There are many new exciting trials in transthyretin #amyloidosis – as we continue to enroll patients in the CARDIO-TTRansform trial, I thought I would highlight some of these trials in ATTR-CM
If you recall, 2 main approaches to treating ATTR #amyloidosis with approved drugs (figure credit @frederickruberg@maz_hanna )
1)Stabilizers: bind to the TTR tetramer to stabilize it. #tafamidis , AG-10, diflunisal
2)Silencers: Inotersen and Patisiran
tafamidis is prescribed to ATTR-CM pts & inotersen/patisiran for those with hATTR polyneuropathy
But – 2 main questions in ATTR-CM
1)Which is associated with better outcomes – silencer or stabilizer?
2)Is the combination of silencer+stabilizer superior to stabilizer only?
CARDIO-TTRansform (n=750 pts) is designed to answer these questions (besides efficacy of a new silencer). Primary outcome in CV mortality+CV events.
The trial is stratified by:
tafamidis use, NYHA class I/II vs III, wtATTR vs hATTR, 6MWT (< or > 350 m)
So patients are allowed to continue on tafamidis (without restrictions) and are randomized to placebo vs silencer - a key difference that separates CARDIO-TTRansform from other trials discussed below
>95% of our ATTR-CM pts are on tafamidis or AG10
What does this silencer do? It is a 2nd generation of the already approved inotersen. Its current name is AKCEA-TTR-Lrx. Similar to inotersen, it is an anti-sense oligonucleotide (ASO) --> targets TTR pre-mRNA to inhibit TTR production (both wt and vTTR)
TTR-Lrx --> liver using ligand-conjugated ASO (LICA). Using GalNAc, it targets hepatocytes (ASGPR). Conjugation --> 30x increase in potency compared w/ unconjugated ASO--> benefit of lower doing frequency, increased potency, & dosing at lower volume.
In a phase I study, TTR-Lrx successfully silenced TTR production without adverse effects on platelets, kidney or liver.
key inclusion criteria in CARDIO-TTRansform:
ATTR-CM, NYHA class I-III, NTproBNP >/= 600 (or 1200 in AF), GFR >/= 30
Other trials in the ATTR space:
ATTRIBUTE-CM is another exciting trial of AG10, a stabilizer of TTR tetramer. N=510 (2:1), primary outcomes: 1)change in 6MWT and 2)all-cause death + CV hosp frequency. Tafamidis only allowed after 12 months clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03…
APOLLO-B is another trial in ATTR-CM testing patisiran vs placebo. N=300. Primary outcome is change from baseline at month 12 in 6MWT. A key inclusion criteria is “tafamidis naïve or on tafamidis for ≥6 months with evidence of disease progression”
HELIOS-B is another trial in ATTR-CM testing vutrisiran (q3m) against placebo in a 600 patient trial. Outcome: all-cause mortality and CV hosp. A key point in the trial design: up to 30% only can receive tafamidis
NEURO-TTRansform – testing TTR-Lrx against Inotersen. No placebo, no tafamidis. hATTR with polyneuropathy (since both are active treatment arms, no other TTR therapies allowed) clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04…
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Preclinical and phase I data for $AKCA-TTR-LRx (second generation inotersen, ASO conjugated with GalNAc), currently being tested in CARDIO-TTRansform, the largest #ATTR#Amyloidosis trial to date. Tafamidis allowed without restrictions.
A thread.
So the @US_FDA@SGottliebFDA issued a warning re: Fluoroquinolones (FLQ) and aortic dissection (AD) or aneurysm (AA). Do FLQs cause AD/AA? Not really. Is there an association? Maybe. Let’s go throw the evidence and you can decide for yourself. #CardioTwitter#MedEd
1/ Why was this association even studied? FLQ are known to be associated with Achilles tendon rupture, tendinopathy, retinal detachment. How? 1)decrease collagen synthesis and increase MMP (especially 2, 9) activity (among others). Aorta is affected by these processes
2/First study was published in 2015 using a national database in Taiwan. 1477 cases (662 AD, 850 AA) matched to 147 700 controls. There was signal of the association of FLQ and AD; rate ratio ranging 1.37 - 2.11 with any FLQ use (tinyurl.com/ybhcpexz)
A great case of bicuspid-associated aortopathy.
How common is aortic dissection in BAV? To date, many surgeons operate on patients with dilated aortas in the 4.5-5.0 cm range without concomitant severe valve disease. But, how about the evidence so far? #cardiotwitter#MedEd
1/ A long thread on LifeVest. I promise it will be entertaining. If you find any inaccuracies please let me know.
Paper of VEST published here - will discuss background to WCD and #VEST but not the trial itself nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…
2/ In 2001, FDA gave approval to Lifecor for the first WCD. Later Lifecor was acquired by Zoll (2004 agreement, 2006 acquisition). Zoll maintains a registry for prescribed LifeVests. But lets go back to the FDA approval process.
3/ Lifecor presented 2 separate prospective studies to the FDA; WEARIT and BIROAD. FDA asked for both to be combined into 1 study, and each study representing a subgroup. A total of 289 patients were included.