Blood quantum was a racist practice of diminishing “Indian-ness” that settlers used to shrink the Indigenous population in the United States. This was a system of Indigenous identification that allowed for settlers to justify taking Indigenous peoples’ lands and obliterating
Tribal communities. On the other hand, settlers identified Black people under a maternal one-drop-of-Blood policy that stated that all people with any African ancestry were Black and all people born of Black enslaved mothers were automatically slaves.
These systems of racial grouping and identification allowed for white settlers to both expand their land holdings—taken from Indigenous people as they were “absorbed into whiteness”—and expand their ownership in enslaved people. They were able to both take land
And increase their labor force for working on said land. With Freedmen, racial identification was conplicated. In many tribal bands and communities, people of both Indigneous and Black ancestry were considered just as Indigenous as people mixed with white blood.
However, in most documented instances in the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations, all people of any prtial African ancestry were identified as Black and tainted. In the Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations, being of prtial white ancestry did not “taint” a person’s Indigeneity or preclude
Them from tribal membership or land. On the other hand, if a person was seen as being of any partial African ancestry, their “Indigenous-ness” was completely tainted. They were seen and treated as Black, tainted, human beings meant to be enslaved for profit.
We must wrestle with the legacies of selective Blood Quantum policies today. Many Freedmen have ancestors who were of “Choctaw/Chickasaw Blood,” but have no listed Blood Qunatum on the Dawes Rolls. On the other hand, there are Chickasaws and Choctaws who are 1/1024 Blood Quantum
But who are identified as white and are granted full tribal, citizenship, and economic rights. This all stems from settler notions of “Blood Quantum” and one-drop-of-Black-blood policies.
Today, the tribe requires all citizens to prove they have at least one ancestor on the Dawes Rolls of any Blood Quantum, no matter how small. Freedmen were systematically put on the Dawes Rolls without a Blood Quantum, no matter their ancestry.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Choctaw & Chickasaw Freedmen

Choctaw & Chickasaw Freedmen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChoctawFreedmen

12 Oct
You do realize that Indigenous slave-ownership continued after colonization? We are the descendants of people of African descent owned by Indigenous people from the Choctaw and Chickasaw Nations. Colonization didn’t “end” enslavement by Indigenous people.
Colonization led to the enslavement of the people Indigenous to this land by European colonizers, enslavement of people of African descent owned by both European and Indigenous people, and mass rape, murder, and the spreading of never-seen-before diseases.
Colonization in North America was a violent process in which European colonizers—in order to extract resources from the land and from the Indigenous people on the land and the African people they brought to this land—raped, killed, and harmed Black and Indigenous people.
Read 5 tweets
12 Oct
A reminder on this #IndigenousPeoplesDay #IndigenousPeoplesDay2020 that many Black Native people are not enrolled in their tribes of origin because of historical and current anti-Black citizenship policies.
In the Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations, descendants of people of African descent enslaved by tribal members are actively excluded from citizenship rights and tribal programs due to our ancestors’ statuses as enslaved people. We were promised citizenship in the Treaty of 1866.
Are we not “Indigenous” because our tribes have broken their treaty promises of citizenship? To exclude us from Indigeneity is to affirm our tribes’ anti-Black policies and histories. For many programs today, in order to be considered Indigenous, one must be enrolled
Read 4 tweets
12 Oct
Happy #IndigenousPeoplesDay! A reminder that there are many different groups of Black Native people within the United States and that often our ties to Indigenous Nations are through violence and slavery at the hands of Indigenous people. Our ancestors were resilient!
Not all relationships between Black and Native people were ones of mutual respect. Not all Native nations assisted runaway slaves. In fact, some Native nations—like the Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations—recaptured and re-enslaved runaway slaves of African descent.
This doesn’t negate our Indigenous ancestry, but certainly complicates it. Our introduction to our tribes of origin was not through peace or mutual understanding, but through violence, forced labor, and forced migration on the Trail of Tears while enslaved.
Read 14 tweets
11 Oct
This official Choctaw Nation supplemental guide for teaching about the McGirt v. Oklahoma decision is full of misinterpretations of the history, omits histories of Black people and Freedmen, and erases the Choctaw Nation’s clear history of anti-Blackness. (Thread)
First of all, in the official guide, the authors state that “If people who were not Choctaw tribal members respected Choctaw laws, they could visit the Choctaw Nation, work there, or even become Choctaw citizens,” in post-Removal Indian Territory. Image
This statement holds true if the individual in question was white or non-Black from another Indigenous tribe. However, Black people (both of Choctaw heritage and devoid of Choctaw heritage) were specifically barred from living in the Choctaw Nation boundaries if they were free.
Read 21 tweets
20 Sep
Did you know that the last person to surrender on the side of the Confederacy was a Cherokee slave-owner named Stand Watie? He owned a large plantation in Spavinaw Creek in the Indian Territory. #NativeHistory #CivilWar
As staunch slave owners, factions from each of the Five Slaveholding Tribes fought alongside the Confederate army. Their reasons for fighting for the Confederacy were complex, but they were motivated in part to fight for the Confederacy in order to continue owning Black slaves.
On the other hand, Black enslaved people fought for freedom from bondage by fighting with the 1st Kansas Colored Volunteer Infantry Regiment on the Union side of the war.
Read 5 tweets
6 Aug
Just in case anyone was unaware: the Choctaw Nation chose to legalize chattel slavery within the tribe. Tribal members owned slaves of African descent and many enslaved people walked the Trail of Tears with their masters during Indian Removal.
Once in Indian Territory in present-day Oklahoma, Choctaws continued owning slaves and slaves built much of the infrastructure in Indian Territory. Slaves rebelled. For example, many Choctaw slaves participated in the 1840 Slave Rebellion in the Cherokee Nation to escape bondage.
Slaves performed difficult labor under the threat of and with actual violence. The Choctaw Nation had slave patrols as well.

Correction: the Cherokee Slave Rebellion took place in 1842.
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!