This tweet has invited an influx of people hinting that the answer is lawlessness and violence.
Think about it.
Trump does something outrageous, and swarms of people on Twitter hint that we need to break the law to fight against Trump.
Who does that benefit?
Think about it.
Trump does something outrageous, and swarms of people on Twitter hint that we need to break the law to fight against Trump.
Who does that benefit?
I should let you all know that Twitter Mom becomes very cross when my followers hint that lawlessness, violence, anarchy, or war are the answer.
(I only get annoyed when followers do this. If someone isn't following me, they're clearly just parachuting in to cause damage.)
(I only get annoyed when followers do this. If someone isn't following me, they're clearly just parachuting in to cause damage.)
Precisely.
The worst thing we can do is escalate the situation. As Prof. Steven Levitsky (author of How Democracies Die ) says, "escalation rarely ends well."
To offer the voters a choice, one side has to stand for rationality, reason, and law.
The worst thing we can do is escalate the situation. As Prof. Steven Levitsky (author of How Democracies Die ) says, "escalation rarely ends well."
To offer the voters a choice, one side has to stand for rationality, reason, and law.
