A short thread debunking the atheist lies about Muhammad's ﷺ marriage to Aisha and so called "child marriages".

First this is just to show a biological scientific reality, I'm sure as you all know there is no morality without religion.

So we can dismiss all moral claims.
First (speaking to Westerners) there is a huge difference betrothing and marriage. Betrothing means "you will get married in the future"

Aisha was betrothed to Muhammad ﷺ at age 6, and gt married after she hit puberty at age 9

sunnah.com/nasai/26/60
As Dr. Jonathan AC Brown says many Westerners fail to grasp the difference between contracting a marriage (betroth/engagement) and consummating it (making it official)

Nor do they understand the concept of "puberty"

Source: Misquoting Muhammad (2014) Dr. Jonathan A.C. Brown PhD
Now as for her hitting puberty at 9, it's common for people in hotter climates to hit puberty at earlier ages.

Source: Muhammad at Mecca (1953) Dr. William Montgomery Watt PhD
In fact scientifically the age of puberty (physical maturity) was historically lower than it was post-industrial revolution, as well as psychosocial maturity (mental maturity)

This is just a scientific fact, if you don't like it argue with biology

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
This is Grays Anatomy, a standard medical book, every single med student has to buy when you enter med school.

As we can see after puberty, one becomes biologically sexually active

Source: Gray's Anatomy 41st Edition, Section 2, Page 214
So you might be wondering "b-but muh feels"

Neil Postman explains, that the modern concept of "childhood" is a recent social construct that did not exist before the 20th century.

Source: "The Disappearance of Childhood" (1982) Dr. Neil Postman, PhD
Before the 20th century, children would see themselves as equal to adults, were much more mature, & took on much more responsibilities.

They still do this in Japan, where children are trusted to goto school, cross highways, & use the trains by themselves

That's just how easy it is to refute these arguments, they aren't based on any scientific facts and are just "muh feelings don't like that" (aka secular liberal morality, which as we already know is false and illogical)

And that's it, the argument is over, I win, just like that.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived)

Dr. Khalid PhD 🇧🇳☪️ (Archived) Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TenMillionIQ

Jan 1, 2021
I noticed an interesting flaw with atheism

Atheism is against brother-sister incest if it results in a baby (due to genetic illnesses/defects)

However atheism is for brother-sister incest if they use a condom/birth control to not have a baby

theguardian.com/world/2007/feb…

1/5
Jürgen Kunze, professor of human genetics says:

"When siblings have a child together, there is only a 50% chance that it will be healthy when it is born"

So would atheism support brother-sister incest if it could be proven their child was in the 50% of healthy babies?

2/5
Or going even further,

a) if they couple kept getting abortions until they got a healthy baby

b) if in the future technology existed to remove all genetic illnesses from incest babies

Would atheism then support incest in these cases?

3/5
Read 5 tweets
Dec 6, 2020
<thread 🧵>

A thread debunking the feminist myth that what you wear doesn't matter, and clothing doesn't prevent sexual harassments. (Proven with scientific studies on the topic)

Short summary: Yes the hijab does prevent sexual harassments and attracts less male attention ImageImage
Scientific studies have shown women are aware of the sexual signals their clothing sends:

1- Women who wore immodest clothing did so in order to flirt with strangers.

2- Women who wore sexual clothing did so in order to have sex with strangers.

tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108… ImageImageImage
More scientific studies confirm these findings, and have also shown women who wear immodest or sexual clothing self-objectify themselves, which cause anxiety, unhappiness, body-dissatisfaction, and body shame.

link.springer.com/article/10.118… ImageImageImage
Read 25 tweets
Oct 21, 2020
<thread 🧵>

Why atheists have sex with dogs - (explained from the point of view of atheism as to accurately represent atheist voices)

A thread exposing atheism, & why normal people will never accept atheism (proven with scientific papers)
You might have seen this video of a PhD atheist philosopher promoting bestiality as a human right

It's not surprising, many sexual orientations were persecuted a decade ago, & this is the next new sexual orientation that secular atheism wants to liberate

Bestiality in atheism goes back to the French Revolution.

Back then secular atheists used to commit public acts of bestiality to protest against religion

Source: Miletski, H., 2005. A history of bestiality. Anthrozoos-Journal of the International Society for Anthrozoology
Read 10 tweets
Oct 14, 2020
<thread 🧵>

The Incoherence of atheism: Part 1: How atheism Contradicts Itself

A series of threads on how atheism in of itself does not make logical sense, and can only be explained as irrational.
atheists deny religion solely on their misotheistic feelings, yet do not deny other forms of ideologies.

Religion after all is just another kind of ideology, no different than political ideologies (which many atheist basically worship as their neo-god)
For example lets compare religion to liberalism:

In religion there is "blasphemy", "heresy"

In liberalism/atheism/secularism they have "hate speech", "home/trains-phobia", "TERF" etc...

Just another noun to describe the same thing: "anything that offends"
Read 13 tweets
Sep 16, 2020
<thread 🧵>

Thread on how atheism causes higher crime rates.
Numerous scientific evidence has shown that atheists commit more crimes and have higher per-capita crime rates.

A meta-analysis shows that atheism increases crime rates in children and young adults.

It's also scientifically proven a lack of religion results in higher rates of drug abuse.

And higher religiosity results in lower rates of drug abuse.

Read 10 tweets
Aug 14, 2020
<small thread 🧵>

A short explanation of this paper (so any of you using it don't misinterpret it and make a mistake) :

1st - The green (puberty) and pink (psycho-social maturity) bars are NOT intrinsically matched to each other.

They don't have to match.
2nd - basically if everyone had unlimited food & no diseases (i.e no evolutionary pressure) then everyone would hit puberty at 9 (green bar)

Age of puberty was higher in places like medieval Europe because they had less food, thus it was a disadvantage to have kids at 9
2nd cont. - today this is no longer the case due to the Industrial Revolution and thus increased food production (why the green bar is lower today)

Nor was this the case at more temperate latitudes which had better food production (more sunlight = faster food production)
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(