After that thread about @Wayfair 👇, we received tons of replies from people that felt our reporting wasn’t as thorough as it could have been, so we did some more research to get to the bottom of it.
FYI this is @mediawise editorial director @kriswellesley chiming in here. I think it’s important that we figure out whether the children’s names we’re constantly seeing associated with this conspiracy are in fact missing. So here we go...
Yaritza Castro, Samara Duplessis, Cameron Dziedzic, Mary Durrett, Kylah Coleman & Samiyah Mumin are all allegedly missing and connected to Wayfair because their names were used in a pillow or cabinet product listing.
Of these 6 kids, only ONE of them is currently missing -- Yaritza Castro. She was last seen in CT on June 10. We didn’t find any evidence she has been found. Contact @MissingKids if you have information. api.missingkids.org/poster/NCMC/13…
As for Samara Duplessis, she went missing in May and was back home the next day, according to her parents’ Facebook posts. They’ve even posted photos of her since then spending time with her family.
The St. Mary’s County, MD Sheriff’s Office blog reported Cameron Dziedzic missing in April and has since been updated to reflect he’s been found. firstsheriff.blogspot.com/2020/04/missin…
Kylah Coleman was missing back in January, but her name doesn’t appear on the @CLEpolice missing person list today. She joined @theangiestanton on Instagram Live recently and confirmed she was missing, but is back home now. instagram.com/tv/CCe_grDBz_Q/
Lastly, there’s Samiyah Mumin. In a recent Facebook Live, she was visibly upset about being caught up in the conspiracy and says she was never missing & isn’t being trafficked. You can watch the video here, just know she uses profanity.
So, to summarize, based on our research, only 1 of the 6 children are currently missing. Others, 4 of 6, have returned home and 1 says she was never missing. Though, we did find this story that was published to @newsbreakApp that seems to conflict. newsbreak.com/news/0Lmuxd0G/…
We also saw a lot of responses suggesting these cabinets and pillows shouldn’t be so expensive. Be mindful that .@Wayfair, like .@amazon, is a clearinghouse, with over 11,000 vendors.
According to @vox, when a customer places an order, Wayfair sources the product from a vendor and ships it to them. They’re the middle-man for vendors who produce the same item and sell it to different brands under different names. vox.com/2019/8/28/2083…
.@Wayfair also crossposts the same products to several different sites, even direct competitors and fellow “house” brands. And the prices for the same products change constantly.
So could a cabinet really cost $10K? YES! Airtight and/or impenetrable industrial cabinets - like one that holds drugs locked up in a hospital - can cost that and sometimes more. I found these on @amazon for $23K and over $15K.
All in all, we appreciate the constructive feedback we received! We hope this clears the confusion. Sometimes fact-checking requires a simple Google search. Other times, much more. I have 66 tabs open right now just working on this thread!
Just remember that not all sources are reliable and some will lead you down the wrong path. Stick with reliable and trustworthy sources when fact-checking. If you see a claim you want us to check, use #isthislegit to let us know!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵of tips to help you at the ballot box and scrolling social media today – specifically for those who are new to or nervous about voting. First of all, get excited! It’s every voter’s civic duty to participate in democracy. Take a deep breath. You got this! 💪 #ElectionDay
Want more info? vote411.org/select-state has state-specific details for voting, along with instructions on how to get a free ride to the polls from @lyft.
Tap into your local news outlets today. You’ll find specific information on voting rules, polling locations and everything else you need to know. Example, @TB_Times walks readers through voting in #TampaBay: tampabay.com/news/florida-p…
This morning, trusted news outlets confirmed that Russia attacked Ukraine. During any global crisis, you’ll see visceral images and videos on social media claiming to show bombing, tanks — military action. Now more than ever, you need to stop and ask @SHEG_Stanford’s 3 Q’s:
First, when you see a post like this one, ask yourself: Who shared it? Are they an expert? Are they biased toward one side of the conflict?
Go to their profile. Use quotes to search for exact matches for their name: “@WorldNewsWWIII”. The profile isn’t verified, and while it claims to be a news source — it’s been around for a month. DON’T SHARE.
The queen, my lord, is… not dead. Yesterday Twitter was abuzz after #HollywoodUnlocked published an “exclusive” claiming Queen Elizabeth II died. Good news: Several reputable news sources denied the claim. Bad news: This isn’t the last time we’ll see a celebrity death hoax🧵
We’re @MediaWise, and we teach people all over the world how to be smarter consumers of news and information online. Long story short, we know a thing or two about how to make sure the info you’re reading online is legit.
We figured now’s a good time to chat about how to assess breaking news about celebrity deaths responsibly. When you see a claim that someone famous/important/popular has died, WAIT IT OUT. These stories are enticing, but facts can often be distorted or left out.
The Knight Media Forum just started and ✌️ of our very own MediaWise ambassadors will be panelists today 👀 @JulioVaqueiro will be on a panel talking about misinfo in communities of color and @davejorgenson will be on another sharing his expertise on reaching the youth.
.@JulioVaqueiro became an ambassador this year as part of our efforts to help Spanish speakers confidently navigate their social media feeds. In a 10-day text message course, he and @jdbalart share key digital media literacy tips. poy.nu/verifica
.@davejorgenson has been with us for a couple of years now helping us connect with teens and college students. Here's a throwback to a TikTok we worked on together: tiktok.com/@mediawise/vid…
Right now you’re probably seeing hundreds of photos and videos from the chaotic scene on #CapitolHill at the #CapitolBuilding. Or are you?
When protestors began streaming into D.C. yesterday, an unverified Twitter account with less than 1,000 followers shared a photo claiming to show the action that racked up more than 14,000 RTs. It’s false.
It was ACTUALLY an image from the 2018 #MarchForOurLives protest. Using out-of-context pics is one way bad actors push disinformation out to thousands of social feeds during breaking news events. You could have figured that out right away with a reverse image search.
Social media is hitting a fever pitch about the lockdown at the #CapitolBuilding. Please STOP before you click retweet or re-share anything you see on this subject and ask yourself these 3 key questions to fact-check it and prevent yourself from sharing misinformation... (THREAD)
1. WHO IS BEHIND THE INFORMATION? Click on their bio. Are they an expert on the subject // verified? Why should you trust what they say? Any indications they have an agenda? Any bot-like activity on their account? If you have an extra sec, Google them. Any red flags?
2. WHAT IS THE EVIDENCE? What in their post proves to you what they are claiming is accurate? Be skeptical. Do they provide context? Social media rewards short form posts, if you don't have enough info in the post to answer this question, go on to question 3...