Thread by @EL_Wi11

5) Only her understanding for under what justification the Flynn/Kislyak calls existed is in question.

Considering that it was highly classified raw intel one might think she'd want to be ultra clear and certain about all of this one way or the other.

6) Same goes for Obama, Biden, and the entire rest of the gang. They are all in a catch .22. here.

They are discussing intel that shouldn't exist in a raw format in their presence, shouldn't be used for law enforcement purposes, & yet no discussion of its origins, legality etc?

7) This is not even a close call. It's 'wiretapping' someone for law enforcement purposes without a warrant all with the knowledge and approval of the very highest levels of government up to and including Rice, Biden, and Obama.

8) So we must ask what were they really up to in that meeting on January 5th? First of all are we even sure the meeting was on the 5th? Seems w/ Strzok's new note revelation that could be in question. What evidence supports it? Rice's self addressed alibi email and what else?

9) I'm not sure what other records support that date for the meeting, (white house visitors logs, other principal's testimony, statements to SCO/FBI etc), but this date thing right now is really nagging at me.

Seems important for some unknown reason. It's just not adding up.

10) After the date issue why is it rarely discussed that it seems they were really just parallel constructing a case against Flynn in the White House? A lot of people understand how this works but it's rarely discussed.

11) Rice makes it clear in her testimony that she's fully aware of the IC/LE wall. Everyone in that room was aware of the IC/LE wall...that's kinda the whole point here.

Why isn't this being thoroughly scrutinized? Who knew/admitted what, when, and with what discrepancies etc?

12) Do the dates all add up with the right perspective based on what we have so far or are we just missing the pieces of the puzzle required to understand the bigger picture?

I don't know but I do know that as of yet the 5 January date doesn't seem to be adding up.

13) If anyone can point to other instances of the 5 January White House meeting date in any testimony etc please let me know. I'd like to get a better grasp of the bigger picture here.

END

Pls add material relevant to my "Date-gate" theory/speculation/concern below.

Thanks.

~~~~

Here Sally Yates acknowledges the January 5th date and it's discussed several times.

p. 78 House testimony November 3, 2017

intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/…

Here @HansMahncke has pictured the letter, (via email), revealing the Strzok notes to #teamflynn . Dates given by the AUSA are "believed to be" between January 3 and January 5.