I prefer to make this as meaningful as possible, but often we’re so time constrained I’m forced to kept it brief (2-3 min is as ‘brief’ as I’ll go) /2
E.g., significance as Indigenous protocol, importance unsettling settler spaces, process reality of colonialism, value of representation, etc. /3
How does your interpretation/action of those events change upon reflecting on the land and colonial history? /13
The point is they’re fluid, adaptable, reflective, responsive /14
What doesn’t look good is the lip-service acknowledgements that are hastily read and include no personal reflection /15
Other Indigenous people, communities, regions will have different ways. Become comfortable with that fluidity /19
In my realm, I think universities and academic societies have a lot of room to voluntarily engage/do more with the subject
native-land.ca