1) Why is @Wikipedia biased & #antiHindu?
Ans: Wikipedia’s mission is to summarize "accepted knowledge" from “reliable source”. Inconvenient facts are not part of “accepted knowledge” or published by so-called “reliable source”.
Ans: Wikipedia’s mission is to summarize "accepted knowledge" from “reliable source”. Inconvenient facts are not part of “accepted knowledge” or published by so-called “reliable source”.
2)Anyone can edit Wikipedia?
Ans: No. Wikipedia has 4 levels of bureaucracy: Administrators, Bureaucrats, Supreme Court & Stewards ABSS. ABSS promotes group think, in-group favoritism & hostility to inconvenient facts. Only ABSS approved opinion is allowed @Wikipedia
Ans: No. Wikipedia has 4 levels of bureaucracy: Administrators, Bureaucrats, Supreme Court & Stewards ABSS. ABSS promotes group think, in-group favoritism & hostility to inconvenient facts. Only ABSS approved opinion is allowed @Wikipedia
Q3. What is “accepted-knowledge” & “reliable-source” @Wikipedia?
Ans: ABSS decides who is reliable-source and what is accepted-knowledge. Wikipedia editor's decided that @anuragkashyap72 is "reliable source"; So, @TheJaggi & @SwarajyaMag are black-listed:
Ans: ABSS decides who is reliable-source and what is accepted-knowledge. Wikipedia editor's decided that @anuragkashyap72 is "reliable source"; So, @TheJaggi & @SwarajyaMag are black-listed:
Q4. Do @Wikipedia rely on facts or experts?
Ans: No. As per Wikipedia, “2002 Gujarat Riots” meet "legal definition of genocide" b'cos Desi Deva a book on S. Asian American women declared it "genocide". Book has 0 reviews on amazon & has nothing to do with riots. @Gujaratriotscom
Ans: No. As per Wikipedia, “2002 Gujarat Riots” meet "legal definition of genocide" b'cos Desi Deva a book on S. Asian American women declared it "genocide". Book has 0 reviews on amazon & has nothing to do with riots. @Gujaratriotscom
Q5. Does @Wikipedia rules like "neutral pov", "5 pillars", "reliable source" etc apply to ABSS?
Ans: No b'cos ABSS is the judge, jury & executioner. Any dubious sources (eg. Desi Deva) supporting ABSS agenda is deemed neutral & excellent source like @SwarajyaMag are deemed biased
Ans: No b'cos ABSS is the judge, jury & executioner. Any dubious sources (eg. Desi Deva) supporting ABSS agenda is deemed neutral & excellent source like @SwarajyaMag are deemed biased
Q6. Can @Wikipedia article camouflage as propaganda tool?
Ans: Yes. ABSS misuses power. For example, "2002 Gujarat riots" page peddles "genocide" propaganda by using anchoring effect, dubious source & power of repetition (article is peppered with words like genocide, pogrom etc).
Ans: Yes. ABSS misuses power. For example, "2002 Gujarat riots" page peddles "genocide" propaganda by using anchoring effect, dubious source & power of repetition (article is peppered with words like genocide, pogrom etc).
Q7. Can @Wikipedia article camouflage as attack page?
Ans. Yes. "2020 Delhi riots" page was started as attack on @KapilMishra_IND. It repeated words "Mishra" 16times & declared him lead figure responsible for 11deaths & 170injuries. ABSS loved it& placed it on wikipedia home page
Ans. Yes. "2020 Delhi riots" page was started as attack on @KapilMishra_IND. It repeated words "Mishra" 16times & declared him lead figure responsible for 11deaths & 170injuries. ABSS loved it& placed it on wikipedia home page
