Remember 'Levelling Up'? Set to be one of the big themes of the Johnson government, before #Covid19UK intervened
Well... in jobs terms, #COVID19 is if anything a 'level-downer': regions of the UK with higher unemployment have seen a bigger increase in unemployment than the rest, as estimated through uptake of furlough and other schemes
So how could this be addressed? New report from @ECIU_UK, written by @jessralston2 and launched at a media briefing today, suggests home energy retrofits provide a decent route in
First up, we show there's quite a correlation between areas where Covid is stoking unemployment and those with high rates of households living in fuel poverty: ie, areas where the problem is worst are also those where the opportunity is biggest
Some of these areas (eg W Midlands) are also industrial areas where there is already a skills base to be leveraged. And construction is one of the sectors hit hardest by Covid
Energy retrofits create mainly local jobs and bring down energy bills, providing a localised double benefit. As @emily_energy from @EnergiesprongUK told our briefing, investment creates a wide range of jobs including 'softer' ones in, for example, customer liaison
She also told us that now, #COVID__19 isn't a bar to working in peoples' homes: now the acute phase is past, homeowners and tenants are generally happy to have work progressing, with sensible measures adopted to reduce the risk
In those totemic 'Red Wall' constituencies, it turns out, increasing all homes to EPC Band C rating by 2030 is projected to more than counteract the GVA decrease incurred during coronavirus
THREAD: Seen a bit of chat recently implying that the UK shouldn't put pedal to the metal on decarbonisation as it's so far gone faster than US - which is true, it has
The implication is that somehow this speed has been bad for the UK economy. The data say otherwise
Since 1990, UK GDP has increased 3.45-fold, according to the World Bank. The US, 3.42-fold. Basically, identical data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.G…
THREAD: With all the talk #cop28 centring on #fossilfuelphaseout or not – abated, unabated, etc – what actually is the logical role of CCS in the energy transition?
In a new paper for @thesmithschool @uniofoxford, Dr Andrea Bacilieri, Dr Rupert Way and I analyse the relative costs of taking a high-CCS vs a low-CCS route to #netzero and the 1.5°C temperature goal – a question that as far as we can see hasn’t been properly asked before
Hilarious to see @NetZeroWatch plugging this 'dangers of woke banking' line... here's their chairman's own company's sustainability page 😂😂😂 recordfg.com/sustainability/
I have deep reservations about this 'people who live near wind farms should get cheap electricity' thing, which has reached a new depth today with a recommendation that they should get free electricity
It would only make sense if people were opposed to having wind farms nearby, and there's a welter of evidence in a range of countries showing that the majority of people aren't opposed (eg sciencedirect.com/science/articl…)
THREAD: Climate change causes conflict, you say? Well: it's a bit more complex than that
Climate change and other facets of the global environmental crisis raise the risks of conflict and other forms of insecurity. But so do many other things - competition for resources, ethnic tensions, prior conflicts, pandemics...
And there is already a growing security crisis. Over the last 10 years (well before #Covid and Putin's war) the number of state-based armed conflicts, the number of people killed in them and the number of people displaced all roughly doubled
This is also a nod to all those lining up to pontificate that '1.5°C is dead', particularly scientists who make no attempt to clarify that that what they're saying is just their opinion, not fact
Firstly let's look at the #ParisAgreement's wording - to 'hold' warming 'well below 2°C' while 'making efforts' to keep it to 1.5°C. There is no time limit on that 'making efforts'. Governments did not pledge to make efforts until warming exceeds 1.5°C and then stop