Let's put the so-called "abortion bodily rights argument" to shame.
You've probably heard the saying, "even if the unborn are human beings, they dont have the right to be there without consent." Here is why that is false.
Thread:
#ProLife #ProLifeGeneration #prochoice
A child does not need a parent's consent to have the right to a parent's care. You create human life, you are responsible for human life. Even if you didn't deliberately create it, you're responsible for children when you are the only means of support or care.
If somebody drops a baby in your house and your response is "out of my house, I don't consent to you being there" and you throw the baby away in a blinding snowstorm, you would be liable to criminal prosecution on numerous levels.
The law does not deprive you of responsibility to a child EVEN IF you did not consent to that responsibility. Children are vulnerable beings who depend on the good will of others, even strangers, to be able to have their lives and dignity respected. Pregnancy is no different.
You don't get to remove your own child because you dont "consent" to responsibility. Responsibility is not something you consent to AFTER you create it. If I break a window playing baseball, I don't get to renege on responsibility because I never consented to break the window.
The fact is, I broke it, hence it's my responsibility. Same with pregnancy.
You didn't consent to it, but pregnant?
In a position where you owe a duty of care?
Got a baby to take care of?
That responsibility is inherent.
The unborn don't need permission. They, like any young child, have every right to be nurtured and protected, and it's a parents PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY to make sure no harm comes to the child.
Pro-choice advocates lack such natural affection.