"When siblings have a child together, there is only a 50% chance that it will be healthy when it is born"
So would atheism support brother-sister incest if it could be proven their child was in the 50% of healthy babies?
2/5
Or going even further,
a) if they couple kept getting abortions until they got a healthy baby
b) if in the future technology existed to remove all genetic illnesses from incest babies
Would atheism then support incest in these cases?
3/5
Also (b) suggests that even though according to atheism, having incest children is wrong now, it won't always be wrong, and will become okay in the future as medical technology advances and is able to cure these things
4/5
In short:
Advances in technology will allow people to indulge in whatever desire they want without any consequences
Technology will negate any harmful effects of any action, thus atheism must eventually logically permit everything
Just goes to show how flawed atheism is
5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread debunking the feminist myth that what you wear doesn't matter, and clothing doesn't prevent sexual harassments. (Proven with scientific studies on the topic)
Short summary: Yes the hijab does prevent sexual harassments and attracts less male attention
Scientific studies have shown women are aware of the sexual signals their clothing sends:
1- Women who wore immodest clothing did so in order to flirt with strangers.
2- Women who wore sexual clothing did so in order to have sex with strangers.
More scientific studies confirm these findings, and have also shown women who wear immodest or sexual clothing self-objectify themselves, which cause anxiety, unhappiness, body-dissatisfaction, and body shame.
Why atheists have sex with dogs - (explained from the point of view of atheism as to accurately represent atheist voices)
A thread exposing atheism, & why normal people will never accept atheism (proven with scientific papers)
You might have seen this video of a PhD atheist philosopher promoting bestiality as a human right
It's not surprising, many sexual orientations were persecuted a decade ago, & this is the next new sexual orientation that secular atheism wants to liberate
The first thing that you should know is that this book is not published by any actual academic publishers, e.g OUP, Routledge, Palgrave Macmillan, Brill, Sage etc...
But instead Dario decided to go with a organization on the same tier as Alex Jones' Infowars.
(Pearce, pg 33)
DFM likes to talk a lot about "primary sources"
Since he cannot read the primary sources, he cites secondary sources & translations.
Even going as far to ignore sources that disprove him, and then lie that he "provided his reader all the known evidence"