My Authors
Read all threads
I have been fascinated by the analogies in the use of scenarios for #COVID19 policies & climate policies. So many overlapping issues, but #COVID19 is on warp speed while climate takes decades.

@hollyjeanbuck has a post discussing some of the issues

1/

strelkamag.com/en/article/the…
"A curve ... can provide a frame, an instruction set, a kind of prescription for what governance is needed. Policy is then set out in order to bring reality into conformance with the curve."

[Sounds very familiar]

2/
"... the failures of governance by curve in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic must not repeat in the case of climate crisis mitigation"

A few examples follow.

3/
"It is ... hard to explain concepts like “net-zero” or “negative emissions” without reference to this curve. ... “Negative emissions” are spoken of in reference to conceptual figures like these."

[CO₂ removal come to life, even if it remains rather conceptual at scale]

4/
"The curve is an average of IAM runs, which have included negative emissions technologies as part of how to curb warming to 2°C. ... Many possible worlds are implied there, collapsed into one."

[Though, they are all somewhat similar in form]

5/
"In this [#SR15] depiction, you get to pick your curve. Many people like P1. P1 is a version where the world keeps warming to 1.5°C without CCS. However, there are a few challenges with it..."

6/
"In part because that decarbonization curve is so hard to deliver ... the so-called “peak shaving” diagram of a [solar geoengineering appeared] ... it can “buy time” for decarbonization, & shave the peak off of the climate impacts..."

7/
"the plot diagram for much of Western literature: the rising action-climax-falling action curve, a basic form that has been observed since Aristotle’s Poetics"

[a curve I had not seen...]

8/
"Flatten the curve"

"Trying to make reality conform to the curve is an understandable narrative drive, but an incredibly simplistic way to govern complex systems."

Unfortunately, it is more complex...

9/
"In the case of the 2°C scenario, we might miss the effort involved—technical, economic, social—in building the massive carbon removal infrastructure."

10/
"In the case of peak-shaving stratospheric aerosol injections, we might miss the work involved with both carbon removal and mitigation, and the risk of failing to follow through with them."

11/
"And in the case of COVID-19, we might miss the collapse of a global economy—a complex system which is entangled with culture, health, and security, and not really just about an abstract “economy” at all."

12/
As Neil Ferguson (lead author of the Imperial College report) said “we don’t have a clear exit strategy... we’re going to have to suppress this virus—frankly indefinitely...”

The original report has curves that stretch into 2021.

13/
"The result is a public that’s extremely confused about the aims of sheltering in place and the overall plan, and feeling like the goalposts have been changed—which is dangerous in a conspiracy-laden media ecosystem."

14/
"Th[e] ... curve has made people misunderstand the nature of the problem & its management. It’s not like you flatten the curve and the problem goes away."

"Flattening the curve pushes the deaths from the virus later in time, & in theory, minimizes deaths..."

15/
"Second, the curve only captures one metric, typically deaths or hospital capacity... Deaths & hospital capacity are obviously important metrics. But the list of other things that policy must also contend with is long, and much harder to render as data..."

16/
"[T]he singular curve doesn’t encourage a conversation about choices in how the intervention is designed & deployed."

[The details matter & can have significant impacts. We are seeing this now (or will see) with weakening of restrictions in recent the days & weeks.]

17/
"The lesson here might be “multiple curves are better than one curve,” but even that accepts the contextual limitations. What’s really needed is a multidimensional operating space in which the systemic follow-on effects are identified in broad daylight."

18/
"This year may see a populist backlash against modeling, against the role of simulations or big data in policy."

Have a read of the post. I don't agree with all (or might nuance it differently), but lots of good & relevant points...

strelkamag.com/en/article/the…

/end
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Glen Peters

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!