decides you can't have a job, insurance, or denies an ethnic minority access to a product, we're not allowed to know why.
They will want lots of detail to hammer DRM into law, with severe penalties for breaking it, and so on.
That's bad if you want to back up content, or if DRM security issues mean your device is putting you at risk.
@openDemocracy@reddit They also want trade secrets reinforced. This is really dubious.
It may sound reasonable but it's a way to keep companies' strange practices well out of scrutiny. See @Senficon's blog on the problems with trade secret protections here: juliareda.eu/2015/06/trade-…
@openDemocracy@reddit@Senficon The UK affirmed its support for copyright filtering and charges on use of newspaper previews on social media from links (the #linktax).
Just in case you were worried that we'd abandon every idea that's come from the EU, no we'll definitely keep the bad ones.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh