Supreme Court to shortly take up pleas challenging CBSE decision to hold compartment exams amid #COVID19 . @cbseindia29 to file affidavit today on when #compartmentexams will be held in Sept
The court was earlier informed that the #CompartmentExams2020 will be held end September. Petitioners stated admissions would be over by the time exams are held & results announced.
Senior Adv Vivek Tankha: CBSE could not hold exams due to #covid19 Then they conducted hybrid mode of exams where last year exams was used to assess the students. A lot of students are facing compartment
Sr Adv Tankha: College admissions for PG and UG courses came to end on August 31. The problem is two-fold, compartment exams was notified on Sept 4 after you issued notice. now exams are to be held on Sept 22 to 29
Tankha: The question is about the safety of students which you have already dealt in the UGC matter, etc. But compartment exams from Sept 22 will lead to their whole year being wasted. some solution has to be there
Tankha: Earlier admissions were held only after compartment exams results were announced. CBSE can help up by telling universities that admission be granted on a provisional basis
Justice Khanwilkar: but admission on what basis? if compartment then there would be no percentage?
SC: This is a very peculiar year. We have to see some extraordinary situations. the solution cannot be offered by CBSE but by another agency
Tankha: Union of India and states are a party to the case. About 5 lakh students will appear in the compartment exams
Justice Sanjiv Khanna: Compartment exams are for students who have not managed to pass the subjects as there is always a "best of scheme" to calculate the percentages
Tankha: Please create some room for these students to take college admissions.
Tankha: What will the students do in October after the compartment exam results are announced?
Justice Khanwilkar: If we issue notice to all universities in the country, then that would not be a viable solution.
Tankha: Union of India can be given a copy of this so that they can advise or ask the states and the universities therein. My first reaction to the briefing counsel was your two prayers are self contradictory
Can we serve the states as they are a party in my petition?
SC: It will take a long time. You have made only selective states a party. The country has to be treated as a whole.
You only serve the law officer of Union of India & not the states. Let us not complicate it further
Supreme Court Bar Association holds farewell function for Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia
#SupremeCourt #SCBA
AG R Venkataramani: emotions of a judge has to be part of justice suspension system. Justice Dhulia in case of irretrievable breakdown of marriage to deciding plea of a death row convict, he brought out the subtle interplay of emotions.
Sr Adv Vikas Singh, SCBA President: In the hijab case, I think It is not an essential part.. even if they consider it as essential.... He noted what difference will it make if they wear it.. he ensured that there is no alienation is there and they are part of the mainstream
The Supreme Court will shortly continue hearing the appeals concerning JSW Steelโs โน19,700 crore resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel Limited (BPSL).
SG Mehta appears for CoC. He says "Once CoC is constituted under Section 21, it remains in place till Section 62 appeal. If an authority or body has power to do something, it can do so periodically. CoC's power cannot be extinguished after my approving the resolution plan."
SG Mehta: This is one of the worst cases of siphoning I have come across among the cases I have done. Now they are finding fault with the person who has come with best resolution plan
Police must not remain mute spectators to unlawful takeovers by political mobs, says Justice N Nagaresh while granting police protection to Kizhakkambalam Grama Panchayat for bus stand renovation works.
Kizhakkambalam Panchayat moved the Court seeking police protection to complete the construction of its modernised bus stand.
Panchayat alleged that former Panchayat President and political workers had illegally trespassed into the premises on July 4, 2025, removed barricades, damaged structures, forcibly redirected traffic, and erected an unauthorised waiting shed.
Supreme Court reconsiders case where it had passed adverse remarks against sitting Allahabad High Court Judge Prashant Kumar.
Bench: Justices JB Pardiwala and R Mahadevan
The Court had said Justice Kumar shouldnโt be allowed to deal with criminal cases till he demits office for encouraging criminal proceedings in a matter of civil nature.
Court: we have received an undated letter from the CJI requesting us to reconsider the directions passed in our earlier order. In such circumstances we direct the registry to re notify the matter. By our order dated 4.8.25 we set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing in the HC.
Delhi High Court is hearing the petition filed by 2020 Delhi riots accused Devangana Kalita seeking to inspect the CCTV footage of the riots at North-East Delhi area.
Advocate Adit Pujari appearing for Devangana Kalita - The arguments on charge are going on. The law in India today is that: prior to arguments on charge, you should get a list of unrelied upon documents and you should be allowed to inspect it.
Pujari- The learned judge has refused to give me the list of unrelied upon documents and has refused to allow me to inspect. There is a video which shows that I was not involved in violence.