Let’s put this in simple terms:
1. At least one of the couple was well enough to drive.
2. They do not fall into an at-risk group
3. In their age group, there is no reason to suppose either of them would become too incapacitated by COVID to be able to care for a child
..continues
1. At least one of the couple was well enough to drive.
2. They do not fall into an at-risk group
3. In their age group, there is no reason to suppose either of them would become too incapacitated by COVID to be able to care for a child
..continues
4. Even if that happened, there was no reason to suppose that they would BOTH become too incapacitated by COVID to be able to care for a child
5. Even if there was, there was no justification WHATSOEVER for them to travel and risk infecting others
..continues..
5. Even if there was, there was no justification WHATSOEVER for them to travel and risk infecting others
..continues..
6. If there HAD been any justification, then the advice to everyone with young or otherwise dependent children or adults would have been that, in the event one of you becomes ill, the entire family must move ANY distance to be close to family who can help if required
..continues
..continues
7. That would have ensured complete chaos and a massive spread of disease.
8. Which is why the advice was not to leave the house FOR ANY REASON if you had symptoms of the disease. A disease which is mild in most cases.
Cummings has to go.
#Durham
#ToryHypocrisy
8. Which is why the advice was not to leave the house FOR ANY REASON if you had symptoms of the disease. A disease which is mild in most cases.
Cummings has to go.
#Durham
#ToryHypocrisy
