But that was not the whole story
This study on the very same children shows why
adc.bmj.com/content/early/…
1/6
BUT - they removed cases with *shared exposure", who most likely got infected at the same time as the child
What did they find?
2/6
A secondary attack rate of 0.5%
This is compared to a household SAR from adults of 7.6% using the same method of analysis
ophrp.org/journal/view.p…
3/6
This extraordinarily low SAR is in the setting of intense infection prevention (child and household members immediately quarantined from each other, caregiver in full PPE!)
Some of the excluded cases may have been true secondary cases, but likely few
4/6
Using the same method of assessment, it appears less frequent than from adults in the same circumstances
5/6
- Be careful interpreting studies with lots of confounders
- Do not rely on any single study; see the whole literature in context
- Children may transmit less readily than adults, but we definitely need more evidence to be sure, or to quantify that fact
6/6