Two unarmed protesters were shot while attempting to disarm a white supremacist gunman in Kenosha. They were shot while protecting their community from white supremacist violence, during protests against state-sanctioned white supremacist violence.
In the US we call them "race riots," hiding the truth that we have a long history of white supremacist vigilantes working with white supremacist police to commit white supremacist violence and terrorism. It happened in Rhode Island in 1824, in Chicago in 1919, in Tulsa in 1921.
The list of US "race riots" i.e. white supremacist terrorism goes on and on and on. And yet so much reporting on #BlackLivesMatter protests ignores the US's long history of state-sanctioned white supremacist violence - the very issue that BLM is working to end.
In this way the corporate media values property over life and perpetuates the white supremacist narratives that stoke white supremacist violence and terrorism in the US.
US papers & media stoking white supremacist violence is not a bug but a feature in US history. Research US "race riots" and for every incident you will find a local paper fanning the flames and working white supremacists into a frenzy. tulsaworld.com/news/tulsa-rac…
There are of course many variables that led to last night's white supremacist violence in Kenosha - like Trump uplifting armed white supremacist vigilantes during his party's national convention. But a key takeaway must be this: if we want peace, we must work for justice.
And in the US working for justice means confronting white supremacy in all it's forms - in our policies, in our reporting, in our discourse, in our actions.
In the second decade of the 21st century our nation is once again being asked to reckon with white supremacy and anti-Blackness. Let us come together for justice, and let us win peace by dismantling white supremacy once and for all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's a Biden supporter, or an account claiming to be one, arguing that Biden's homophobic comments makes Biden more electable. I would file this comment under homophobic harrassment. But here's the thing: this comment won't lead me to vote for Trump if Biden is the Dem nominee.
Why? Because I have no idea who is behind the account. Because a nasty comment from someone claiming to be a "supporter" of any given candidate should not matter when I decide who I want to be my president. You know what should matter? The candidate's track record and positions.
I do not understand why adults, particularly those claiming to care deeply about policy, are stating that their vote will be swayed by their online interactions with a candidate's alleged supporters. What!?
A thread: In my four years on the Chicago City Council I’ve faced anti-immigrant, anti-Latinx, and homophobic harassment from some of my colleagues.
Until now I’ve remained quiet about the harassment I’ve received because it’s not about me, it’s about us, and I've felt there are much bigger systemic issues that require our energy and attention.
I also know that much of the ire I’ve received is a direct result of my progressive stances & my siding with our grassroots social movements, whether it be #NoCopAcademy, #CPACNow, #EraseTheDatabase, & that the youth at the frontlines of these movements have received much worse.