Then you would disown the book which rails agonist “kaffirs” and “polytheists” and calls them the “worst of creatures.”

Given that this is part of a religious belief and considered the “word of god” it is far more toxic and dangerous than a #CharlieHebdo cartoon.
#CharlieHebdo is a joke, it is meant for laughs.

I wish the absurd beliefs in eternal heaven and hell and “God’s only son” and “last prophet” were also taken as jokes and not taken seriously by grown men.

I’d have no problems with these then.
You can go ahead and find all the verses against kaffirs and polytheists in your book. Now imagine for a moment all those verses were against Muslims with "proper context." Would you not find these verses hateful? You need courage to examine this.

This is a good academic reference of all the verses against kaffirs and also their violent implementation by "true believers." So let's not spin away their effects. @waseemsayed

digital.lib.washington.edu/researchworks/…
Banal words like "ever merciful" mean nothing. They are simply words. They'll be judged on their effects, not the spin. And the effect is barbaric invasions and slaughter, effect is Al Qaeda and Taliban and Boko Haram and #ISIS. It is terror, not mercy.

This is a disingenuous. The Taliban spent a lifetime studying the Koran. #ISIS leader Baghdadi was a Ph.D. in Islamic studies. Saying this is all "misinterpretation" doesn't help the #Yezidi killed and enslaved by Islamic zealots. You avoid the issues.

What if your "Holy Book" insults me? It holds me as "worst of creatures" as a polytheist. It insults my devas when it rails against "there is no God but Allah." It insults my guru and *your* Imām Mahdi. It kills Ahmediyas. You defend your own slaughter.

They mean nothing because the actions of those who claim to follow them are anything but "merciful." So clearly they mean nothing to all the brutal invaders on whose sword Islam was spread. Using them you mock the suffering of those killed, like #Yezidi.

Feel free to. But then don't go around claiming that you "respect all beliefs" and you "religion teaches you not to insult others" and that is why #CharlieHebdo is wrong.

Own your hate and bigotry. At least be honest.

So you won't be insulted if I declare your religion false and fabricated? So you mean your prophet was delusional to make up a false religion? I hope you won't consider this insulting, because I'm not trying to insult you, just to understand your point.

Is that why you riot when “insulted”?

https://t.co/bu4HmwQZ8s
It would be good if you can compile a list of all of the verses of "Allah's word" which are "invalid" today. Maybe even crowd-source it. Once there is a full list you can cc the Taliban and #ISIS & Boko Haram and Al Qaeda since no one sent them the memo.

Shouldn't your lessons about "peace and understanding" be directed towards #ISIS, Taliban, #AlQaeda, #LeT and so many other groups. They'd say you're bs'ing about #jihad not being valid today. Let me know how it goes—and do tell them you're Ahmediya too.

Actually the West is being Hinduised. Without any petro$ or "dawa", millions around the world are embracing yoga, chanting OM, doing kirtan and Hindu goddess worship.

When they become Hindu they meditate for world peace.

And in the other case? *Boom*.

From the Newsweek cover story “We are all Hindus now.”

google.com/amp/s/www.news…
Of course. Why do you think I speak up for Yezidi and Native American and all the other indigenous traditions of the world brutalized by two predatory religions.

https://t.co/Xu7y5H8lcU
I honor all indigenous traditions of the world. They don’t need to convert or be “Hindu.” They follow their own ways, true for them.

Two monopolistic religions declare all others (and each other) “false.” This belief engenders violence in the world.

https://t.co/h3vzkae3JL

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ

Sankrant Sanu सानु संक्रान्त ਸੰਕ੍ਰਾਂਤ ਸਾਨੁ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sankrant

Jan 5
Hitler was a Christian Socialist.

Both groups try hard to pretend he was neither of those.

And yes, he did have a soft corner for Islam, with an entire Muslim division, united in Jew-hate.

(Credit: Babylon Bee)
Hitler was born and died a Christian. His hate of Jews comes from Christianity.

He never repudiated Christianity. He sometimes criticized it as becoming weak. This is internal criticism, not repudiation.
Christians are hilarious, they don't even own up to their heroes.

Christians persecuted Jews in Europe much before Hitler. Pope Innocent III, mandated that Jews wear Yellow Badges to be seen separate; Hitler re-instituted that.

Hitler's "final solution" was to the Christian theological problem—of Jews not accepting Jesus as the Messiah.

Hitler never used the word Swastika. His called his symbol the Hooked Cross (Hakenkreuz). A Christian pastor translated that word to "Swastika" to hide its Christian connotation—propaganda and lies are the foundation of the Church.

x.com/realshivakumar…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 16, 2025
This is a direct quote from Sahih Al Bukhari.

Sahih means it is an authenticated hadith.

The terrorists are being authentic to what their prophet said.

Either your reject the prophet, or you follow this. Image
This is exactly the verse quoted in the Hamas charter.

This is what "from the river to the sea" means. It is a call for genocide. It's what all the pro-Palestine crowd is about.

You can check the verse yourself here:

sunnah.com/bukhari:2926
Read 6 tweets
Dec 5, 2025
People keep saying—one day Islam will have its Reformation & become modern.

Wrong. The Islamic Reformation already happened.
The name: Sayyid Qutb (hanged 1966).

The result wasn’t modernism—it was Tehran 1979, Taliban, ISIS, al-Qaeda, and the biggest U-turn in 500 years. ↓ 1/Image
1970s → 2025

Women students in University in Teheran→Iranian morality police dragging a woman by her hair (2024)

Kabul University women graduating unveiled→Taliban padlocking a girls’ school (2023)

This is what “the real Islamic Reformation” looks like.

Who is Qutb?
2/ Image
Image
Image
Sayyid Qutb

1940s: respected literary critic, and school teacher

1950: two years in America → came home convinced the entire modern world was a new paganism (jāhiliyyah)

1954-66: tortured in Nasser’s prisons → wrote the manifesto that lit the fire.

I read it for you.

3/
Read 12 tweets
Nov 30, 2025
China systematically demolished narratives of Islam and Christianity in China. It declared Islam a mental illness and made sure it controlled all Churches and Church appointments, only authorized sermons could be taught.

It colonized Tibet, inter-married, indoctrinated a Chinese-nationalist Tibetan generation.

India fanned separatism. It allowed false histories in Kashmir, separatism of language, promotion of Urdu and Persian script. It allowed mosques to preach hate and separatism. If it were acting like China, it would have outlawed Persian script and controlled every mosque and sermon. It would have taught the history of Islamic conquest and barbarity to every child. China can promote false narratives in Tibet for integration; India cannot even promote true narratives for what was always part of us.

Similarly in Punjab, India treated Khalistan as a law-and-order problem rather than a narrative war. It allowed fake separatist narratives to flourish. Rather than promoting scholars and narratives which show the unity of Sikhs and Hindus it allowed separatist narratives to flourish. What would China have done?

Same story in the North East. India gave a free reign to Baptist missionaries who converted the indigenous people and taught them to hate India. Separatism come downstream of that. There was no attempt by India to reverse the narrative.

The narrative soft war and the hard war must go together. If you ignore the soft war, you get stuck with constantly fighting the hard war. And the hard war victory will only be temporary tell the false narrative is overturned.
Absolutely, Dravidianism is another false narrative.

All great civilizations were bound by a common narrative. "Secularism" is not a narrative that can bind anything. Minoritism and appeasement create centrifugal forces which split the nation apart.

China's new set of XUAR Religious Affairs Regulations, 2024.

In this it is required that religions promote content for social harmony and interpret religious teaching and rules in line with China's requirements for development and "in line with traditional Chinese culture."

What if India said, mosques and Churches can only teach and promote what is in line with traditional Hindu culture of pluralism and teaching hate and separatism is a cognizable offence?Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 28, 2025
Reading the book "Hindu polity" and remembering that India has tried, experimented with, and forgotten more forms of governments than the West can remember.

And yet we think "democracy" was this great Western innovation to civilize us. Image
The A-rajak are non-ruled states. There is a Western fantasy of "egalitarian" society where all are equals with no rulers. (It's a fantasy because nowhere in the world it exists).

Well India tried it a few times. It doesn't work. It's where the word "arajakta" comes from.
The "Arajaka" state with the "rule of law" rather than of a person was a subject of derision, because it inevitably failed. But what evidence did we crown it as the best? Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Nov 12, 2025
Reading "Two Centuries of Silence"—the lament of the Persians in having the barbaric Arab Muslims impose their religion and culture on the advanced Persian Civilization.

We are not the only ones with this lament. This happened across the world. We are the ones who survived. Image
There was really nothing much of value in Arab lands, and the little that was useful was ruled by the Persians who were looked up to by the Arabs. Image
This is the environment in which Islam emerges from.

"These Bedouin tribes led predatory lives and on their minds there was nothing but greed, profit worship, and what satisfied their most primitive desire...their life’s sole interests were lust, wine, and fighting."Image
Image
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(