So, at the #DNC2020, @kerrywashington said "black people were considered three-fifths of a human being." #FactCheck: False. Slaves — not named as such in the Constitution — were counted as 3/5 for proportional representation. #DemConvention 1/3
This was a defeat for Southern slave states like Virginia, which wanted masters to have more political power and count slaves as 1 person for proportional representation. 3/5 was a compromise. This is a deceptive talking point. 2/3
Finally, free black people were counted as a full person for representation. While slavery was a heinous evil that the Founders made compromises to limit but did not expunge, people only muddy the waters with @kerrywashington's false claim. 3/3
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gov-elect Abigail Spanberger apparently doesn’t consider it disqualifying for someone to endorse an activist group that considers the official teaching of your faith “hateful.”
The whistleblower account @Minnesota_DHS went viral after accusing Tim Walz of retaliation against whistleblowers amid the massive fraud scandals. X suspended the account. Conservatives think this was more retaliation.
“Certainly it was retaliation, the question is by whom?” @billglahn with @MNThinkTank told me.
He said the X account had been feeding him information only insiders would know.
🧵2/8
State Rep. @KRobbinsMN suggested "someone went to X and said, 'They're not who they say they are,' which just is not true." Robbins told me that she has met in person with the whistleblowers behind the account.
Salesforce, a 75K-employee firm, uses Benevity to help workers make an impact. Benevity helps employees support causes they believe in, donating before taxes, matching grants, and volunteering. But Salesforce blacklisted conservatives using SPLC.
SPLC leverages its reputation of suing KKK groups into bankruptcy, putting out a "hate map" that plots mainstream conservative and Christian groups alongside Klan chapters. How do you get on the map? By opposing the SPLC's agenda.
HHS asked medical professionals around the world for peer review, but the department also asked pro-trans groups—the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Psychiatric Association, and the Endocrine Society—to weigh in. The AAP and ES refused to even engage.
🧵2/7
HHS let these groups "point out whether the review might have made errors or omissions," Sapir told me. The supplement, released today, shows that "no such errors or omissions could be identified."
Transgender activists pressured a national organization to remove accreditation from a peer-reviewed course from @segm_ebm, citing the Southern Poverty Law Center. SEGM's crime? Questioning "gender-affirming care."
First, a little background: Doctors take continuing education courses to retain their licenses. SEGM, a non-partisan group of doctors who advocate for higher medical standards, developed 7 courses examining misconceptions about experimental transgender "medicine."
🧵2/13
SEGM told me the courses "had already undergone nearly a year of rigorous accreditation review" before the Washington State University medical college approved them.