#AcademicTwitter: I see overwhelming discussion on the downsides of academia. I worry what this does to the hope & inspiration of grad students with ambitions to go into academia. Given that I think #academia is the best job ever, my thoughts on life as an academic.
A thread 👇🏽
(1/11) Autonomy: As an academic (even without tenure), I feel like I have so much autonomy to pursue the scientific ideas that I find to be important. For someone who is internally motivated and feels passionate about certain areas of research, this is a priceless benefit.
(2/11) Never Ending Knowledge Gains: Every single day I go to work and learn new things. Every. Single. Day. The intellectual stimulation that I receive from my colleagues is such a gift. They push me and my science to be better. And I am so thankful.
(3/11) Mentoring: I have benefited significantly from exceptional mentoring. I can never pay that back, but I get the chance to pay it forward every day. Mentoring the exceptional students in my lab and the committees I sit on gives me a deep sense of joy and pride.
(4/11) Teaching: The students in my courses are brilliant. Full Stop. Their insights and discussion points never cease to amaze me, and I feel like I learn just as much from them, if not more, than they learn from me.
(5/11) Flexibility: Academia provides significantly more scheduling flexibility than most other professions. We are a milestone-based profession (grants, papers, books). As a result, beside time you are in class, people tend to care very little about where and when you work.
(6/11) Flexibility cont.: Personally, I work best in the morning so I am often up writing at 4am. If I was tied to a 9am-5pm schedule, I would be a lot less productive. Also, as a mom of two, this allows me to work around my children’s schedules, which is invaluable to me.
(7/11) Impact: We are often sought after for our expertise. This allows us to influence policy and changes in communities, clinical settings, governmental agencies, & industry, thereby increasing the impact of our work significantly more than if we disseminated our work alone.
(8/11) Colleagues: I get to work with some of the smartest, noble, and kind people in the world. You don't go into academia to become rich and could make a lot more money in other industries. Academics have a passion for their work and are here because they want to change the🌎.
(9/11) Travel: Conferences, meetings, and guest speaker opportunities take you all over the country and the world. I’ve been able to see so many places that I would not have otherwise seen. New cultures, new people, and new places are a privilege to be exposed to.
(10/11) Personal growth: There is a lot of rejection in academia. This invites personal growth, introspection, and humility. I am a better person for all of the experiences and teachable moments I have had as an academic.
(11/11) Overall, I feel that being an academic is such a privileged position. I am grateful for the opportunity to conduct research, teach, mentor, and serve every day. These may not reflect everyone’s experiences in academia, but they reflect mine.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🗣️New pub:
We used machine learning & natural language processing to analyze the words of >6K people experiencing long-term weight-loss maintenance who answered open-ended questions about weight-loss triggers, current motivations, strategies, & experiences. A thread of findings:
Methods: We recruited 6,139 @ww_us members who had lost ≥9.1-kg loss with weight-loss maintenance for ≥1yr into the WW Success Registry and asked six open-ended questions about their weight loss experience. On average, members maintained a weight loss of 54 pounds for 3.4 yr.
74% of @ww Success Registry Members routinely track their weight and 82% find inspiration in non-scale victories. Though weight was something they were conscious of, it was far from the only thing that matters.
Questions asked are in the table below.
#AcademicTwitter: I used to be a horrible scientific writer. I was paralyzed by writing anxiety & it took me FOREVER to write papers. Last year I published 14 scientific articles (8 first, 2 second, 2 senior-author) & 2 book chapters.
A thread⬇️on how I became more productive:
1. Figure out when you write best & block out that time on your calendar.
I write best in the morning. Unless unavoidable, I do not take meetings in the morning. Mornings are my time to read, write, & think. I write every single day, Monday-Friday. Even if just 30 minutes.
Every Friday, I do a brain dump of what tasks I need to complete for the following week. I block off my calendar with writing times & what I will focus on during those times (e.g., 8-10am is specific aims). I try to be realistic about what I can accomplish during a given time.
New pub alert: our qualitative paper identifying perceived barriers & facilitators to a healthy lifestyle & weight loss among a diverse group of teens with overweight & #obesity has been published.
We conducted 10 focus groups with teens medically classified as having overweight or obesity (OW/OB).
Demographics:
41 teens
68% female
53.5% identify as Black, African American, Hispanic/LatinX, multiple races
Socioeconomically Diverse
All w BMI over 85th percentile for sex/age
We found that teen girls and teen boys described their lived experience with overweight/obesity (OW/OB) differently.
Girls shared that healthcare providers, family, & friends discussed weight w them & they felt weight loss was needed to meet societal and/or medical standards.
As a result of #COVID19, academics are working from home, often while simultaneously caring for their children. As clinicians & scientists, @nataliexdean@DrDianaMW & I worry this will lead to a secondary epidemic of lost early career scientists, esp women w children. A thread👇🏾
We published just this paper highlighting the vulnerability early career scientists may face as a result of #COVID19, particularly women w children. We identified strategies academic institutions could implement to attenuate loss of early career faculty: atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.151…
Prime reproductive years often overlap with early stage of scientific careers. Even before #COVID19, 43% of women (23% men) left full-time STEM employment after having their 1st child, loss rates that are significantly higher than faculty w/out children. pnas.org/content/116/10…
Today, I finished my 4th @NIH study section (though first one via Zoom). I have learned so much through these experiences on what reviewers want, and more importantly, what they don’t want to see in grant applications.
Justify, justify, justify. Provide rationale for why you choose the study design that you did. Even if the reviewers don’t necessarily agree with the route you chose, they are less likely to ding you for it if you provide a scientific rationale for *why* you choose it.
Be upfront about the limitations of your study design. There is no such thing as the perfect study. Recognize the limitations of the design you selected, identify potential problems that may arise, and be proactive in a section specifically addressing them.
(1/16): Institutional interventions can increase awareness of and commitment to establishing gender equity in hiring.
(2/16): Between 1961 and 2008, women who received paid leave had a greater odds of returning to work within 3–5 months after the birth of their first child, compared with women who did not receive or use paid leave.