This is very true, and we need to treat the New York Times Company like any other tech corporation.
It’s not some special arbiter of what it is true. It’s another entity posting on the internet, distinguished by its use of the passive voice when attacking direct competitors.
It’s not some special arbiter of what it is true. It’s another entity posting on the internet, distinguished by its use of the passive voice when attacking direct competitors.
The New York Times Company is a multibillion dollar multinational. One can argue that its monetization has improved even as its audience has narrowed.
Still, scrutiny of its every action is warranted, including from a competitive lens. It’s not neutral.
bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
Still, scrutiny of its every action is warranted, including from a competitive lens. It’s not neutral.
bloomberg.com/news/newslette…
By the way, if you are wondering just how the NYT went from the Failing New York Times to millions of digital subscribers...
nytimes.com/2019/12/18/opi…
nytimes.com/2019/12/18/opi…
