One of the many well deserved hits against Trump is his inability to perform the Presidential ritual of “bringing the country together” after a tragedy. I’d argue that this is what makes Trump the greatest civil rights President since LBJ.
Wait, what? Hear me out...
When President Obama led a church assembly in a tearful rendition of “Amazing Grace,” he was performing the expected role of Pastor in Chief, Presidential Mourner, and Compassionate Witness. He was helping the country’s wounds heal.
And that’s the problem.
When wounds heal, if they aren’t properly attended, they form ugly scars and can become infected. Presidential empathy is like a good bedside manner— it’s great, but if it isn’t accompanied by actual medicine, it can create a false sense of wellness.
Presidents from Reagan to Clinton (especially Clinton) to GWB and of course Obama have been very good at the Pastor in Chief leader shtick. And by being good at it, they’ve allowed the majority of Americans to think the problems of racial and social justice are being attended.
But those problems haven’t been attended to, and the scarred over wounds haven’t been healed. And now, thanks to Trump’s complete inability to perform the role of Empathetic Leader, the average American is seeing the truth that other Empathetic Leaders hid.
Imagine if the #BLM 2020 movement had tried to rise under Obama. He would have seen it as his duty to perform empathy, he would have addressed the issues poignantly and powerfully, and average Americans would have relaxed, assured that Something Would Be Done.
And nothing would be done.
Trump, on the other hand, by not performing empathy, lays bare the naked reality. He allows the wound to remain open. He lets everyone see the torn, bleeding tissue. The patient dying on the stretcher. No bedside manner, no comforting words.
That’s why Trump is the best thing to happen to the cause of racial and social justice in decades. He isn’t comforting. He’s letting America see that it’s bleeding out and the people in charge don’t care.
Sunday political 🧵: Federalism is the hope and the scourge of progressivism in America. The U.S. has a federal system of political power division; conservatives understand this on a practical political leverage level, progressives don’t.
Up until recently, every school kid learned about the federal system (I don’t know if they still do; schooling has changed a lot since I went), but mostly in our daily lives we ignore it and think we live in a unified nation governed by a single set of laws. We actually don’t.
We I say “federal” you probably think “the Government” and you think of Washington as the seat of government. But that isn’t what federal means at all. Its basis is “federation”— and if you’re a Star Trek fan, maybe the penny is dropping.
A question I’m often asked at conventions is “How do you break into comics?” I have no idea— the last time I tried it was 1967. But a better question might be: “How do you write a ‘good’ comic?” For that, I have a few ideas.
First, foremost: Read. Read a lot. Don’t just read comics, read books. Lots and lots of books. Always have a book with you and read at every opportunity. Read at lunch, be that weirdo. Read on the bus. On planes. On trains. Don’t read while driving.
Second, vital: Keep reading. Read fiction, read non-fiction, read history, science, economics, more fiction, “literature,” mysteries, science fiction, westerns. Stuff yourself with words. Ideas. Odd facts and bits of legend. Poetry, Shakespeare, e.e. cummings, doggerel.
People often asked me this past year*— “Gerry, how do you maintain a mostly cheerful attitude in your daily life, despite daily news accounts of misery, death, and human stupidity?”
“Well,” I tell them, “I practice the patented DDD Sanity Preservation Self-Protection System™!”
*nobody asks me.
What is this patented system of DDD Sanity Preservation™, you may ask? I shall be happy to explain. Thusly.
I have very loud neighbors. Just putting that here.
It’s like living next to a sports bar.
To put this in perspective, this is a quiet suburban neighborhood. The folks who own the house and live in it are 30-40-something with kids. Like the Dunphys in Modern Family. They’re now singing drunkenly, loudly, out of tune.
Spoiler free reaction to Zack Snyder's JL: I wish the man who made this movie had made "Man of Steel" and "BvS". Maybe Snyder took to heart some of the criticism of those two movies, because tonally this is a different piece-- a paean to the power of hope and healing.
I also understand why Ray Fisher was so upset by the "restructuring" of the film (aside from his reports of abusive behavior): The major human emotional arc of this film belongs to Victor Stone, and its loss in the theatrical JL cuts the heart out of the story.
I don't know whether it was because of WB's demand for a much shorter film, and the necessity that created for reshoots to elipsize chunks of plot, which in turn rushed the CGI work, but, boy, does this "rebuilt" cut kick ass visually.
I’ve heard some on the left worry @JoeBiden won’t be progressive enough, won’t fight back against #GOP perfidy, etc., because he’s always been a moderate. Hey. Who a President was, politically, before he becomes President, and what he “stood for”, is historically irrelevant.
Lincoln wasn’t in favor of abolition when he ran for President; he ran as a “moderate” against slavery’s expansion, not its elimination. He fought against emancipation for months until he finally came around. His opponents in the South forced him to change.
FDR ran as a fiscal, social *conservative* in 1932, promising a balanced budget and no deficits. His political party had other ideas— most New Deal legislation was a result of FDR watering down those ideas, not pushing them forward. He took bold action because he *had* to.