In May 2020, the @BVerfG rendered its final decision after 6 years of bondholder litigation.
[For an overview of the litigation, see my paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…] 1/x
- But the highest 🇬🇷 Court & the @ECHR_CEDH held that the CAC Retrofit was not expropriatory and did not violate the 🇬🇷 Constitution or the European Convention on Human Rights (see @astridiversen) 3/x
- The questions were whether 🇩🇪/🇦🇹 Courts had jurisdiction & 🇬🇷 immunity.
- The @EUCourtPress denied both.
(curia.europa.eu/juris/document…) 4/x
- Since the 🇬🇷 CAC Retrofit relied on a 🇬🇷 law passed by the 🇬🇷 Parliament, it enjoyed immunity in foreign courts. (see for a discussion -- papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…). 6/x
- In sum, not a single bondholder successfully the 🇬🇷 CAC Retrofit (background --> onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…). 7/x
- For implications, see @ManuelidesY's paper: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…. On whether 🇮🇹 could emulate the 🇬🇷 strategy: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…. 8/x