The Real-Time Tragedy of Aggregation in the Age of COVID19
1/ The current health tragedy surrounding the spread of COVID19 cannot be discounted, however the real tragedy isn't the health crisis, it's the aggregation of power (both economic / political) with the virus as pretext.
2/ This thesis is clear based on 2 trends:
a. The consolidation of monetary power with "the Fed" in terms of money creation -> disintermediation of banks.
b. The destruction of global SMEs during the current supply / demand crisis to the favor of large e-commerce.
3/ Both consolidations have a common thread - digitization. In the former, the aversion to un-monitorable cash drives credit creation via CB ledger adjustments & swap lines, culminating in the CBDC issuance. In the latter, the consolidation around e-commerce supply (Amazon).
4/ This thread is inspired primarily by the latest @RealVision interview with @scientificecon. My admiration should betray the fact that I believe this endorsement to be incredibly underrated:
5/ The main takeways from the interview, for me, was how lower interest rate policy w/out conditional credit creation by the Fed has two primary impacts: 1. Intentional creation of asset bubbles for the long game of power consolidation 2. Disintermediation of small banks for same
6/ Why are CBs interested in fostering / supporting credit bubbles? W/ out conspiracy I think it's because of the natural incentives provided by their charter clashing w/ the incentives of large banks to control capital flows. CBs have hit an influence limit but want more.
7/ As each credit bubble creates systemic leverage and inevitable busts, the markets become increasingly dependent on monetary policy. Reserve currency status has provided for an exceptional privilege in this regard for the Fed. The markets are now almost entirely Fed dependent.
8/ The next victim of Central Banks will be the banking network of SMEs, and this aligns with the centralization trends of e-commerce giants. At the end of the day, banks are supposed to be risk assessors. A network of banks having the real-time, geographic telemetry to assess.
9/ With low interest rates the network of marginal banks will continue to be disintermediated and local risk assessment will collapse. The mega banks, with the largest capital reserves to weather boom/busts will consolidate power / underwriting. This supports e-commerce giants.
10/ The final blow will be when the Central Bank no longer tolerates interference by the Tier 1 banks, enter the CBDC. The CBDC and an open credit window directly to SMEs and retail is the final blow to mega banks because all of the telemetry & control will flow to CBs.
11/ The only problem with CBDCs is that risk assessment of millions of SMEs is impossible for a Central Bank (at least until they figure out how to use AI to do so at scale with the multivariate factors impacting local risk).
12/ To ameliorate this limitation, Central Banks can simply consolidate the business landscape into a few mega-corporates, who in of themselves disintermediated SMEs by leveraging labor/environmental arbitrage at a global scale. The cycle fuels itself and serves the 0.1%.
13/ I consider to be the root problem to be the need for infinite growth incentivizing aggregation.
15/ The macro-economic landscape at first glance appears incredibly bleak, however the emergence of P2P value transfer has the potential to transform human interactions at a more fundamental level by disintermediating the aggregators once and for all.
16/ What happens in the end game? What does it look like when the FANGs drive 90% of all digital & e-commerce traffic in the US? Alibaba in Asia, etc.? What happens when global CBs become the only risk assessors and incentives become purely political? Soviet Union level collapse.
17/ What is the only practical counter-narrative to these mega trend? Decentralization. The digitization of real world assets. The creation of markets with liquidity, flexibility, & transparency without 3rd party intermediaries. The solution will come from the people & software.
18/ One tenant is most likely true, if the current system fails to service the majority, the majority will seek an alternative. In the absence of an alternative the majority will revolt with aggression & violence but with an alternative there can be peace and equity.
19/ We have a long way to go for the current system to collapse, but when it does it will be sudden & dramatic. Instead of concerning ourselves with the daily injustices / indignities of the current system we should be concerning ourselves with building an alternative.
20/ We should focus on building decentralized structures, resilient & redundant supply chains, liquid governance, digitized assets, data quality, self-sovereignty, digital identity, local risk assessment w/ global investment rails, etc .We should be building the Internet of Value
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some trolling for this beautiful Saturday morning is in order: 1. @a16z is a Silicon Valley Web 2 supporter of platforms building Web 3 applications on top of public permissionless networks. 2. Case in point, @opensea was funded in lead Series A (it's VCs all the way down)
4. Opensea generates incredible revenues (extractive rent in the form of fees) from its users (which builders of ETH cheer on because it feeds the deflationary burn narrative in the incessant battle with BTC maxis, got to love it).
1/ CBDCs often associated with a dystopian behavioral control model of governments at the individual level. What's overlooked is that we already have this in the aggregate sense today. Given proper privacy implementations, the concerns over discrete control could be ameliorated.
2/ Studies have shown that a CBDC model, wherein issuance against government debt is on the order of 30% of GDP, could increase steady state aggregate economic output by as much as 3% over the long term, while at the same time dampening the magnitude of inherent boom/bust cycles.
3/ The structure of CBDCs could theoretically be decentralized in terms of DLT (w/ interoperable sidechain BFT systems!). It is known that at current reliability thresholds existing RTGS systems are inadequate for this purpose, so new tech / private services likely to be deployed
Empire Strikes Back!
Mark my words that the traditional banking system intends to compete both technologically, & via regulatory moats, in 2022 in a manner that will shock the crypto space to the core.
The Fed/OCC/SEC will play whack-a-mole w/ VASPs/FinTech while FIs pull forward
People seriously think that the banking system will allow disruptors to unilaterally operate using their payment first rails (onramps/offramps) to destroy their business hegemony.
1/ Blockchains are unique database architectures that allow for shared state, or consensus between participants on common truth. This architecture lends itself to designating of basic property rights via tokenization & encryption (private keys).
2/ The 1st use case for property on chain was currency, designed for payments, fiat hedging, expressing/storing value on a common platform. The holder of the keys is assured by network enforcement with property rights. That's valuable in of itself & doesn't require governments.
3/ NFTs are a subset of property for a unique item set, & a misnomer w/ respect to fungibility. It's not a currency explicitly, but obviously carries value. It's a property primitive like a title on your house or car, but different in that it's digital w/ low transaction friction
One of the things that is interesting to me is teasing out the differences between how digital assets are value relative to the Bitcoin liquidity waterfall & their own inherent properties that drive their network effect inflation.
For example, one can study the narrative drive of Ethereum as a composable, smart contract platform that continues to add diverse use cases like DeFi, NFTs, AMMs, SCs, etc. (network effect drivers) vs. a single purpose digital asset like Monero (XMR), a privacy coin.
What you quickly notice is that for a while XMR & ETH traded at near parity (nascent networks without clear differentiation equally in the shadow of BTC). Once the additional network drivers took hold in ETH the deviation grew substantially.
1/6 "Hand in hand with this centralisation, or this expropriation of many capitalists by few, develop, on an ever-extending scale, the cooperative form of the labour process, the conscious technical application of science, the methodical cultivation of the soil,..."
2/6 "..the transformation of the instruments of labour into instruments of labour only usable in common, the economising of all means of production by their use as means of production of combined, socialised labour, the entanglement of all peoples in the net of the world market..
3/6 "...and with this, the international character of the capitalistic regime. Along with the constantly diminishing number of the magnates of capital, who usurp and monopolise all advantages of this process of transformation, ..."