Do you think someone should have to wait 5 years to get an abortion? Does that seem nonsensical to you? Well folks, it’s time to talk about “third-party standing”, a sneaky part of #JuneVRusso that could have huge ramifications for abortion access. 1/7 abcnews.go.com/Politics/expla…
Very late in the game Louisiana asked #SCOTUS to consider who actually has the right to sue them for their bad laws. Currently, abortion clinics can advocate on behalf of patients, but Louisiana is pushing SCOTUS to say: NO DICE, only patients can sue. 2/7 #MyRightMyDecision
Louisiana argues that abortion providers — who risk death to care for patients — don't have their patient's interests at heart. Maybe they just do it because a job without doxxing and bomb threats seemed boring? #MyRightMyDecision 3/7
Patients, of course, could always sue. But to put it into perspective, this Louisiana law is from 2014. Last I checked pregnancy was 9 months. The patient in “Some Vulnerable Person v. Russo” would have a 5-year old by now. 4/7
Five to fifty years of shame, scrutiny, and terror, and I won't get my abortion anyway? Sounds fun, sign me up! 5/7 thedailybeast.com/jane-roe-confe…
Losing standing here would mean undoing decades of precedent and it would get pending cases challenging anti-abortion laws (like Georgia’s 6-week ban) thrown out. If Texas wants to close all clinics without a sauna and a helipad, who's to stop them? 6/7 theintercept.com/2020/02/10/lou…
So pay attention Monday (oh boy, PLEASE decide by Monday #SCOTUS, we can’t take the waiting) to the Russo decision! It’s got layer upon layer of potential disaster, and “third-party standing” is just one part of it! #MyRightMyDecision 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
