If political dialogue is to identify and redress existing forms of injustice, participants in the dialogue must be able to appeal to the concept of objectivity in order to exchange claims, attitudes, and background beliefs which distort or conceal various forms of injustice. 
Objectivity was invented in an age of information scarcity, its relevance in an age of information abundance is now being questioned. Does an OBJECTIVE voice hold the same value today as it did a century ago? Do people prefer raw senseless partisanship void of truth to balance?
Although often used interchangeably, they mean different things. Impartiality relates to absence of bias and objectivity to identifying facts and evidence. In essence, Impartiality and OBJECTIVITY have been what separate true Information from Propaganda, Entertainment, or Fiction
Someone once said: The challenge for many of us is that when we are under a lot of pressure, we tend to be less objective. Under stress, most of us draw solely on our past experiences, old assumptions & biases, which cloud our ability to see things clearly & make sound judgments.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
